Willer Kerman Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, SpaceplaneAddict said: Aha! This is an edited statement! Invalid I believe yes? The last valid claim was This. So. 73 (-). Sorry. The player must not edit his Action after another player has made a Move. If this is proven to have happened, the altered Move is to be made invalid. Editing the post's CN to correct it, however, is allowed. Excerpt taken from the rules of the game. Do we have to wait for a moderator? Edited April 11, 2019 by Willer Kerman Question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceplaneAddict Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Willer Kerman said: The player must not edit his Action after another player has made a Move. If this is proven to have happened, the altered Move is to be made invalid. Editing the post's CN to correct it, however, is allowed. Excerpt taken from the rules of the game. I don't see anything in the edited statement that suggests it was just a correction. The post previous that on that page, however, was a correction, and as such I did not use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 probably. @Dman979? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceplaneAddict Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 Definitely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 so are we waiting for a moderator? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceplaneAddict Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 I think it'd be best to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willer Kerman Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, SpaceplaneAddict said: I don't see anything in the edited statement that suggests it was just a correction. The post previous that on that page, however, was a correction, and as such I did not use it. Probably he and I posted at the same time, it has happened frequently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceplaneAddict Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 Be that as it may, it's an edited statement with no proof of correction. Accidents happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 (edited) No need to call some Moderator, if your number is wrong, edit it so that it's invalid Like... Previous post : 93 (-) Post : 93 (+) Next Post : 95 (+) The middle ones should be edited into "Invalid" or whatever with same idea...while the lower one should edit immediately... Also...when did @The_Arcitect posted ??? After @qzgy ??? Edited April 11, 2019 by GRS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willer Kerman Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 5 minutes ago, GRS said: No need to call some Moderator, if your number is wrong, edit it so that it's invalid Like... Previous post : 93 (-) Post : 93 (+) Next Post : 95 (+) The middle ones should be edited into "Invalid" or whatever with same idea...while the lower one should edit immediately... Also...when did @The_Arcitect posted ??? After @qzgy ??? So... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guesswho2778 Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 94 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 (edited) Did the posts happen EXACTLY at the same time ??? If it's true, then there better be a Compensation so that we can still continue, any witnesses ??? @Aperture Science, where are you ??? Edited April 11, 2019 by GRS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qzgy Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 23 minutes ago, GRS said: Also...when did @The_Arcitect posted ??? After @qzgy ??? Seeing as I am involved in the dispute, that series of posts was done sequentially. As in, the Architect posted before me, then I responded, and then the arcitect again. There was no dispute over the number there, his edit was merely to add in the image 3/4 of the way there image. As much as it pains me to say, I think everything till now has been valid. So carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 That means it's fine...(?) 95 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qzgy Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 1 minute ago, GRS said: That means it's fine...(?) 95 (+) dont see why it shouldn't be. 94 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 95 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qzgy Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 94 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 95 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qzgy Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 94 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guesswho2778 Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 93 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qzgy Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 92 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willer Kerman Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 93 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qzgy Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 92 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willer Kerman Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 93 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 94 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts