Leicontis Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 I wasn\'t referring so much to the polycount of the sphere as to that of the base (decoupler?) - especially from those teeth at the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 10, 2012 Author Share Posted January 10, 2012 I wasn\'t referring so much to the polycount of the sphere as to that of the base (decoupler?) - especially from those teeth at the top.Yeah, I\'m going to halve the number of teeth. I don\'t like how it looks with this many, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GroundHOG-2010 Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Sure. Let\'s name it something that you can\'t type on an English only keyboard. > Also, no need to be a dick about the name I offered. I was only kidding.Sorry about being a dick. And if you didn\'t notice, Wernher von Braun was specking in russian, so I translated what I was going to say into russian. It translates into whale shark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saaur Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Sure. Let\'s name it something that you can\'t type on an English only keyboard. >You can\'t type 'Kitovaya Akula' on your keyboard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 10, 2012 Author Share Posted January 10, 2012 New update should come today hopefully. After that, I\'m just going to remodel the Mk3 and Mk4 pods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OtherDalfite Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 You can\'t type 'Kitovaya Akula' on your keyboard?I meant with all them fancy Russian letters. Also, not everybody knows Russian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarkun Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 I meant with all them fancy Russian letters. Also, not everybody knows Russian. It doesn\'t matter what keyboard you have, only how your OS interprets the keystrokes. I can go ?????in an instant and I don\'t have a separate keyboard for that.Sorry for the offtopic Nova. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OtherDalfite Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 Strange. Unless you\'re triforcing, I have no idea how to do that. More on topic, that rockets pretty cool looking Nova. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 11, 2012 Author Share Posted January 11, 2012 1.2 released!You can get it here (16.8 mb):http://dl.dropbox.com/u/575558/KSP/KSP%20Silisko%20Edition%201.2.zipMirror:http://www./?gfp78032aovm2i1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luigibro606 Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 Changelog? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 11, 2012 Author Share Posted January 11, 2012 Changelog?Err.New textures for many partsFuel tanks can now be surface-attachedRemoved decoupler clamp as it was rendered useless with the above changeThat\'s all I can remember.It\'s 0.13.1 compatible, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luigibro606 Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 Mkay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 11, 2012 Author Share Posted January 11, 2012 New Mk4 pod pretty much done:Also, I think I\'ve pretty much confirmed that I\'ve made staging viable.This could put the pod and upper stage into orbit:This could not put anything into orbit(well, if it didn\'t have the pod maybe it could lift itself there):Sole difference between the two is the addition of a staging event and upper stage engine for the first one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablock Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 I see a reintroduced and retextured fuel tank adapter here! If it\'s not an error, thanks! I missed it.(and also thanks for ALL this pack. It\'s awesome) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sordid Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 I see a reintroduced and retextured fuel tank adapter here! If it\'s not an error, thanks! I missed it.Yeah, but radial stack decoupler is gone now. Understandable, given that tanks are now surface-attachable, but I still miss it.Also, permission to re-texture your parts, Nova?Oh, and what\'s with the decoupler shroud? The shroud seems to remain attached to the engine rather than fall away with the decoupler. :-\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 11, 2012 Author Share Posted January 11, 2012 Yeah, but radial stack decoupler is gone now. Understandable, given that tanks are now surface-attachable, but I still miss it.Also, permission to re-texture your parts, Nova?Oh, and what\'s with the decoupler shroud? The shroud seems to remain attached to the engine rather than fall away with the decoupler. :-\1. Depends on what you\'re going to retexture them with 2. That was intended, it\'s based on the Soyuz third stage (the interstage stays attached) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gojira Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 I don\'t really like that. I think it makes shuttles look ugly.:s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sordid Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 1. Depends on what you\'re going to retexture them with My mad photoshop sk!11z0rz? Erno, I don\'t have a solid idea yet, all I know is that I want to make stuff more visually interesting. This new version is just uniform grey, which I find extremely boring.2. That was intended, it\'s based on the Soyuz third stage (the interstage stays attached)Yeah, but the shroud is too short for some of the engines, so you end up with this weird ring thing around the nozzle just kinda floating there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 11, 2012 Author Share Posted January 11, 2012 My mad photoshop sk!11z0rz? Erno, I don\'t have a solid idea yet, all I know is that I want to make stuff more visually interesting. This new version is just uniform grey, which I find extremely boring.Yeah, but the shroud is too short for some of the engines, so you end up with this weird ring thing around the nozzle just kinda floating there.1. They aren\'t uniform grey...there\'s little bits of metal placed seemingly at random, like on the Titan rockets. But I\'ll increase the contrast a bit for 1.3.2. It was only intended for the upper stage engine. I don\'t really want to add a bunch of them to cover ALL the engines, it\'d just get cluttered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sordid Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 1. They aren\'t uniform grey...there\'s little bits of metal placed seemingly at random, like on the Titan rockets. But I\'ll increase the contrast a bit for 1.3.That won\'t make them any less grey. Re-texture permission, yay or nay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 11, 2012 Author Share Posted January 11, 2012 That won\'t make them any less grey. Re-texture permission, yay or nay?Oh fine... (Also I\'ll add more color to the textures) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gojira Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 nooooi like them :c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sordid Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 Oh fine... Thank you kindly. nooooi like them :cKeep the old textures, then?That might be something to consider. Texture packs. Because why the hell not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorfinn Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 Nova, is your 'one directional thruster' supposed to consume that much? Two of them exhaust a standard 1m RCS tank in seconds, and they don\'t even give much delta-V in the process (pod+2 RCS tanks+ASAS+decoupler...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gojira Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 Nova, is your 'one directional thruster' supposed to consume that much? Two of them exhaust a standard 1m RCS tank in seconds, and they don\'t even give much delta-V in the process (pod+2 RCS tanks+ASAS+decoupler...)Make it an LFE if it concerns you so much.:s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts