Jump to content

[1.2.2] Stock Part Revamp, Update 1.9.6. Released Source Files!

Ven

By Ven
in KSP1 Mod Development

 Share

Recommended Posts

Buisson

Buisson

Posted
Posted

I do as well, do you use FAR ? I do and the engines are note compatible with FAR... it makes the whole rocket flip over and ... well you know the end...

I uninstalled Ven's mod until I can figure this out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bombaatu

Bombaatu

Posted
Posted

Sorry - don't know if this is a known issue or not. I installed this mod & tried to attach a Terrier engine to a 1.25 meter fuel tank. The tankbutt was 2.5 meter. Is there a setting that makes the tankbutt automatically conform to the size of the part it is attached to? If so, will it conform to non-standard sizes (like the 1.875 meter size used by Mark One Laboratory Extensions)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blowfish

blowfish

Posted
Posted
  On 6/6/2016 at 4:17 PM, Bombaatu said:

Sorry - don't know if this is a known issue or not. I installed this mod & tried to attach a Terrier engine to a 1.25 meter fuel tank. The tankbutt was 2.5 meter. Is there a setting that makes the tankbutt automatically conform to the size of the part it is attached to? If so, will it conform to non-standard sizes (like the 1.875 meter size used by Mark One Laboratory Extensions)?

Expand  

There are two stack nodes which are pretty close together.  One has the 2.5m tankbutt and one does not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Probus

Probus

Posted
Posted
  On 6/6/2016 at 9:33 PM, Poodmund said:

Ah, I read that people were having issues with the bumpers but didn't realise it was known that they are not functioning. Do you happen to know the last version that they were working?

Expand  

Is this the Docking Camera issue (double bumpers)?  They work great if you remove or update the Docking Camera mod.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Poodmund

Poodmund

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 6/7/2016 at 10:15 AM, Probus said:

Is this the Docking Camera issue (double bumpers)?  They work great if you remove or update the Docking Camera mod.  

Expand  

Not that I am aware of, the ports just would not magnetize and pull or dock even if you bumped slowly straight at the ports. Gonna go test a few things.

EDIT: Seems all the other ports are fine except for dockingport2 and dockingport3; being the regular, Clamp-o-tron Docking Port and the Clamp-o-tron Jnr. Does this tie into what others are experiencing?

Edited by Poodmund
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TeiwazVIE

TeiwazVIE

Posted
Posted

Does anyone know why this happens with the RD-253/RD-275 and how to fix it (if it is caused by the revamp)?

Also, once I detach the launch stages and reattach them, the CoL is somewhere below the capsule's parachute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CobaltWolf

CobaltWolf

Posted
Posted
  On 6/7/2016 at 11:36 PM, TeiwazVIE said:

Does anyone know why this happens with the RD-253/RD-275 and how to fix it (if it is caused by the revamp)?

Also, once I detach the launch stages and reattach them, the CoL is somewhere below the capsule's parachute.

Expand  

Perhaps you should ask the RO people since that's changing VSR pretty heavily in that install.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ferram4

ferram4

Posted
Posted (edited)

@Ven: It looks like your new models for the Mainsail, Skipper, Rhino, and I believe the Poodle and Terrier as well all cause voxelization errors with FAR.  All of the resulting behavior points to vertexes or triangles of either mesh or collider floating WAY out beyond the rest of the model, screwing up all attempts to figure out the bounds of the vehicle.  This will also cause issues with stock drag and heating as well, if that concerns you.

I can't fix any of this on my end, I'm afraid.  FAR doesn't have any easy way to determine which parts of the mesh / colliders to ignore, so could you take a look at those and see if you can find any issues?

Edit: I copied this issue to the repo for easy tracking.  Hope that doesn't cause any issues.

Edited by ferram4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Buisson

Buisson

Posted
Posted

Hello !

I confirmed what @ferram4 and @TeiwazVIE just said. For me, it's the Skipper and Mainsail. I didn't unlocked the Rhino so far, so couldn't tell, but the Poodle and Terrier are fine for me.

As I don't know how to fix this, I just removed the Skipper.mu and Mainsail.mu files from the mod for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FuzzY60

FuzzY60

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hello guys !

I am having issues while playing around with the ven's stock revamp and the procedural parts:

I am building a rocket with procedural parts and I just discovered that ven's stock revamp has new tank butts for the engines.

If I am right, the additional node that one can see above the engines in the VAB is new with vens revamp and can be used to make the tank butts appear.

The problem is that I want to make a nice 2.5 shroud around my RE-I5 "Skipper" engine but I cannot find a way to cover the tank butt correctly with a nice and solid shroud.

 

Do you maybe have a idea how to do this ?

 

Thank you very much ! :)

 

Edit: Forgot to mention that node at the nozle of the engine seems to be higher than it  should be ? 

Edited by FuzzY60
Forgot to mention that node at the nozle of the engine seems to be higher than it should be ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
  On 6/8/2016 at 1:03 PM, FuzzY60 said:

Hello guys !

I am having issues while playing around with the ven's stock revamp and the procedural parts:

I am building a rocket with procedural parts and I just discovered that ven's stock revamp has new tank butts for the engines.

If I am right, the additional node that one can see above the engines in the VAB is new with vens revamp and can be used to make the tank butts appear.

The problem is that I want to make a nice 2.5 shroud around my RE-I5 "Skipper" engine but I cannot find a way to cover the tank butt correctly with a nice and solid shroud.

 

Do you maybe have a idea how to do this ?

 

Thank you very much ! :)

 

Edit: Forgot to mention that node at the nozle of the engine seems to be higher than it  should be ? 

Expand  
 

There are two top nodes for the engines. The uppermost will give you a tank butt, the lower one will be buttless. I do agree with you about the shroud not properly covering the tank-butted Skipper. 

♫♫ I like tank butts and I cannot lie... ♫♫ (oh, come on, you were already thinking it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FuzzY60

FuzzY60

Posted
Posted
  On 6/8/2016 at 2:48 PM, Jack Wolfe said:

There are two top nodes for the engines. The uppermost will give you a tank butt, the lower one will be buttless. I do agree with you about the shroud not properly covering the tank-butted Skipper. 

♫♫ I like tank butts and I cannot lie... ♫♫ (oh, come on, you were already thinking it)

Expand  

Thanks for your quick response !

Do you by chance know any way to get rid of this "shroud-less" problem ? :D

Thanks man !

Any further hints and tricks are welcome :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Poodmund

Poodmund

Posted
Posted

Those panels in 1.9.3 were positioned 90 degrees off rotation in the model so I presume you've updated to 1.9.4 and the model has updated to be positioned correctly. The panels on new craft you launch should be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Silent1_87

Silent1_87

Posted
Posted
  On 6/11/2016 at 1:22 PM, CobaltWolf said:

where do your sympathies lie these days?

Expand  

Sympathies to what im confused? Are u kidding or serious? 

  On 6/11/2016 at 10:41 AM, Poodmund said:

Those panels in 1.9.3 were positioned 90 degrees off rotation in the model so I presume you've updated to 1.9.4 and the model has updated to be positioned correctly. The panels on new craft you launch should be fine.

Expand  

U r right my new craft r correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...