Aethon

Blue Origin Thread (merged)

9351 posts in this topic

7 minutes ago, kerbiloid said:

(I also missed Endeavour).

As the barges autonomous drone ships are named "Just Read The Instructions" and "Of Course I Still Love You", they should choose some short and clear names from sci-fi and for rockets.

For example, from Niven's Ringworld. Let them be "Halrloprillalar Hotrufan" and "Karawesksenjojak",

Something like "A Short and Clear Name" would be more in line with the names from the Culture novels by Iain M. Banks. Btw. I just checked and I think "Cargo Cult" and "So Much For Subtlety" would make excellent names for the first MCT / ITS / what's-it-called-today -s.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, kerbiloid said:

(I also missed Endeavour).

As the barges autonomous drone ships are named "Just Read The Instructions" and "Of Course I Still Love You", they should choose some short and clear names from sci-fi and for rockets.

For example, from Niven's Ringworld. Let them be "Halrloprillalar Hotrufan" and "Karawesksenjojak",

Lewis and Clark? Galileo?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I would guess Elon is trying to become the "Ford" of space travel with the "Model T" of boosters 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, StrandedonEarth said:

Well, I would guess Elon is trying to become the "Ford" of space travel with the "Model T" of boosters 

That's what the shuttle tried to do, but the analogy was the Douglas DC-3.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Nibb31 said:

The first "prototype" was OV-101 Enterprise, but there was a mockup for clearance testing (to develop procedures for handling and fitting the orbiters) called Pathfinder, that later received the "OV-98" registration. There was also a scale model called Independence that received the "OV-100" number. There's an OV-95 that was a mockup for crew training, STA-96 and STA-97 that were test articles, and MPTA-98, which was a "main propulsion test assembly" (basically an engine frame), but none of those have any christening names.

OV-95 was the SAIL (Shuttle Avionics Integration Laboratory), used for software and avionics development and testing, not crew training.  (It received an OV number because it was managed under the same configuration control system and standards as the flight vehicles.)  Independence is a non flight replica and has no official NASA number.

A full list of the official designations can be found here.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting a little off-topic, but I believe the OV-0 series were never intended for flight, and the OV-1 series were supposed to be the operational vehicles. Except it was more cost effective to rebuild STA-099 (Challenger) into a proper orbiter than OV-101 (Enterprise), which then never flew to orbit and wasn't retroactively renumbered, but Columbia was upgraded to OV-99.

Edited by RCgothic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RCgothic said:

Getting a little off-topic

"A little"? :P

Well, here's something on topic:

Yes, you are seeing correctly: a "No Earlier Than" date was moved... to an earlier date! :D

8 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spacex launch date creeping ever closer :) @TheEpicSquared

SES10 is going to be a vital mission, I have to point out. The reuse of the 1st stage! The excitement is accumulating and has been for a long time to say the least!! :):P:D 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Oliverm001x said:

Spacex launch date creeping ever closer :) @TheEpicSquared

SES10 is going to be a vital mission, I have to point out. The reuse of the 1st stage! The excitement is accumulating and has been for a long time to say the least!! :):P:D 

You pinged me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TheEpicSquared said:

You pinged me?

?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Oliverm001x said:

Spacex launch date creeping ever closer :) @TheEpicSquared

SES10 is going to be a vital mission, I have to point out. The reuse of the 1st stage! The excitement is accumulating and has been for a long time to say the least!! :):P:D 

Wait, this is a re-used first stage!?

I may have to take a day off work to watch this one...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mitchz95 said:

Wait, this is a re-used first stage!?

I may have to take a day off work to watch this one...

No, this is CRS-10, and will use a new first stage. SES-10, sometime in march, will reuse the CRS-8 first stage. :) 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mitchz95 said:

I may have to take a day off work to watch this one...

Have fun explaining that to your boss!

6 hours ago, TheEpicSquared said:

SES-10, sometime in march, will reuse the CRS-8 first stage

Glad to hear that they are finally relaunching an F9 1st stage. By the way, is the CRS-8 being used for any technical reason or just for good luck?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, LetsGoToMars! said:

Glad to hear that they are finally relaunching an F9 1st stage. By the way, is the CRS-8 being used for any technical reason or just for good luck?

I assume that they looked at all their first stages and determined that they wanted to go with this one for reasons that would fill a 320-page report to the FAA. :P

8 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a25232/nasa-considers-astronauts-sls-launch/

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/02/nasa-looking-to-accelerate-first-crewed-orion-launch-to-as-early-as-2019/?comments=1

I see no reason why not. The DCSS and Orion have already flown unmanned together, and the modified Shuttle hardware was proven on 135 flights.

Even if there is something wrong during ascent, Orion has a LES. The Shuttle flew manned on its first flight and it had no crew safety measures!

Makes me wonder what they'll do for EM-2 though. Maybe an Inspiration Mars-style mission?

Edited by _Augustus_
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/10/2014 at 11:38 AM, GreeningGalaxy said:

This thing can go to Mars??

Not a landing there, obviously, but if it can really get to Mars orbit/flyby and back with its crew still alive (which I doubt, but still) that would be impressive.

Whenever I see pictures of the SLS, I catch myself trying to identify KSP NASA parts. :sticktongue:

EDIT:

Wikipedia says that the Orion spacecraft is designed to go to Mars, but doesn't elaborate.

The NASA website does something similar. ...okay?

Anyone got better info?

It will carry a lander eventually possible one of my designs (I am very optimistic)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or a struggle for funds food gets more keen.
 

 

Edited by Frybert
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they released the relaunch date yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, _Augustus_ said:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a25232/nasa-considers-astronauts-sls-launch/

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/02/nasa-looking-to-accelerate-first-crewed-orion-launch-to-as-early-as-2019/?comments=1

I see no reason why not. The DCSS and Orion have already flown unmanned together, and the modified Shuttle hardware was proven on 135 flights.

There is hardly any Shuttle hardware in SLS. The only thing I can think of is the engines, and even those are modified.

Also, the whole point of the ICPS was that it didn't need to be man-rated for EM-1 and EM-2 would use the EUS. Doing EM-1 manned means that you need to go back and do all the man-rating paperwork on the ICPS for only one flight.

Quote

Even if there is something wrong during ascent, Orion has a LES. The Shuttle flew manned on its first flight and it had no crew safety measures!

That would probably put a final nail in the coffin of the whole program though.

Quote

Makes me wonder what they'll do for EM-2 though. Maybe an Inspiration Mars-style mission?

I doubt SLS survives that long.

The whole idea looks like a desperate push to get a manned SLS flight before the next elections.

Edited by Nibb31
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, eagle92lightning said:

It will carry a lander eventually possible one of my designs (I am very optimistic)

Orion won't "carry" anything. It barely has enough dV to return from lunar orbit.

Claiming that Orion is a key part of a Mission to Mars is like saying that the dinghy carried on the Santa Maria was a key part of Columbus' expedition. If they are serious about going to Mars, they need to start designing the Santa Maria, not the dinghy.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait since when was the service module anywhere near completion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, _Augustus_ said:

The Shuttle flew manned on its first flight and it had no crew safety measures!

I know that STS-1 had ejection seats and I THINK a few missions after it had ejection seats. Don't quote me on the last part though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing remotely similar to shuttle is the engines, which themselves are different. Even the SRBs had to be modified to a good extent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So right now, the only rocket in development by nasa for manned U.S flight is the Orion and sls?

Edited by munlander1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.