Jack Joseph Kerman

Members
  • Content Count

    138
  • Joined

Community Reputation

100 Excellent

5 Followers

About Jack Joseph Kerman

  • Rank
    Nooby Veteran

Recent Profile Visitors

1,592 profile views
  1. Around 18 years, which was for a direct transfer from Kerbin to Keelon, a planet added by the mod Kerbol Origins that is insanely far away and has something like 2.7 G of gravity. The transfer in question was for a probe I sent there, which almost burned up on entry.
  2. Yes, but only the inflatable shield because otherwise it would just get in the way and make it impossible for me to land safely.
  3. Over 1,400 according to Steam, since I started playing in June 2016. Most of this was earlier on, when I played the game a lot more often than I do now. At one point, I would play over 70 hours every two weeks according to Steam, which honestly just baffles me today. Nowadays I’ll probably play 10 hours in 2 weeks, maybe even less.
  4. Yes, I do play with them enabled, mostly for the realism regarding kerbals fainting from G-force, as this adds some limiting factor to turns in maneuverable planes and re-entry velocities. Overall however, I wouldn’t say it adds that much difficulty to the game, especially with the part limits, as 40 atmospheres (which I believe is the pressure limit) is only obtainable deep underwater or when you’re about to reach 0 altitude on Jool, at which point you’re doomed anyway. The 50 G limit is negligible nearly 100% of the time, too, unless you’re attempting some crazy steep entry into an atmosphere at ludicrous speed. As far as disabling it goes, can’t you just turn it off in the difficulty settings, or is this some change I’m not aware of?
  5. Commie detected * now my post doesn’t make sense lol
  6. So what if a mod for this already exists? It’s a small, purely visual change that in no way changes the actual gameplay. A mod for something already existing shouldn’t immediately eliminate the possibility to add it to the stock game. Features from mods have already been added to the game before, so why should this be any different?
  7. To get around this problem, maybe have a setting on the module to deactivate during time warp, similar to having probe cores hibernate during warp. Once you come out of warp, the modules would start generating heat again using lots of electricity and gradually your craft would warm back up to nominal temperatures, meaning the game doesn’t have to passively manage heat at all times during flight.
  8. I may give this challenge a shot when I get back from vacation. I’ve done Eve surface missions before, but they were all done by landing at over 4000m, with ISRU and 4 kerbals in a 2.5m service bay. Definitely a new challenge for me which I’ve never tried, might go for level 3 or 4.
  9. I’m honestly all for adding decay to RTGs. Currently, as they stand, they are a free source of power with virtually zero downsides, apart from a rather high cost in career (which even then isn’t really an issue because of how late in the game you unlock them) Adding such a downside to RTGs for long missions could give players more incentive to use things such as fuel cells, which I currently forget even exist most of the time because of how overshadowed they are by RTGs and solar panels.
  10. About four or five days after I first got the game in June 2016, if we’re talking just landing successfully. That in itself took me three attempts, and I didn’t even make it back anyways as my engine was destroyed after a hard landing after I pressed shift and took a screenshot, which was the same button as throttle up.. The next day or so I did it just fine though, after I began to realize that MOAR BOOSTERS is not always the answer.
  11. I’m a madlad, I’ve done several Jool 5 missions before and two Eve returns. However, I doubt I’ll ever achieve Super Madlad because of the amount of patience it takes which I just don’t have, unfortunately. Have you seen what those people can do, it’s a whole new dimension of insane. It’s kind of like how I am skiing in real life, I’ll get down double black diamonds no problem, but will never have the skill to ski off of cliffs and crazy crap like that.
  12. Happened not that long ago, when I was attempting to dock with an asteroid station I had made to attach a module. Since the docking port was aligned in a strange way, lining up with it perfectly was near impossible. Spent something like an hour and ten or so attempts before I got liquided, kicked a chair over and went to bed. (It was around midnight at that point.) Then the very next day I docked perfectly on my first try. I’m not sure whether I should be angry or happy about that.
  13. Yay, more bugs, almost none of which will be fixed.
  14. I’ve done Mach 4 or so near sea level, but up at 16 km, using jets only I’ve reached 1800 m/s (Mach 5.25) in a jet I called the Bullet Mk2. However, even up that high the plane was barely maneuverable at all because of its dinky, triangular wings that spanned up the entire fuselage designed entirely for speed. The design consists of an extremely elongated fairing serving as a heat-resistant nose cone, behind that was a heat shield and the cockpit. I then used many long Mk2 fuel tanks with most fuel taken out of them to decrease mass.
  15. Have you upgraded your tracking station and mission control to level 2? Without that you can’t add maneuver nodes.I remember having this problem a while ago and thinking my game was broken.