Deddly

Granted, but you have to wait a little bit I wish I knew what to say in situations like this...

I was hoping for the Falcon Heavy, but that was a really nice video!

Hello and welcome! I have moved your question to the French language section because English must be used in the other areas of the forum. I hope you find the help you need! Google Translate: Bonjour et bienvenue! J'ai déplacé votre question à la section de langue française parce que l'anglais doit être utilisé dans les autres zones du forum. J'espère que vous trouverez l'aide dont vous avez besoin!

Consider this thread back on topic. The side conversation that you do not see above never happened, and if it did, it was somewhere else where it was on topic (which is where it should be continued please, not here) So MM eh? Awesome! More nyancats pls.

I love the atmosphere of mutual respect and the clean environment that is enforced by the forum rules. Without rules like we have it seems that every online discussion devolves into constant bickering, flame wars and insulting matches. Not everyone likes the "hugbox" of the KSP forums, but there is the rest of the internet for people who want to have total freedom to use bad language, insulting comments etc.. Here in this little corner of the internet, we have a generally peaceful place, which attracts a whole different crowd. I myself avoid most public discussion forums and it took me a long time to get involved here. It was only when I noticed how different things are here that I wanted to be a part of the community, and I know I'm not the only one.

That's really quite something. KSP --> art. How long did it take you to make it? I particularly like the novel use of mining drills as decorative piping.

What was the post about?

There are quite a few structural/decorative parts in Making History. The new Vernor looks nice! It's still going to be a pain to stick them everywhere needed for full RCS control on large vessels, but the visuals are definitely a lot better than the old one, and of course that's the whole point of this upgrade.

I'm not a fan of OP torque either, and I never use it to stabilise craft. However, there is a place for it. For example, reaction wheels exist in real life, but their torque is much too low to be useful in a game. I don't want to have to add RCS to a satellite/telescope to change its orientation when a real one could do that with reaction wheels. As for this engine, I like it and I'd also love to see an in-line attachable one too, as others have said.

Good thinking. But what temperature is needed to make it glow? "hydrazine decomposes on contact with the catalyst. The decompositionis highly exothermic and produces a 1000 °C (1800 °F) gas" (according to Wikipedia).

I used to like driving up the stairs in the rover you can see in my avatar

I think it's really great to see a continued commitment to the console releases, thanks for keeping us up to date!

Uh oh! A couple of posts had to get squished from this thread. People do sometimes say things that come across as unkind, but the rest of us to well to assume the best and just let it go. Rule-breaking posts can be reported, but let's not all pile on someone for an unfortunate choice of words. Is that OK?

<Moderator mode activated> Instead of generally crapping on Squad or defending them from said general crap, it is now time to please get back to the topic: The new engine. Like it? Hate it? Constructive feedback and suggestions for this part? That's all cool, go for it. EDIT: A few posts were removed for the above reason

Have you seen the internal structure?