Jump to content

BudgetHedgehog

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,216

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by BudgetHedgehog

  1. BudgetHedgehog
    Using KSS, how do I redefine what KSS actually is? My station, Prosperity, was going ok, but I messed up expanding it and I fear going near it so I want to send up a replacement. Complicating matters is the fact that I have a contract I accepted before I messed up for some tourists to visit it - my worry is that if I do redefine the KSS, the contract will still require the old deprecated (possibly exploded) station (perhaps this is more of a question for TourismPlus, come to think of it). So yeah, how do I redefine what the KSS vessel is and what do I do about my contract? It's my own fault entirely, I freely admit that, but I need help :/
  2. BudgetHedgehog
    I noticed in the OP that Stock Part Revamp is supported - I thought that already had reflections?
  3. BudgetHedgehog
    Cheers buddy, I can't wait to see them
  4. BudgetHedgehog
    Line 47 reads "%meshes = Habiitat_MK1 Window". Double i intentional? If you can, Stockalike Station Parts Expansion would be awesome. I keep dreaming of that large cupola..
  5. BudgetHedgehog
    3 posts above you, mate. Also, on the last page:
  6. BudgetHedgehog
    Wow, that's a big update! Have you got a list of known issues for it? I want to get back to using KK and KerbinSide and I don't want to report stuff you already know about.
  7. BudgetHedgehog
    Hi tajampi, I found a funny little bug for you while bug hunting another mod, but I don't actually know if it's fixable. The engine lighting is applied to planets when you're far away from them. Here's a Mainsail lighting up Minmus I don't know if it's fixable, or if it's even worth fixing (who even uses a Mainsail in space?!), but I just thought you should know regardless.
  8. BudgetHedgehog
    Here is ferram4's explanation on this: I too, with FAR installed, have experienced very warm kerbals upon going on EVA.
  9. BudgetHedgehog
    . I am using Kopernicus though (which actually, now you mention it, does cause some weirdness with the PQS of Minmus - remind me to message Proot about that). Gimme a couple of days to check this, I'll let you know.. something either way.
  10. BudgetHedgehog
    Which is provided by a different and discrete mod. Stock KSP lacks such a feature, as does TE right now. I don't think the solution to player confusion is to 'download this entirely different mod'. Granted, a large portion of the userbase has KER/MJ/VOID etc installed, but there'll always be outliers. If this route were chosen, a simple 'added cost/weight/Isp penalty' field in the context menu would be enough for people to see the side effects. Having KER etc installed would provide more in depth info, but it wouldn't be required.
  11. BudgetHedgehog
    I'd go for the first or second - unless told by TE, players won't know or notice that their Isp is going down/weight is increasing, possibly resulting in confusion. I'd make it a very limited change though, possibly 15% to increase usability. The second one would be ok as well, increased heat generation makes sense, but that said, I guess once it gets to the stage of launch where the heat generated is becoming too much, you're way past the need for full throttle anyway.
  12. BudgetHedgehog
    Cheers chap - I never got round to getting back to you, but in the limited playtime I had with the dev build, I hadn't noticed any more duplications. I very much appreciate you fixing this
  13. BudgetHedgehog
    I'm going to go ahead and confirm this - TweakableEverything especially doesn't like it. Once I reach 6km, the camera loses tracking of the vessel and I break up and basically, I don't get to go to space today. [ModuleTweakableJettison] Skipping problematic jettisonModule; this may be a part design problem jettisonModule=microEngine (ModuleJettison) jettisonModule.jettisonName=TankButt jettisonModule.jettisonTransform=null NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object at FerramAerospaceResearch.FARPartGeometry.GeometryModification.StockJettisonTransformGeoUpdater..ctor (.ModuleJettison engineFairing, FerramAerospaceResearch.FARPartGeometry.GeometryPartModule geoModule) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at FerramAerospaceResearch.FARPartGeometry.GeometryPartModule.SetupIGeometryUpdaters () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at FerramAerospaceResearch.FARPartGeometry.GeometryPartModule.Start () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 (Filename: Line: -1) NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object at ModuleJettison.LateUpdate () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 The latter is repeated ad infinitum until I get annoyed enough to close KSP.
  14. BudgetHedgehog
    No idea why, post your output log please.
  15. BudgetHedgehog
    I'll just leave these here: FAR doesn't touch the thermal system at all, it's stock being stupid that's causing the problem (it's possible to get craft to overheat and explode, while stationary on the runway due to this bug, in a stock game).
  16. BudgetHedgehog
    Yes. 10 chars
  17. BudgetHedgehog
    I'm getting this a lot too, EVE Overhaul installed as well.
  18. BudgetHedgehog
    To be fair, a few things are stock bugs that mods exacerbate or reveal. A lot of users blamed FAR for overheating parts, when it's stock silliness that is the root cause. High res textures and loads of parts equal OOM crash, sure that's the mods fault, but only indirectly. The direct fault is that the program A, loads everything at the start (Squad wrote that asset loader) and B, can't access over 3.2GB of RAM and crashes when it tries to (engine limitation, I know, but it's not the mods fault. Get enough stock textures and parts and it'll happen in a stock game). The point is, some bugs/issues don't manifest themselves in a stock game, but the underlying code/reason for them is still there.
  19. BudgetHedgehog
    Did you get round to fixing the monolith texts? (0° 38' 24" S, 279° 13' 59" E, the second closest to KSC) I'm thinking that if they're all fixed and above ground now, then the completed message doesn't make a lot of sense.. But then, I haven't actually checked them all yet..
  20. BudgetHedgehog
    I see.. so it's like the old EVA fuel mod - take resources from the ship when leaving, put back into ship when boarding. That makes more sense. Cheers
  21. BudgetHedgehog
    How does one get electricity to kerbals then? If you're removing their EC, fair enough, but not including a way to actually generate or transfer EC basically removes the whole point of EVA transmission.
  22. BudgetHedgehog
    Ooooh nice stuff! RE FAR support: as long as the colliders are sensible, it should work just fine. If it looks clean and streamlined, it is
  23. BudgetHedgehog
    I'd say a single 1.25m mount, but you'd have to make sure that engines placed there won't have their tankbutt sticking out the side (grumble grumble shouldn't even be there in the first place grumble).
  24. BudgetHedgehog
    EngineThrustControl by HoneyFox. From memory, no GUI, it's all config based but it does taper off thrust with time.
  25. BudgetHedgehog
    Link please?
×
×
  • Create New...