Jump to content

klgraham1013

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,255

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by klgraham1013

  1. klgraham1013
    The most visible and obvious bug isn't being talked about right now. Check back later.
  2. klgraham1013
    Maybe even something like "check that all IVAs are working" or "make sure all the fairings are the right size."
  3. klgraham1013
    Fingers crossed 1.4 gets it's act together than.
  4. klgraham1013
    Surface tablet update?
  5. klgraham1013
    I'm not sure I could play pure stock KSP for 8 hours a day. That alone would get frustrating, let alone looking for and reporting bugs.
  6. klgraham1013
    This.
  7. klgraham1013
    [makes sure his 1.3.1 install is in a safe place; quarantined away from the internet]
  8. klgraham1013
    ...and here I just want completely random Kerbals from the start.
  9. klgraham1013
    I'm trying to think of the last repeatedly-asked-for suggestion that made it into the game...
  10. klgraham1013
    Good news. Just say the banner saying they're looking for QA engineers.
  11. klgraham1013
    Man. My decision to stick with 1.3.1 continues to look better and better.
  12. klgraham1013
    From what I understand, the models were fixed, but not the actual offset thrust.
  13. klgraham1013
    It is completely reasonable to blame someone for using the wrong tool for the job. I will quote myself for clarity: As far as I know, nothing was forcing the Unity upgrade. What would I have them do? Fix the final big bugs in 1.3, and stick a fork in it. Finish the game. Don't release an update with actual eye rolling bugs like typos that eliminate IVAs or make fairings the wrong size. Don't release an update that breaks one of the core gameplay loops of your game: Using landing legs to land things on other planets. Just finish this game.
  14. klgraham1013
    Let's not start with the "blame Unity" excuses again. Squad made the choice to update the engine. Squad choose to release a version with bugs easily spotted after playing for 5 minutes. This has nothing to do with Unity.
  15. klgraham1013
    If someone smarter than me came up with a good balance change, I'd love to see it. Even just a nerf to the air breathing side in exchange for a buff to the closed cycle side. I'll be keeping an eye on this thread, and what the community is thinking.
  16. klgraham1013
    Having unlocks for the sake of having unlocks isn't always the best idea. Gameplay and player requirements should always be taken into consideration. I feel that this is basic information for craft flight. Denying the player of it simply to add another form of player progression doesn't sit well with me.
  17. klgraham1013
    Actually similar to my thoughts besides the game-ifying difficulty curve. As long as there's actual thought put into things. That's all I ask for. It doesn't always feel like that with KSP.
  18. klgraham1013
    Each body, in order of dV travel cost, should provide a new, unique, and progressively more difficult challenge for the player. Unfortunately, I feel like only a minimal amount of thought was put into this. As it is, difficulty in KSP is relegated to arbitrary rules and unlocks in career mode.
  19. klgraham1013
    Honestly, if the first thing you do when modeling a door isn't checking the dimensions compared to the thing that would use said door...
  20. klgraham1013
    Once all the bugs are fixed. We should all stop buying buggy products.
  21. klgraham1013
    You're assuming they put enough thought into it to consider scale.
  22. klgraham1013
    Man. This version is great expect for that one broken part that breaks one of the main parts gameplay!
  23. klgraham1013
    KSP2 as I see it as a guarantee and the likely reason Take Two bought KSP.
  24. klgraham1013
    At this point, lets just get a stable version and be done with it.
  25. klgraham1013
    1.3.1. Most stable version once you install the World Stabilizer mod.
×
×
  • Create New...