sal_vager

The official community bug tracker, info for which is in the support stickies

inigma, it's a really good craft with a cool vid, I think it'd be a disservice to the community to remove it, and a craft file would be welcome. You do invite us to fly it, after all: I see you added a lot of text about community crafts to the post, maybe in the hope that it'd help add weight to the argument to have the thread moved, regardless, it's a craft thread and it's best placed in the Exchange, but I do strongly suggest you open a thread in Suggestions and Development Discussion regarding your community craft submission idea and link your excellent shuttle to that new thread. General Discussion is not the place for either thread however

I'd prefer distinct parts as well, rather than stretchyfairings as they could be used in novel ways to build new and exciting craft, rather than just used to shroud satellites.

Ahh so Google is to blame for necro posting? This thread hasn't seen any activity since August 2013. I agree that it's unlikely we'll see a change to the tree system this late in development, though it does not rule out the possibility that it could happen with 1.1, 1.2, or so on.

It's cool isn't it?

Yeah we know Mike, but Squad aren't about at the weekends, they have to see family sometimes

Yeah I set this on purpose as merging posts is a huge drain on moderator time, but I do understand that people want to break up an OP with sections which is exactly why I also set up (with some help) the Goto line tags To really see these in action, check out the overhauled Linux thread

Could be a bad file somewhere, have you tried verifying the game cache in Steam?

Someone needs to send them a dictionary

Might be hamachi as that is known to cause issues with KSP, or maybe active texture manager if you're using that, can you post your logs so we can take a look?

Want to revert from 0.90.0? If using the store copy, go to your download page and download the last version. If using Steam, right click KSP in the client, select Properties, you'll see a tab for Betas, select "last stable version"

You mean the research button? That can happen if your screen resolution has changed, or the resolution used by KSP, check your KSP settings and your OSX screen settings, ensure both are at least 1024x768

The poll isn't that great, sorry Hooj, but there's no option for people who think KSP will be ready for 1.0, the poll makes it look like the only choice is to take 0.90.0 at face value.

Wish I could move your post Hooj but there's no tools to do that :/

Well, sorry guys, the OP asked to have this closed, if you want to discuss this it'll have to be in another thread.

We already knew not everyone would like it, all the old threads on the subject are testament to that, which was why it was on the WNTS list.

We just don't want people yelling misogyny Parkaboy, there's no place for that here. Hey look CVM, a player suggestion added to the game

Wait for the Squadcast Nitrous

We'll not have any gender arguments please guys and gals, you know female Kerbals have been asked for for a long time, well now it's happening for real

So much rep in so short a time, it's unprecedented

Can't really explain the node things better then that sorry, you'd need a developer, but the tree style craft files aren't really designed with attaching to multiple nodes in mind.

Ding Ding Ding we have a winner! And Squad will be winners too just as soon as their luck changes on the slot machines (jk)

Part clipping is enabled by default in 0.90.0, what this means is that no checks are made to see if a part is inside another part, it will attach if there is a valid node or surface. Parts will not attach to a node that is already in use. The part clipping option in the debug menu enables nodes to be used by more than one part, this causes problems in the craft files and with resource pathing, and is known to break, so it is recommended that you do not use that option. That's is, not complicated

You'd need a time machine to find out for absolutely certain TeeGee.

That'd be against the rules though Yukon