sal_vager

Very nice Darren9, that scores you 137 points

That would put you on the Cheater McCheatypants scoreboard, you know if you're cheating or not, and the rest of us can probably figure it out, such as if you put your plane on an escape trajectory

The tow plane would be part of your airborne vessel, so you'd have to add that, but I'm sure there's other ways to get a craft in the air Oh and Kerbins radius is 600km, so.... 600 * 2 * pi / 2 = 1,884.95559215387 which is the furthest you can be from the KSC. You'd get -8,115.04440784613 points

Perhaps it's time you rebuilt it UpsilonAerospace? What you lose on dimensions you might make up for on distance

"Build the biggest/fastest/highest X !" No. This is a smaller, simpler challenge, for fun rather than fame, it was inspired by this, this and this. Build an itty bitty, teeny tiny aeroplane... And fly it as far as you're able... And enjoy yourself... Goto Stock Scoreboard. - Goto Modded Scoreboard. This is a points based challenge and you rate yourself, it's on an honour system but if you are suspected or proven to be cheating there is a separate scoreboard for you, but you really should try to be inventive. The points are gained like so: [table=width: 500] [tr] [td]Enter the challenge.[/td] [td]100 Points![/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Fly a kilometre.[/td] [td]1 Point for each whole kilometre.[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Carry a passenger.[/td] [td]1 Point for each Kerbal.[/td] [/tr] [/table] And points are lost... [table=width: 500] [tr] [td]Too heavy.[/td] [td]-1 Point for each 0.1 mass including fuel.[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Too wide.[/td] [td]-1 Point for each 0.1 width.[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Too tall.[/td] [td]-1 Point for each 0.1 height.[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Too long.[/td] [td]-1 Point for each 0.1 length.[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Too complex.[/td] [td]-1 Point for each part.[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]We're doing this live.[/td] [td]-50 Points for no Kerbal.[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]If only I could fly.[/td] [td]-100 Points if you travel less than 1 kilometre.[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]By any means necessary.[/td] [td]-10000 Points if any part of your journey is by means other than airborne.[/td] [/tr] [/table] And here is the Zunzuncito in flight. 25 points for my aeroplane plus 33 points for distance travelled earns me 58 points, a modest total for a modest challenge. And if you'd like to show you participated, Raincrafter has a nice little signature badge for you here. Stock Scoreboard. Starhawk and the Itty Bitty scored 11,235 Points! (Obsession Award) Tank2333's Bee18 Hornet X3 scored 6,940 Points! Bluejayek and the Pipsqueek earn 5900 Points! Captain Vlad's JA-2A Sparrow Turbo earns him 4,824 Points! (stock craft, modded install) Jean Deaux's ]Wisp 2 scores 1611 Points! Jakalth with the new and improved AquaGnat2 (63% more Gnattitude!) scores a whopping 1375 Points! Points!xendelaar and The Arrow score 1173 points! GraviTykillz and the fly score 1161 Points! the_bT and the PP-2 score 958 Points! Tritan20's Flea scores 906 points! Squiggsy's Pigmy-4 scores 710 points! Red Iron Crown's Micro X-Wing scores 535 Points! Jakalth and the Aqua Gnat scored 462 Points! Torquimedes and the Kurchick scored ]375 Points! @Maverick_aus, scoring 638 pints with the Cricket! Bluejayek and his Pipsqueek score 361 Points! FleshJeb's I've Got My Ion You! scores 309 Points! fenya's midge1 scores 194 Points! waterlubber's Meeshtop scores 116.635 points! Darren9 with the mini1, scoring 137 Points! (stock craft, modded install) sdj64 and the Flamingo scored 134 Points! Lhathron the Elf and the Honeybee score 68 Points! sal_vager (me) flies the Zunzuncito to score 58 Points! Munstation takes to the skies with his Wing-pack Mk I scoring 49 Points! TechnicalFool, 17 points with the teenyplane1! insert_name takes to the skies with the gnat, scoring 16 points! RAINCRAFTER and the Tiny Plane scored 6 Points! Batz_10K flying the TinyPlane scored a whopping -20 Points! The Bard takes to the air in The Starling, scoring -25 Points! Radon86's Skyler-1 gets -27 Points! (No Kerbal)(Best Try Award) FlipNascar and the kerplunk score -5628 points! Modded Scoreboard. pellinor's Vtol V5 scored 4,875 Points! Wanderfound has another go with the Kerbodyne Nano and scores 3,702 Points! hoioh and his Rutan_VariEze scored 2,234 Points! Damaske's kopwith Kamel scored 1,448 Points! Tank2333 and the Bayplane 3000 scoring 1,358 Points! Slam_Jones's Fire Hawk Jr scores 545 Points! Kagame flies the Bitsypie Mk7 to earn 95.523 points! Lego8_bit flies the tiny Lean and mean to score 4.63 points! Wanderfound and his Kerbodyne Nano scored -10 Points! (Best Try Award) Cheater McCheatypants Scoreboard. Bluejayek's Ion't do rules! breaks the record with 50,060,400,166 Points! (Smart A.S.S Award) GoSlash27's ]KrakBadger comes in second with -100000 Points! (By any means necessary) Goto Top

I'll stick with Munnies

Well, I have some good news Percival, the Linux numpad issue is all Unity's fault but thankfully they've gotten round to fixing it. Unity 4.6.1 release notes Now all we have to do is wait for 1.0, Squad is bound to update Unity Oh and numrow buttons for action groups works fine, there may be some other cause for that.

"Why don't you do X?" "Um, we're only on M.....?" I'm sure they're getting round to it, it's not exactly the end of Kerbin if LV-N's also heat and expel liquid oxygen

You can also try -force-d3d11 For more information on Unity command line arguments see here. For bugs relating to the Unity3D game engine see here.

There's already a major screenshot thread that was moved to Fanworks, sorry.

Because it's a game nikolay, and the LV-N isn't a reactor, it's supposed to use the heat from sub-critical uranium to heat the propellant directly. So Kerbals just pump their usual liquid fuel and oxidiser mix through the engine, why waste perfectly good reaction mass?

Sound is being overhauled already, so no need to suggest it

The suggested feature is already implemented, /thread.

Leszek, it's correct, if you start the x32_64 binary you'll be using the 64 bit version, but there's nothing in the game to tell you this. The big change is in how much RAM you can use with it, it'll easily go over 4gigs and that's why it's popular with people using a lot of addons. Speed varies a great deal but making sure your graphics driver is up to date definitely helps

This thread is a complete train wreck. Closing.

Squad can't work on Windows x64, it either works or it doesn't, and for too many people it doesn't. Unity4x is mainly a 32bit environment with some experimental x64 support, and with Unity releasing 5 it's not likely they will ever fix the limitations of 4. Unity5 at least has a 64bit editor and debugging tools so even seeing a bug should become possible, though there's still no guarantee of fixing it. Plus any move from 4 to 5 is bound to introduce new issues, not just for Squad but for any current Unity4 user upgrading their project to 5. We'll don't have much choice but to wait and see. So it's not really disappointing that "Squad won't work on 64 bit Windows", to use a car analogy it's unfortunate that Squads car has an engine that's fine in one gear, broken in another, but all the tools to fix that gear are only available in the next model.

I guess my plane is too baller for tetryds, he's pretending it isn't there, maybe I should have broken one of his rules?

Well there's trees, grass, cacti and one dead Kraken, that's it, and there are no plans to add any other aliens to the game. Please see here and here.

Yes of course, they are called Kerbals

No bumping Aver9geJoe

Try it now.

Threads merged, Unity5 is still in beta

I'll be the first to admit that when it comes to clever designs, my brain nope's out and I end up sticking an engine under some tanks under a pod. My aeroplanes aren't much better unless I start playing with the offset tool, but they still consist of an engine behind some tanks behind a cockpit. So it's no surprise that my entry here looks so tame, but the rules say I can't change it. Which is a shame because I spent all morning making it better... It's a lot more fun now and at least looks a bit more interesting, even if it's not exactly pretty, but what it loses in the beauty contest, it makes up for in the acrobatics department. In spades... So have fun, I did The Ham Sandwich 2, Hamageddon!

Hi kimbokins, we don't usually like to see thread bumping but I can see it was necessary in this case, can you give us more info on the issue please, see the sticky threads on how to find your logs and post them, also pics would be good as we don't know what parts you are having trouble with

I've never been one for designs as wacky as the above, you can blame a lack of imagination, I like planes to look like planes. So here's my "general mucking about" plane, I use it for flying between the buildings of the KSC, basic aerobatics and trips to the islands and mountains, it's not fast or long legged but it has bags of lift, essential for leisurely flights with granny, gliding and avoiding the R&D buildings at 50 metres. I know anything can fly badly in FAR but this plane is designed for fun, so I'd appreciate it if you can try retaining the flight dynamics of this one, oh and I like the way it looks just as it is It relies on a careful balance and centralised fuel, see if you can parkour off the side of the VAB, I know it is able to do it The Ham Sandwich.