Jump to content

SG Aero

Members
  • Posts

    880
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SG Aero

  1. Yeah. I would like to see someone set up an orbital mauever with only Juno’s.
  2. Yeah. About what I expected. I stopped using that missile long ago, as it’s way too part count heavy.
  3. Here. Try this. It's a little more heavy duty, as it's basically a cluster missile. Use the vector for acceleration the whole time and then just before impact hit space the launch the I-Beams. This is a little outdated, but still works great. The ship it's on is nothing special. I just sent it for the missiles. Tell me how your new armor fares against this. MWAH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Cough. Stereotypical cough. https://www.dropbox.com/s/zcjqowbrpw8e8cm/SC Obliteration.craft?dl=0 @panzer1b
  4. Also yeah the cargo bays are weirdly strong. They don’t have that high of impact tolerance, and considering my torpedo can get going up to 100 m/s in 150 meters, it should easily be able to kill it. I think the panels might actually be acting as a shield. Either way, I could probably kill it with two hits to the same area.
  5. Yeah for such a small torpedo it can pack a punch. You could also test an old but somewhat devastating torpedo I made a while back. It’s like a shotgun missile. It has a bunch of I-beams attaches to a decoupler, and it’s main thrust comes from a vector. Usually shreds stuff, though it’s due makes it somewhat impractical.
  6. Sure. I didn’t get to testing your ship last night and I’m not at my pc rn but I’ll get it to you when I can. EDIT: Okay here is the link. I haven't updated the craft, and the kerbnet update broke it as it's promarily prode controlled. I'll test it on your ship. https://www.dropbox.com/s/nsw8ci586i41u43/SC Void.craft?dl=0
  7. Let me have a shot at it. I have a light ap round that has been tested against heavy armor and usually punches a hole straight through. Usually if it bounces off I can come back for a second hit.
  8. Please see above in reference to the monorail. It would just be a rail guided plane, not a rover. I am very picky about what people call things.
  9. Actually there are no wheels so it wouldn’t be a rover. It would be a rocket propelled sledge held up by a monorail.
  10. Would it be out of the question to build a very cheap monorail? Not that I could do it. I don’t have the building extender thing.
  11. What? That’s crazy talk. You need to add a fuel tank too. Then it’s a plane. Also modular grid segments aren’t strong enough to act as skis. Also they are way to bulky.
  12. Wait.... you don’t start out with any controllable wings or sas modules without upgrading tech... The only way I can think of to make liftoff and landing horizontal would be to use girders as skis, but those aren’t starting tech either.
  13. It’s not. You have to do some file editing or use a mod
  14. I actually can’t get it to work. It when I click add the button changes shape but nothing else happens
  15. Yay! Also yeah I loved those ski-speeders. *pushes on gas* *section of floor falls out* ”What the..?”
  16. Ummm? Do you mean the most physical wings or just the most wing parts?
  17. You read fact books while simultaneously hacking a website and playing KSP.
  18. Nah. Well just do a orbital strike. Much more precise.
  19. SG Aero

    Goat

    Hmmmm.... I smell a dictatorship. I should know, as my goat army is about to conquer North Korea to start one. Also answer the question.
×
×
  • Create New...