data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c581/1c58198490e263bd696eb175cd631c83d5132c95" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a190e/a190e8aea5bb0c4f9e043819acb48180b812b021" alt=""
jost
Members-
Posts
254 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by jost
-
I might be wrong (not using it at the moment because in snarkiverse it's not really needed imho) but this should do the trick: @PART[kerbalism-greenhouse]:NEEDS[ProfileDefault]:AFTER[KerbalismDefault] // Default Kerbalism greenhouse { @MODULE[Greenhouse] { @crop_rate = 0.00000000005 OUTPUT_RESOURCE { name = Food // Change by KingofNowhere // rate = 0.000003190104 rate = 0.0000063796 } } } I think I have it from one of @king of nowhere mission report and this thread: The latter contains also configuration for several greenhouses from mods.
-
First I appreciate that you went through to tell the goverment your boss abused the program. More people should do it in such cases, so hats off! Second I don't think yours and Nates cases are the same. You didn't broke the contract with the goverment, your boss did. While Nate would break his NDA if he get too much in detail. In your case you were practically doing the goverment and other companys a favour since one bad actor couldn't abuse the program any more. But I don't believe that most companies would like to hire somebody with a known track record for failing projects and generate even more bad PR afterwards by talking too much about it. But they are! You and I can despite it as much as we want but that's the way it is. Hate the game, not the Player.
-
Yes and Meyer told the press that their order books are full and their financing were fully secure. Until Covid hit the cruise enterprises. My point being is that every Business might kill every project ( even fully funded ones ) if circumstances change and to the outside World everything will be said to be fine, nothing to see here, yadayadayada. Until it's not
-
Every software development project is funded until it's not. I mean during the seven years there were quite a bit of changes in the world (be it political, economical or in other regards (covid)) so it's not totally wrong to assume that the beginning budget plus reasonable extra expenses will cut it. Until shtp and your funders decide to redraw their funding. This is not limited to the game industry btw. One of the greatest German shipyards (Meyer Werft Papenburg) usually doesn't get funding from their customers (which are mostly enterprises running cruise ships), they need to complete and deliver the ship before they get any penny. How are they doing it? By going to banks and ask for financing loans. If everything works fine they can build and deliver the ship, get their money and pay the loan back to the bank. Now during and after covid many of their customers got into financial trouble (since nobody wanted or was allowed to go on cruises) and cancelled their orders. Without orders the banks also didn't wanted to give them further loans, resulting in their announcment that if not something happens they would have to file for bankruptcy. Since many jobs were at stake and Germans navy don't want to relay to much on foreign suppliers the Government rescued them (for some conditions like moving back their seat to Germany (they went to Luxemburg some years ago due to work relation laws and taxes). I'm quite sure Meyer always said: Our next curise ships are completly funded (and they were, things always worked liked described earlier). Until they wasn't. Now Meyer had some advantage many other industries don't have: It's existence is deemed (by our politicians at least) important for the military capabilities of the German state so it wasn't very hard to find a majority of law makers to agree to rescuing them. Gaming industry however is not, how many tanks can you make by funding video games development? And not you get the wrong idea: Since politics is not allowed here, I won't comment whether I think it's a good or bad decision by our beloved government but it was the first example I could think of that claiming to be financial stable although you are only as long as your investors agree, is not limited to the video gaming industry
-
And risk a lawsuit because of it? Especially after such an epic blunder which might damage or destroy my career for a long time or completly I definitively woudn't risk my only hope to ever get a job again by breaking a NDA just to "address the community" of a video game. And I'm not only talking about the video game industry (that ship is propably sailed for him!): Any company won't hire people who are not only known for a failed project (which might still have a good explaination ) but also for breaking contracts. Failing at a project is one thing and often enough not the sole fault of one person. Breaking a contract is the decision of the person breaking it and obviously will hurt this persons long-time prospect on the job market. Apologizing to the team members is a different thing though (calls at 2 am seriously?!? I would quit on the spot if my boss would do such a thing in a non-emergency situation!) if he didn't manage that on their last common days at IG this would be quite a shame. But in the end it's between and his former team members. You or I don't really have a stake in it. Some folks think that this community "simping" is pathetic. I think it's quite more pathetic to expect people to risk lawsuits and their means of existence due to video games communities of all things. Nobody needs to like it but you can'T expect people to behave even more self-destructing than they already have.
-
Shouldn't this be chmod -wx *.warc?
-
Negative things about the game, development, and the silence
jost replied to Izny's topic in KSP2 Discussion
You wouldn't care too about "the community" of your former employers product after signing a NDA. It's silly to assume that somebody would risk a court battle just to "defend their honour" to a community whose most toxic members wouldn't accept this defense anyhow. What would be the point in this? -
Tryharder didn't forbid to fly to space. Thus it should be possible to Orbit Witze the planes to space, transfer fuel and continue the circumvention. Still not trivial so hats off to anybody who achieve this
- 7 replies
-
- jeb not dying today
- jeb
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
It might be a better idea to look in their mods to figure out what they are doing and starting a thread asking for help if you get stuck
-
Concerning compression tools: zstd is considered a good compromise between speed and compression ratio, maybe worth a tree if time ends up being an issue.
-
I wouldn‘t call regulation nonsense, without it you end in a death trap like Oceangates Titan sub. Apart from this you are spot on: Stuff is expensive due to the needed staff and regulation thus reusing isn‘t the good idea people think it is
-
I'm not sure I get your point. Can you elborate please?
-
So every guy or girl who is responsible for the cringe and lies messing up my Youtube or spotify streaming should loose their Job? Don't get me wrong: I would love to crash the PR/advertising industry and every Coke sniffing "creative mind" who makes their results the intelligence-insulting crap they are. But I doubt that this is possible ( even the so called socialist states had and have their Propaganda departments) and most people would agree that my peace of mind is worth destroying the jobs of everyone in the advertising/pr industry.
-
For those that wish to explain their frustration to Steam
jost replied to Stevie_D's topic in KSP2 Discussion
I don't care about take two and it's shareholders. But I care a lot about techworkers who lost their jobs since I'm a tech guy myself and can relate how they are feeling right now. And I don't care at all about "angry gamers" aka male entitled Teenagers who call for review bombing the profiles of former KSP2 Staff on linkedin/xing etc. This in incredible lame ( because it shows they have way to much time and obviouvsly no way to spend it ) and dumb ( companys will know that the applicants were part of KSP2 in any case) at the same time. These "consumers advocats" need to grow up and be quiet, sorry, not sorry. -
The Ultimate Jool 5 Challenge Continued
jost replied to JacobJHC's topic in KSP1 Challenges & Mission ideas
Thanks for your service and thanks to kingofnowhere for taking over -
Did we discover nuclear technology “too early”
jost replied to awsumguy76801's topic in Science & Spaceflight
The Wikipedia articles on the Uranprojekt are quite enlightening: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=German_nuclear_program_during_World_War_II&diffonly=true Even more interesting are the Transkription of the talk of impridoned German scientists envolved in the Uranprojekt: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Epsilon They show that ( imho luckily) they did have quite some failure in estamting the needed amount of Uran, needed devices etc. But in the end if sonething don't work you mess around until you find sonething that works. -
Did we discover nuclear technology “too early”
jost replied to awsumguy76801's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Nope, nukes and nuclear Power were the application of the scientific knowledge of that day, discovered düring the five decades before. In the end if the USA wouldn't been first, the soviets or axis would have done it. Luckily the german nuclear program wasn't very advanced since they lacked funds ( due to wartime) and their approach wasn't practical on an industrial scale. But at some point they would also been at the same stage. -
Colonizing the kerbolar system (ussr playtrough)
jost replied to rapcool999's topic in KSP1 Mission Reports
Nice pics and great report. I'm just curious: Did you dock the plane to the Station or were the kerbals transferred via EVA? -
I don't get it: Why is the (non-)use of an Autopilot relevant for the question whether Nate did a good job as a creative director? As far I know this role needs a certain skill set. People can be good in a game and suck in a leadership role and vice versa. But I also don't get why people would play KSP to engage in air combat ( there are way better options ) so what do I know?
-
They are propably forbidden to do it.
-
In which universe c-level gets punished for missmanagement? Or do you mean the developers, comunity management and remaining people of IG? Nate works at PD now and I doubt that he started a carribian vacation on his first day there. Concerning developers and community management: Why should people loose their basis of income due to a failed EA Video game? Especially ( like community management ) if they can not really be blamed? It's not something like blowing up a nuclear power plant or even VW diesel gate. It never ceases to amaze me what problems gamers have. If such a thing is troubling you you are better off than most people in any country in this World. No reason to feel bad but also no reason to be mad
-
There is a thread on it: Tldnr: You need to find enough people to fund a lawsuit. Sonebody talked with a lawyer who saw a potential case in it. But it would need a langer team, a retainer of 10000 bucks and enough people to fund the ongoing charges. Even then the publushers legal departement is quite big so it might still end up with gaining nothing except fees. With other words: As frustrating as it is I'm afraid you can't do very much about it except you havecto much money you need to burn
-
Couldn't ESA buy KSP2 and continue funding and developing it?
jost replied to Dinlink's topic in KSP2 Discussion
European tax payer and ksp Fan here: Although I like KSP a lot I like using taxes for things like Rosetta or the mercury probe even more. And ESA is quite good in outreach: In fact during college I knew some physics students who designed parts of the Experiments as part of their thesis. Others were invited to watch the rocket launch. -
More developers without a Job = More developers who agree with lower salaries