Zaffre

Oh hello! That's great, thank you. I'm gonna hear back on what's changed with Kopernicus since I last tinkered with it and when I find the time I'll add this to the update whenever I get around to it. Oh good, I'll look at checking that out.

Hey there all. It's been a little while since I've done or said anything in regards to the mod. I had gotten severely burnt out after working on this and let it go to avoid the burnout physically manifesting, growing tired of some of the attitudes in the KSP userbase, and last but not least in anticipation of KSP2 rendering KSP1 irrelevant. As we all know by now KSP2 is officially a bust and we're stuck what we've got. If I can get back into the game or ride a welcoming wave of motivation after so long, I may bring myself to fix and give a minor update to the mod here as I try to rediscover and come back to the game. That being said I'm not sure if it's worth the time sink and hassle of dealing with jank. If there's still interest, let me know and perhaps that can help me out. Fracktastic. I'm not sure if that's the forum's fault or the Discord hosting deciding to be uncooperative. That'll be annoying to replace, I think most of the images I had were deleted from my machine a while ago for space and I don't use the Discords that the images were original hosted on.

It will not be missed! T2 actually improved something by removing themselves from it no less.

Though we have no word, I think it'd be good to be proactive with positive messages asking T2 or making it clear that the forum is an invaluable resource for an otherwise betrayed community. Should the message(s) be gotten across, it's possible they could use that as an opportunity for PR that isn't terrible in the wake of KSP2's circus of flaming fish. Win-win. Regarding what is essentially heckling the company, T2 is not Valve and I do not trust most of the KSP fanbase to not go too far or approach from an appropriate point of attack. Not that I possess any like or ambivalence for T2.

Well this is infuriating. I'm glad to see that some efforts at preservation and community fallbacks are being made courtesy of the other thread. I hope this place gets to stick around, I had to live with the practical death of the Minecraft forums and that was difficult on myself personally and watching the splintering effect it had on the community. Reddit and Discord are no places to have sustained discussion or community in the way that forums can. It's already been said but I'll second props to the forum staff here, some of you have stuck around for a long time and not getting paid for dealing with drama and laying out the rules is going to grind on you at least a little.

What a disappointing final slap in the face. I'm glad I never bought the game but the game and the studio have been nothing but consistent, thorough letdowns. I was hoping I'd see a polished, up to date, and expanded KSP game. Unless another studio takes it up or comes out with another game like it, it looks like that won't be happening.

Funny timing, that. I was just wondering what the status of Long March 9 was and I found out about LM10. It's a shame that LM9 is on the back burner but it looks like they want to learn from LM10 first and apply that knowledge to LM9. I was quite pleasantly surprised to see that Long March 10 may fly relatively soon. Waiting for SLS and Starship has felt like watching paint dry in a tropical swamp.

If the colony update pulls through I may actually get this game. Fingers crossed.

I never got around to playing this despite all the observation. I really ought to. It looks great, Star. It's changed a lot since first inception.

On first look, these requirements are truly atrocious. I suspect that these are very conservative estimates made with enough margin to comfortably run it. KSP as a game tends to get laggy with its physics, so chances are they want to set a bar with enough wiggle room as not to deter new arrivals. Despite having a strong computer that can run it, I hope these statistics improve. Chances are they will since this is EA, and I would say consoles but I concede that I don't know if consoles are still in the crosshairs for this game.

Going so far as to have the specific time(s) down huh? Guess they know how excited some people are.

If anyone remembers or has read the wiki, there was a concept for a planet 'Mez' that would be like a super-Haumea. That's an interesting possibility. If another distant planet is added my bank is on an icy super-earth or mini-neptune, perhaps as an analogue to the fabled 'Planet 9.'

Wow. I totally forgot KSP2 is coming out before too long! PleaseBeGoodPleaseBeGoodPleaseBeGoodPleaseBeGood A QR for the official KSP2 Discord was posted on Twitter. It looks like things are really ramping up. Fingers crossed...

D'aw, that's adorable! That would be a welcome addition. I do hope the 'starter' group of kerbals gets expanded. Excellent. Val's been my main. I'd miss her.

At no point did I say the game was going to be bad, and the 'whys' to your questions were already answered: Things change. That's just how projects such as game development go down. When I said 'we may not see all of these worlds make it into the game' that goes beyond just scrapping or deleting, it just as well means it comes back in another draft or form. That being said, it would be a fairly safe assumption to see most of what's been shown even in minor glimpses to make it in somewhere, but not absolute.