Jump to content

rbray89

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,719

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by rbray89

  1. rbray89
    Good performance numbers, happy with the looks, atmosphere and shadows working fully.
  2. rbray89
    I have a couple possible performance fixes in the works if I can get them working.
  3. rbray89
    Keep in mind, the old config structure will be deprecated, so the old packs won't work.
  4. rbray89
    It sounds like KSP wouldn't compose the multiple meshes (with different materials) into a single mesh. My bet is that each mesh has it's own GO (with its own meshFilter/meshRenderer/transform) and then instantiates the parent GO along with all the children. If you want one singular mesh, you are going to have to combine them yourself, and assign each mesh to a submesh within the "master" mesh (don't forget to assign the material array either).
  5. rbray89
    Actually, this makes a lot of sense. This would let KSP build the part out of all the meshes without moving or re-arranging them.
  6. rbray89
    The thing I like the most is sitting at KSP watching the cloud pass over the mountains, and the shadows rolling over the hills.
  7. rbray89
    Textures won't be scaled down beyond this value. Designed primarily to protect small icons and such
  8. rbray89
    What about the Mesh's name? MeshFilter simply contains the mesh, so I would think that the Mesh would contain the name.
  9. rbray89
    Now, you see this is very interesting, as this mod DOESN'T and CAN'T touch those textures. I'm very curious as to what is going on with your install. I bet you if you run with ONLY ATM, you wouldn't see this issue. There is another mod somewhere that has to be conflicting somehow.
  10. rbray89
    OOOH! And it has an MIT license
  11. rbray89
    Wow... I mean, wow... That is BEAUTIFUL. You have so much talent!
  12. rbray89
    ksp.log is pretty useless I'm afraid... output_log.txt is what you want, from within KSP_Data.
  13. rbray89
    Memory reporting is not correct, but it does work.
  14. rbray89
    look up how to load with OpenGL. People are reporting considerable memory savings, though with this mod, there is still some work to be done with it.
  15. rbray89
    Firstly, make sure you have set the texture resolution to full, as I think KSP defaults to Half. If it still looks awful then you can create a config (or modify an existing config) to not rescale the texture if you are using the non-basic config.
  16. rbray89
    Yes, this should work. Sorry I didn't notice it earlier.
  17. rbray89
    Correct to all, though I think that if I can implement a good saving mechanism, we'll move to DDS to save time
  18. rbray89
    Hmmm... I run Nvidia, though I also haven't tried the opengl option yet either.
  19. rbray89
    Running with the current version?
  20. rbray89
    I'm thinking that there must be a memory leak with the openGL texture mechanisms. The logs indicate that everything should be good, (resized and compressed as they should be) but they don't seem to be. I'll have to look into it more. Could be that with openGL the textures aren't being made non-readable, but I doubt it.
  21. rbray89
    This was the most annoying thing in ATM. You can check what I do to handle normal maps in the different loaders.
  22. rbray89
    the AG channels have to be moved to the RG channels, and the A+B have to be set to full (or half, can't remember wich). to be considered a "regular" normal map.
  23. rbray89
    No, the shaders require AG normal maps. The game loads MBMs directly (AG) but assumes png and tga (likely others) as RG and converts them to AG.
  24. rbray89
    This. This is why ATM has configs for this, among other things.
  25. rbray89
    Volumetric clouds will be broken for you though.
×
×
  • Create New...