Daze

Since the most of rocket in real life leave debris i don't have any problem to leave them, maybe just changing their orbit a little bit with separator SRB so they will be harmlessly

A sort of welding docking port would be great, or at least fixed strut-base to apply in SPH/VAB that can be linked together in EVA

As the title, it would be very nice if we can have a way to add flags on the side of fairings

This.

I think that with this implementation there's no need to "nerf" too much the vertical ascent from a planet with atmosphere + new aero

I totally LOVE the idea of OP, i really hope Squad will look for a similar solution.

Preparing myself for tomorrow biochemistry test

Gimbal has to be implemented in ALL SRB... Really

Yes, i got bored about 1 month ago. The solution was to install RSS + RO + Remote Tech and TAC= A new game at least till 0.1

Well said, we really need this kind of aerodynamic parts, or at least some simply airbrakes

"Bruno I and Bruno II"

I think that with KW Rocketry with the RO cfg (which actually is in Realism Overhaul download itself )

Oh. My. God. I truly think that this mod will be the heir of PorkJet Inflatable Module

Oh god, what i'm reading. Hope you are trolling

It was needed to make reference to religion?

He died during the reentry of STS-1

I quote sal_vager For me it's very very helpful, for example you cant make an ascent module using just a pod and a big SAS with monopropellant tanks inside

I totally agree, we need hinges. Imagine how beautiful would be to make a STS with a Spacelab that rotate and come partially outsider

It's not a my example, i try to build the most realistic as i can so no problem with crazy payload on top of a stick. The problem came out when there's the majority of people who plays for fun and since Squad likes that kind of fun (hey ferram) it MUST be procedural fairings, even hinges would be enough to make it fun.

And if someone want to make a ""stupid"" lander of 5mt? He can't because "hey there's restriction and it's more fun!1!"

So if i want to launch a mega candy donut of 9mt in diameter i have to use a Saturn V? :D

You have proposed a good solution indeed, it's different from "real rocket use fixed fairings!11 (maybe told by the same people who "FAR is too realistic, KSP is not simulation")

This: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/64442-Habitat-Pack

Actually i've seen more bad arguments from the people who want fixed fairing, all summarized in: "Hey p-fairings aren't realistic"-> Why the problem of "realistic" didn't came out with FAR/Stock aero discussion? "Hey it's more fun to have restriction" -> Well, it will be more fun if you have folding parts, but we don't have one. Anyway nobody is forcing you to make *crazypayloadof34mt*, you can simply make realistic payload which fit in a "realistic" fairing (as i do using p-fairings).

"Let's gonna remove 2.5 and 3.75 mt parts! You can basically explore everything in Kerbol system with only the 1.25 mt, so removing parts = more restriction = more fun!" An example on the post i'm reading...