Starwaster

You could get away with not downloading an engine pack if in fact you're going to write your own. But the engines must be patched one way or another or you're going to end up with tanks that aren't LiquidFuel/LiquidOxidizer. I don't recommend going it alone until you're familiar with RF's ModuleEngineConfigs and ModuleEnginesRF and how to write configs for them. I suggest https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/topic/194394-18x-110x-realfuels-stock-v510-stockalike-realfuels-configs-18th-august-2020/ and you can both use that to play with and learn how to write engine configs for RF.

Change the unlockTechs to a non-existent technology. Like, MechJebModuleSpaceplaneGuidance { unlockTechs = DISABLED } MechJebModuleDockingGuidance { unlockTechs = DISABLED }

Thermodynamics.

Thanks for letting me know. The IRVE3 config had its own file originally and then was consolidated with other inflatable configs. I thought that file had been deleted but obviously not. Either that or I accidentally regressed it back in.

@RogerCoyote The centrifuge part nodes are all there in the cache file so they are in the game. The TechRequired has changed to shortTermHabitation for centrifuges. (and other parts). Have you maybe not researched that yet? Have you looked for the centrifuges in a sandbox game? I think they'd probably show up there. (just to be sure that everything is configured with them) Also, ksp.log is more comprehensive for troubleshooting. The MM logs tell me is what patches were applied/not applied, and what errors MM encountered in processing patches. ksp.log tells me EVERYTHING, every error that was encountered during initializing and running the game.

That's not going to be responsible for your missing centrifuges. It's just for Free IVA. Also, note the exclamation mark in NEEDS[!StationPartsExpansionReduxIVAs] - that means not. That patch looks for StationPartsExpansionReduxIVAs to NOT be installed. It is, so it deleted that part of the patch. No action needed there. I'll take a look at these today.

I don't see sspx being touched by any of USI's mods. Although I only looked for direct references and not patches that would modify wildcard parts conditionally. Why do you say it's deleting the centrifuges? Maybe post your logs/ModuleManager.ConfigCache and I could take a look for you and see what's going on with it.

Put it up on GitHub. People who want to contribute will branch it, make changes, and then submit those changes as pull requests. You can then examine those requests and see if you want to merge them in. Or you can make specific people collaborators who can make direct edits.

It's a matter of writing program code to compute changes in position for one part in response to another part's animation. To paraphrase @darthgently, it's not an impossibility but it's also not very practical. You could also use the VAB to build your own centrifuge out of pistons, rotors, and habitable parts. Probably also impractical, but you could do it.

Not even in sandbox mode? Post logs and ModuleManager.ConfigCache for people to go over.

Extract it to the main KSP game folder. You can tell that this is the correct location because the StationPartsExpansionRedux zip has a GameData folder in it. If it had not had a GameData folder then you would have extracted the contents to the GameData folder that already exists in the KSP game folder. A few mods might have more complex installation, such as if they have craft files.

It should be, but it would take some work to write a patch that brings it in line with SMURFF's mass values. Looking at what the author has said on the subject, it seems like their position is that Real Fuels should be used instead.

It doesn't matter who it's aimed at, the only ones here to catch the brunt of it is the moderators. If you're taking it personally, how do you think they feel? They can only take so much negativity before THEY start taking it personally. So please ease off. All we have left is volunteers.

They all hang out in the Realism Overhaul Discord and I don't go there anymore. And I'm not sure any of them really pay attention to the RF topic anymore. Could try pinging @NathanKell @siimav @blowfish and see who maybe turns up.

It would be a good idea if you created an issue on the Github repository about that. For increased visibility.