Dfthu

16(+1)

Back this summer at the Minnesota Air National Guard Museum

16(+1)

Well yea it would be fine. We all know you’re doing it for valid reason.

I already got that though, the orange they have is not the same as the tank.

Not parts per say but the engine shrouds and decouples . I have a 2.5m orange tank rocket, and it looks weird with the white shrouds and decouplers., I don't know exactly how they would go on doing that but would be ince. I would also like if the fairings had a few more texture switches.

I usually play one game exclusively for like 2 weeks before I get tired of it and play another one, which continues the cycle. But I’ll play Cities Skylines, Minecraft, FSX, ETS2, TF2, And a few other games that I play a little less often. But when my last PC died about 2 months ago, I got a cheaper $200 one. Some now Cities Skylines is basically unplayable and rest of them get about 10 less FPS. But with my first gaming PC I’m getting soon, I’ll probably get some more modern AAA games.

Good looking plane! Don't worry about those flaps either, those are not air brakes. I'll add you now!

God no. It would never happen. That thing can barley fly straight and level.

I'm running a crappy old HP Compaq Elite 8300 Ultra Slim desktop and it can play some games on the lowest settings and some are basically un playable. After looking around I found this https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16883102537 I assuming this will good for playing KSP or Cities Skylines with nearly max settings. Basically regular gaming (But not the new games) Do you guys think this would be a good buy? Also would it be ok if I used a External hard drive to transfer my files over to the new one?

Whoops posted on wrong post.

A lot of computers can run that. I personally have a crappy $200 HP Compaq Elite 8300 Ultra Slim Desktop. Although I am thinking about getting a new computer. But on fairly low settings I get around 25-30 FPS with about 200 parts or less. I run tons of mods and I think it works. But not perfectly.

First of all @NightshineRecorralis, That first plane looks awesome. Really reminds me of a DHC-7. Also a impressive small SSTO you got! I'll add both of your scores now.

That jet engine effect is the Stock Real Plume https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/130576-14-realplume-stock-v120-30318-the-farewell-update/

Very good! I just had to give extra points for making it a SSTO. So it looks like you get 780 points!

Great job! Don't worry about the Wing connectors. I just made that rule so person doesn't add a insane amount of wings.

Instead of all of the VTOL landings on the VAB, lets try something a bit harder. Landing a plane conventionally on the VAB. Here is how points will be calculated, (Mass of craft in tons x 20) - ((Number of engines plus landing gear) x 5) Higher means better. Also mass should rounded down if its 0-.5 tons and up if .5-1 tons. Bonus points for No reverse thrust / Air Brakes, Only brakes: +50 points If you can take off again: +25 points (Included screenshot of take off) If your craft can carry more than 500 kerbals: +75 points If your craft is a SSTO +50 points Rules No parachutes, Rockets to slow you down. You can only use brakes, reverse thrust, and Air Brakes No VTOL of any kind Can't lose any parts No wing spamming No Alt-F12 or any sort of cheating Engines must face forwards Mods are ok but they somehow give you a unfair advantage then you can't use them Indestructible buildings can be used for heavy planes but don't use them to stop. For example slamming your plane into a wall to stop Submissions, Videos are preferred but if you use screenshots please include, Picture of your craft in the hanger with weight, Picture of final approach, Picture of you plane landed on the top of VAB, and a picture of the F-3 menu. Leaderboard @AeroGav - 780 points @NightshineRecorralis - 430 points (SSTO) @hoioh - 330 points @Kuznetsov Space program - 275 points @NightshineRecorralis - 195 points (RJ) @Dfthu - 110 points Any lastly my attempt.

Works for me. I would try and reinstall it

It actually flies pretty well, although it rolls way too much. Can fly without SAS but needs to constant fiddling to keep it straight. Flies perfectly fine with SAS on.

Considering he hasn't visited in about 3 months, I would say it's dead.

Don't think this has been posted yet. NASA is thinking about branding rockets and letting astronauts do commercials. Here is a article https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/11/17798460/nasa-trump-advertisers-sponsors-product-placement-mission-revenue

Best bet would be to make a Discord server.

I think it would look better if you added some windows on the adapter. But looks great!

Sandbox Mk 1 (Have a few Sandbox saves) and Career

Runways only go from 01 to 36. Although not every runway is at a exact 10 degree angle, a runway at 122 degrees heading would be RWY 12.