data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c581/1c58198490e263bd696eb175cd631c83d5132c95" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a190e/a190e8aea5bb0c4f9e043819acb48180b812b021" alt=""
Darnok
Members-
Posts
1,266 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by Darnok
-
What happens to physics when time stops?
Darnok replied to RainDreamer's topic in Science & Spaceflight
First define time Second define how you measure time. Then we can talk about scenario when time has stopped.- 19 replies
-
- sci-fi
- time travel
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Maybe we should be able to mark locations in map mode, just click on location you want to mark and label it + correct/edit latitude and longitude for this mark.
-
"Luminiferous Aether" had some assumptions and only those assumptions were wrong, not entire idea about aether filling space. Higgs and many others just took Tesla's ideas and rewrote them, in weird way, to get rewards and reputation.
-
Breakthrough Starshot Initiative *Live Feed HAS ENDED*
Darnok replied to rodion_herrera's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Haha right because everyone needed approval to start working on nukes I like idea of asteroid defence system, this can be better usage for such strong lasers than Hawking idea. It is literally best place to put military base, since it can't be observed directly from Earth, so if you are first you can target and destroy rival rockets, probes or spy satellites before they even find your base. And they can't even announce that you destroyed their property in TV, since its military secret --- As for main topic... we shouldn't send anything outside of solar system, because we don't know what rules and laws can have alien civilizations, maybe they obey basic laws of nature and act like predators, where stronger and more advanced are higher in "food chain". -
Breakthrough Starshot Initiative *Live Feed HAS ENDED*
Darnok replied to rodion_herrera's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Building Moon base would cost more than US nuclear missile launch facilities? If lasers can make huge damage on our infrastructure then I am sure that laser-bases would replace nukes for next ~50 years. -
Breakthrough Starshot Initiative *Live Feed HAS ENDED*
Darnok replied to rodion_herrera's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Ok, but you can still build large mirror on Moon orbit and target Earth from dark side My point was what is possible to damage or destroy using such strong laser. If everything I mentioned is possible, then nobody is going to stop US, Russia and China from building its own military bases on Moon and target rivals. Just like they do right now with nukes. -
Breakthrough Starshot Initiative *Live Feed HAS ENDED*
Darnok replied to rodion_herrera's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Prevent what? -
Breakthrough Starshot Initiative *Live Feed HAS ENDED*
Darnok replied to rodion_herrera's topic in Science & Spaceflight
So if we would build Moon base with huge laser and target someone on Earth we could kill her/him? Would it be possible to destroy or damage car (Tesla), planes, rockets, missiles and satellites from Earth or Moon orbit, with such strong laser and so precise targeting system? EDIT: disabling power grid for cities from orbit would be possible? -
Not only for smaller buildings you can use different materials than concrete and steel.
-
You are looking at this from wrong perspective. Why would you want to spend your live in 30-40 floor piece of concrete? You can't even decide there what can be color of your front doors or windows. You have to agree for what majority agrees and live like others wants you to live. Vertical buildings for living are nonsense, but they are useful for offices, services and shops. Imagine city with only few tall buildings where you can buy everything you need. Costs of transportation of goods to those buildings would be lower, because you deliver goods to few locations, even if those goods are from other side of the country. Trucks, taking large part of road traffic, wouldn't be even needed, because you could build train station near this tall building. Main reason for us to travel is that we want to buy something... you have to go and buy things, because your goods are single use products that are breaking really fast. Each new product needs box, so there is reason to transport resources for boxes... then you have to drop box and transport garbage etc etc. Direction where our industry has developed is main reason for huge resources and energy usage (waste) and reason for huge traffic. Changing american-style-of-live (100% consumptionism) into more reasonable way of live would cause less traffic, less resource and energy usage. Cars aren't issue, its the reason you have to use car to buy milk or tea is problem. Common goods should be sold in local shops, so you wouldn't have to walk more that 20 minutes to buy something for dinner. Then only guy who would use car to transport goods would be shop owner. While more advanced goods (electronics, furnitures etc etc) can be delivered from tall-vertical building. Why we are not going in this way? Because your time (your travel time) doesn't cost anything, while employees time costs, so corporation prefer to waste your time instead of their moneys. And allowing for local business to take over some branches (like food distribution) is something that corporations (large markets) won't allow any time soon.
-
Guys it is not about transportation, it is about your time. Cities should be build to save time of its citizens, otherwise it makes no sense at all. Today using car you can travel 50km in shorter time that travel 10km inside large city, that is why large cities are total nonsense.
-
Then maybe American low middle class person consumption rate is too high? We still have oceans, seas and hydroponics, so we have 4xEarth lands.
-
This film predicts that next reason for racism can be modified DNA. People with artificial, better, DNA will think that they are better since day they were born, while people made by natural evolution will be second category humans, with lower talents and skills. This is exactly what created very harmful ideologies in past. Sadly we are going into that direction... people, celebrities after plastic surgeries are considered as prettier, more talented and better. Everything that is artificial is considered as better today... this is not going to end well.
-
Alternitive to the Outer Space Treaty
Darnok replied to Spaceception's topic in Science & Spaceflight
That is why this treaty is pure nonsense... it is for people that have no idea how world works. It is like saying that no country can claim land in North and South America after they were discovered -
Alternitive to the Outer Space Treaty
Darnok replied to Spaceception's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Same thing that was since we learned to draw animals on caves walls... if you have army large enough to defend this territory it is yours. -
Parts inside storage bay or cargo bay should have better crash tolerance under water... or even water shouldn't be able to break them at all. I have tested remote tech (before 1.1) and if we are going to have similar stock functions then default range for probe cores should be more than 3 km... near 70-100km seems fine for me. More capsules with many additional functions like in this mod This is really great idea to have empty tanks in capsules, so we can save few parts. I would add some capsules tweak for small solar panes, RCS thrusters, additional life support (for future use ), landing legs and lights. Few more wheels and landing legs would be good addition... like SpaceX legs used on Falcon 9, and tracks wheels for heavy vehicles (using plane landing gears for this is really ugly). Landing legs could have tweaks, like cargo bays doors, for how much we want them to eject them. More adapters... this is pain in stock. Stock ramp, 2.5 tail section is great, but for smaller crafts would be great to have small ramps for ground vehicles.
- 1 reply
-
- water
- remote tech
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Or few flat and not only flat adapters?
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink Something we can hear a lot these days... environment and laws made by us does affect our way of thinking. Building even larger cities for more dense population is wrong direction.
-
What is more important than health of citizens? We want to fight with fossil fuels because environment health is most important yet we ignore things that are harmful to our own health... this is wrong. What? running near large road and breathing chemicals and concrete dust while you are exhausted is healthier than what?
-
What? So its time to build new cities in other ways. Anyone that thinks you can grow healthy food in huge city is wrong. If you think you can be healthier by running in the morning few kilometers in large city you are very wrong. Making huge zero wild life zone you are harming environment much more that if you would make less dense lower zone where everyone can have their house and small garden.
-
Chickens are also fine with it I am pretty sure that vertical are worse, for your health and environment, because you have layers of concrete. While in lower and less dense buildings style you have more green and more space.
-
But this is nonsense, we could build like that in times when our main transport vehicle was horse, but today we have small, easy to use and fast vehicles that can transport us on large distances very fast... but we are making towns vertical and put speed limits on cars instead of go other way and build larger horizontally towns with good access for parking spots and roads.
-
KSP Barge and Falcon 9 crafts incomming in 3... 2...
-
Some descriptions and data http://www.pmview.com/spaceodysseytwo/spacelvs/sld002.htm http://www.pmview.com/spaceodysseytwo/spacelvs/sld052.htm http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/reurrier.htm
-
NASA was thinking about something like this, but with wings...