

andqui
Members-
Posts
94 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by andqui
-
KSP Interstellar Extended Continued Development Thread
andqui replied to FreeThinker's topic in KSP1 Mod Development
Sorry, could I quickly bump this? CKAN doesn't think the two play nice together, whereas the first post says they do. Is it ok to do a manual install of the two, or will that cause problems? thanks -
KSP Interstellar Extended Continued Development Thread
andqui replied to FreeThinker's topic in KSP1 Mod Development
The first post mentions that there is RealFuels integration- but CKAN doesn't allow you to install both this and RealFuels, as the "Interstellar Fuel Switch" dependency conflicts with RealFuels. How should I get around this? -
[1.12.*] Deadly Reentry v7.9.0 The Barbie Edition, Aug 5th, 2021
andqui replied to Starwaster's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
I'm having an issue with DRE + FAR. Here is my return vessel: Just a Mk1 command pod, with a universal storage core and bays right below it, with a stock 1.25m heat shield below that. During re-entry, the command pod seems to take the brunt of the heating, and not the heat shield; the ablator disappears very quickly. Initially, I had put the ablator resource to 0 for the pod to save weight, as I head the shield underneath it, but I needed to alter the save file to add it back to be able to re-enter safely, otherwise the command pod (not the rest of the ship) would overheat and explode. The Universal storage bays and the batteries/parts within them don't seem to be heating abnormally, it's just the Mk1 command pod. Does this sound like a bug, or am I misunderstanding how the shielding works?- 5,919 replies
-
- reentry
- omgitsonfire
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I'm getting a CTD when I go to launch a vessel, and can't figure out from the error logs what's causing it. I don't think it's out of memory, I don't have any visual overhauls or large part packs installed. ModList: Deadly Reentry 7.0.2 DMagic Orbital Science 1.0.3 FAR 0.15.1 KAS 0.5.1 KIS 1.1.4 Module Manager 2.6.3 Protractor Continued 2.5.1 RemoteTech 1.6.4 Science Alert 1.8.7 StageRecovery 1.5.5 TAC Life Support 11.1.2 TextureReplacer 2.4.3 Ambient Light 1.4.3.1 Chatterer 0.9.1 RPM 0.19.3 Docking Port Alignment 6.2 Final Frontier 0.82 Kerbal Engineer 1.0.16.6 Persistent Rotation 0.5.2 ScanSat 12.0 VesselView for RPM Atmospheric Sound Enhancement 2.2 Collision FX 3.2 Dangit 0.6.1 Community Resource Pack 0.4.2 Distant Object Enhancement 1.5.5 Infernal Robotic 0.21.2 SelectRoot2 Ship Manifest 4.2.1.1 Universal Storage 1.1.0.3 ActionGroupsExtended 132a Better Buoyancy v1.2 Kerbal Alarm Clock 3.3.1.1 Kerbal Construction Time 1.1.6 Kerbal Joint Reinforcement 3.1.3 PreciseNode 1.1.3 Procedural Fairings 3.14 RealChute 1.3.2.3 Toolbar 1.7.9 Transfer Window Planner 1.3.0.1 USI Exploration 4.1 USI Freight Transport 0.4.1 USI MKS 0.30.2 AVC 1.1.5.0 KSP Interstellar Extended 1.1.4 Procedural Parts 1.1.1 Stock Bugfix Modules 1.0.2d.2 TweakScale 2.1 Vens Stock Revamp 1.8.1 Waypoint Manager 2.3.2 Contract Configurator 1.0.4 Community Tech Tree 2.1 SETI Contracts SETI Tree 0.8.4 B9 Procedural Wings MechJeb CrossFeedEnabler v3.3 Contract Science Modifier 0.4 ContractPack RemoteTech 1.1.3 ContractPack SCANSat 0.5.0 ContractPack Tourism 1.1.3 ContractPact Anomaly Surveyor 1.1.2 SETI Greenhouse 0.9.1 Error logs are here. thanks
-
[0.90] ADIOS Tech Tree - V.15 - 12-03-2015
andqui replied to Arachnidek's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
I just tried that. I got the latest aggresive ATM from here, and am using no other parts or textures outside of "highly recommended" list and I get 3.2 gb at startup, OOM crash after a few missions. Are you using half-size texture quality in the settings or something like that? -
[0.90] ADIOS Tech Tree - V.15 - 12-03-2015
andqui replied to Arachnidek's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
I'm finding that I can't run all of the "highly recommended" mods without running out of memory, even with the aggressive active texture manager. Any suggestions on which of the part packs would be best to leave out? -
The "leak" is actually volatile fuels boiling off. So any mode of propulusion that relies on fuels that need to be cooled (liquid oxygen, liquid hydrogen) is a bad idea for any long-duration mission. Insulated tanks will help a bit, and will reduce the boil-off to an extent, but unless you're going to be using the fuel within a few days of launch, use non-volatile hypergolic fuels instead. They're less efficient, but don't boil/leak away.
-
On second thought, maybe it's a good idea if volatiles don't replenish without a launch tower. Several RL rockets (mainly military and ex-military) use less efficient but involatile hypergolic fuels so that you don't need to constantly pump chilled fuels into them before launch, such as the Russian Proton rocket. Leaving it as is gives a good reason to use these hypergolic fuels in launch stages until the player unlocks the launch towers.
-
Sorry if this has been brought up before, I tried a quick search and couldn't find anything. I'm having an issue with using this mod together with real fuels- during the time after I hit "launch" to the time it takes for the vessel to build, I get boil-off of things like liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen, because real-fuels thinks the vessel has been sitting on the launchpad during the entire construction time. Is there any way to get KCT to restore resource amounts to VAB settings when pulling the vessel out of VAB storage? thanks
-
[WIP][.90][0.43]KSAEA Tech Tree and Game Rebalance
andqui replied to Pirsig's topic in KSP1 Mod Development
Sure, that makes sense, I had my space flight blinkers on, atmospheric flight makes sense to preceed any type of space flight. That would probably involve moving wings, bodies, landing gear, and such earlier in the tech tree. Sure, it doesn't have to be at the start. The most important thing is that SAS remains a niche technology, useful for certain applications such as station keeping and holding attitude, but not very useful for frequent maneuvering. -
[WIP][.90][0.43]KSAEA Tech Tree and Game Rebalance
andqui replied to Pirsig's topic in KSP1 Mod Development
This looks very interesting- I would be really excited if somebody made a tree rebalance/rearrangement to make it a bit more realistic/challenging/logical that supports mods (unlike Better than Starting Manned, which is otherwise great). If you don't mind, here is me brainstorming about what the ideal kerbal-scale tech tree would look like, in what I see would be doable without slipping into maintainable insantity (which is what seems to happen with rebalancing packs that incorporate lots of different always-changing mods). 1. Probes should come before manned flight. This this this this this. As it stands now, there's no glorious moment of triumph in the early game when you finally manage to get your tiny, pathetic, little beeping box of a satellite that will run out out of power 30 minutes into orbit. Instead, it's just a mark one command pod, couple of fuel tanks and an engine, and you can get manned orbit on your 2nd-3rd mission no problem. 2. Make SAS less powerful and move RCS to first stage of tech tree. SAS and torque wheels have some big limitations IRL, and RCS doesn't get used nearly enough early in the tech tree (partly because you can't get them early on in the first place) 3. Solar panels less overpowered, inverse square law, which I see you are already doing. 4. Smaller engines should unlock before the bigger engines. As it is with the default tree, you get the big LV-engines, and it's only when you get to the miniaturization node that you get engines that don't massively overpower the orbital stage of a one-pod space craft. Unlike building transistors and processors, miniaturization is not the difficult part about building rocket engines, so they really shouldn't be a few tiers down in the tree. 5. Remote-tech integration, with a few configs that put antenna stations scattered around Kerbin so you can launch those early satellites before you manage to get your heavy manned missions in orbit. Those are the big-5, that start to bother me when playing career mode with the stock tree. There are probably other bits of illogical silliness that could be fixed (aircraft coming after rockets, no launch clamps at the beginning, etc), but I would think it important to keep things sane at first. -
[0.90]Asmi's ECLSS Mod - REVIVED! (Version 1.0.19)
andqui replied to Shasol's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
You can't just vent it? -
[WIP][TechTree @ 0.23.5] - [MS19e] - Realistic Progression LITE
andqui replied to MedievalNerd's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
I just got through setting up a RSS KSP build from the beginning. I'm using procedural parts and real fuels. The procedural fuel tanks and service modules appear in the career research screen, in the "Tech Level 0 Engines" section, but don't appear in the VAB screen. In the VAB propulsion parts list, I have "Procedural Real Fuels SRB," "Procedural Kethane," both of which are there available without unlocking anything in the "Start" node. However, none of the 5 procedural fuel tanks in the "Tech Level 0 Engines" section appear in the VAB list. The other parts and engines in there do appear correctly. In sandbox mode, the "Procedural Real Fuels tank" is available (which is not present in this Tech Level 0 Engines" section. What should I do to fix this? thanks -
I'm having a minor problem, where I'm unable to close Ship Manifest after opening it with the toolbar. Clicking the toolbar icon first opens the crew manifest successfully, and all the transfers and management work great. However, when I'm done, clicking the toolbar icon again does not close the crew manifest window, and there aren't any close buttons on the GUI itself. To fix it, I have to exit to the tracking center and reload the flight. All other mods using toolbar open/close succesfully, and toolbar is updated to it's latest version. thanks
-
[0.23.5] Realism Overhaul: ROv5.2 + Modlist for RSS 6/30/14
andqui replied to NathanKell's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
thanks- I now have this installed: GameData/Klockheed_Martian/Plugins/km_Gimbal_2.0.dll, and when I right click the engines I have no options to tweak gimbal settings at all. Just lock gimbal entirely and change tech level. -
[0.23.5] Realism Overhaul: ROv5.2 + Modlist for RSS 6/30/14
andqui replied to NathanKell's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Yes. I only have one copy of EE: GameData/ExsurgentEngineering/ExsurgentEngineering.dll, and it is the newest one dated May 9. One central engine, and it tries to roll and makes the rocket tip over. Yes, one engine in center. How do I disable roll on the engine? I don't have tweakable gimbals installed- I did try installing it, but I couldn't find anywhere to turn off the roll gimbal. -
[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18
andqui replied to ferram4's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Hope you don't mind me asking about something not part of your mod, but would you know how to do that? I'm not using tweakable gimbals or Space Shuttle Engines- just whatever comes with RO/Engine Igniter/Real Fuels/RFTS/Exurgent Engineering. The engines have an attribute that says "smarter gimbal", with values for pitch and yaw range, but I can't adjust them or turn off roll by right clicking the engine or by going into action groups- the only thing I can do is lock the gimbal entirely as a tweakable.- 14,073 replies
-
- aerodynamics
- ferram aerospace research
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18
andqui replied to ferram4's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
OK, I took off the fins entirely leaving only an engine, which shouldn't provide any roll authority. When I hit the q/e keys to roll with that setup, and no fins at all, the rocket does the same thing and begins to pitch, so it's an issue with the gimbals, not with FAR, my apologies.- 14,073 replies
-
- aerodynamics
- ferram aerospace research
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
[0.23.5] Realism Overhaul: ROv5.2 + Modlist for RSS 6/30/14
andqui replied to NathanKell's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
I'm having an issue with engine gimbals. Whenever I put in a roll command (Q or E), the rocket begins to yaw or pitch over, even with just the engine and no fins or roll devices installed. I have real fuels installed, with RTFS, Realism overhaul, and the newest exurgent engineering dll. Is this an identifiable problem? Is there anything I forgot to install? thanks -
[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18
andqui replied to ferram4's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
I'm having a problem with using fins for roll control. When I put four fins on the bottom of my rocket, and then apply a roll command (Q or E,) the rocket begins to pitch or yaw as it rolls, as if there were some imbalance. I'm posting this here because this seems the most relevant mod out of all those I have installed- I'm also using RSS/RO. thanks- 14,073 replies
-
- aerodynamics
- ferram aerospace research
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
[WIP][TechTree @ 0.23.5] - [MS19e] - Realistic Progression LITE
andqui replied to MedievalNerd's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
It was the first WAC corporal experiments, both atmospheric and radiation. I might have been at the edge of comm range, I'll try again when I get home