Jump to content

[Min KSP: 1.12.2] Deep Space Exploration Vessels - Build NASA Inspired Ships In KSP


Angelo Kerman

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, smotheredrun said:

Not urgent, but are you planning on revisiting the engines at some point? They seem a bit overpowered at the moment, especially the Supernova.

Funny you should ask. The engine was originally designed 2 years ago before KSP had things like part upgrades. Originally you had to spend science and RocketParts to upgrade the engine until KSP 1.2 came along. Now you simply use the stock part upgrade system. Anyway, last couple of days, I have been looking at the engine in terms of a balance pass. My goal is to have just enough delta-v to send the Kerbal Discovery II reference design to Jool. Just like in the NASA paper Realizing 2001: A Space Odyssey, you'd have to send the Discovery's fuel tanks down to a moon where a mining station refuels them. Once I have the remaining parts designed, I plan to re-tune the engine's hydrogen mode to provide the 8-10k delta-v needed to reach Jool and a few of its moons. The more advanced pulsed plasma mode will become somewhat of a prototype "Epstein Drive" that can push the reference design to about 16-20k delta-v. Given that there are other mods with even more powerful fusion engines, I'm comfortable with this approach.

To safeguard current craft, only new craft will be affected by the revised engine.

Additionally, I'm updating the Compact ISRU, bringing it up to date with KSP 1.2 and adjusting the production formula for making FusionPellets. You're going to need a lot more Ore and slightly less Water per second than the current configuration, and the output of FusionPellets per second will significantly drop as well. I considered going more realistic in terms of requiring LqdDeuterium and LqdHe3 to produce FusionPellets (the NASA design uses deuterium and helium-3), but ultimately I decided that 1) FusionPellets should remain abstracted like the stock LiquidFuel and Oxidizer are, and 2) I didn't want to introduce long fuel production chains in a mod that was centered around deep space exploration vessels, not the infrastructure needed to support them. With these changes, FusionPellets are going to cost a lot more as well.

Edited by Angel-125
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, smotheredrun said:

That's good. I was looking at using this mod as a platform for a Jool 5 challenge attempt, but currently DSEV is "not approved"...... since October I believe. I can edit this post and paste a link to the specific post in the Jool 5 thread when I get back to my computer later today.

My guess is that even with the changes, DSEV's engines would remain not approved, but you could still use the structural and habitat components along with conventional stock engines like the Rhino.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally slogged through the artwork for the cryopod. 12 of these go into the CryoShelter part I'm working on, a combined cyrogenic hibernation module and storm shelter.

89lmQBO.png

Now the hard part: getting this thing hooked up so that DeepFreeze can use it. Thankfully @JPLRepo provided me with some great directions on how to do that. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Angel-125 said:

Finally slogged through the artwork for the cryopod. 12 of these go into the CryoShelter part I'm working on, a combined cyrogenic hibernation module and storm shelter.

Now the hard part: getting this thing hooked up so that DeepFreeze can use it. Thankfully @JPLRepo provided me with some great directions on how to do that. :)

[Edited by adsii1970 - removed images]

Wow, that's pretty awesome. I cannot wait to use this asset. This looks really, really great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Angel-125 said:

Thanks! :) Here is how it'll look when animated:

<snip>

Are you going to configure it to have JSI Advanced Transparent Pods (windows)?
Edit: Oh sorry never mind. These are inside a part. so yeah. You just need to hook up the DeepFreezer PartModule.

Instructions not included... (OR rather have been).. but Warranty not included. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, rasta013 said:

Angel those look beautiful man!  Can't wait to boil off my kerbals! :P 

Thanks! :) I can't wait to have the latest release done. Speaking of which, I finished the D2 Cryo Shelter exterior tonight. You can see that it's a bit more armored than the other modules.

Tt2yFVI.png

And a simple re-scale let me make the new D2 Truss Segments. The Hex Truss system remains 2.5m, but I added 3 new truss segments at 3.75m diameter. The DR-375 will also get a hex option to complement the new trusses.

Finally, my Discovery II reference design is coming along nicely:

Bm3qZCV.png

The window textures are placeholders. The lander on the nose can reach all four moons as long as it refuels at Laythe and Tylo. For engine balancing purposes I don't have the flyable fuel tanks attached- In the NASA paper, the fuel tanks detach from the ship and fly down to a refinery to get refueled. For KSP, you'll have flying tanks as part of the sample craft files, but you'll still need to send a tanker to the Discovery to refuel the central truss tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First test of the Cryo Shelter's IVA:

RdoRAjd.png

I'm happy to say that I'm getting much better at aligning the transforms needed to properly seat kerbals. Seat transform alignment is one of the most time consuming activities in IVA development for me, short of creating the IVA artwork itself. Fortunately, my latest iteration of that process has made the process a snap. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@JPLRepo@adsii1970 First successful freeze and thaw test of the Cryo Shelter!

Here you can see the test chamber's animation worked successfully:

pBpZE5Y.png

About to thaw out the test subject:

VhArrhk.png

DeepFreeze is performing as expected:

xHucM9W.png

Successful thaw!

PaE6HK6.png

This tells me that all the animations are set up properly, as well as the seat transforms. Now it's just a matter of adding the remaining freeze/thaw cameras, adding some props, setting up the overlay mesh, and removing polygons that you can't see! Thanks again for the help, JPLRepo! :)

About the only thing I think isn't working right is the window transparency: Is there a particular shader I need to use?

Edited by Angel-125
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to go on record right freaking now in saying THANK YOU for the MK3 form factor included in these pieces!  I have so many ways of addressing 2.5,/3.75 but I have practically nothing unless I want to run the MK3 expansion mod to add on that form factor cleanly to DSVs.  These little bits and bobs your including to mate with that will make building even more fun... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, rasta013 said:

I just want to go on record right freaking now in saying THANK YOU for the MK3 form factor included in these pieces!  I have so many ways of addressing 2.5,/3.75 but I have practically nothing unless I want to run the MK3 expansion mod to add on that form factor cleanly to DSVs.  These little bits and bobs your including to mate with that will make building even more fun... 

No problem. :) I've wanted a clean interface between 3.75m and Mk3 for a long time, and since I didn't find any, I made one. Ditto for the probe core.

9 hours ago, Freshmeat said:

So, 3.75m reaction wheels? I think I will delay constructing my deep space tug a bit. The large hex trusses look really nice as well, and I would like to include them just for the look of it.

Reaction wheels and probe core. :) 60 units of torque on the reaction wheels, though I might bump that up a bit and throttle back the control limiter default so you don't overpower your rockets. Plus you get the MK3 body style option.

Speaking of Mk3, I wonder if you can make this with MK3 parts...

Spoiler

X-33_Venture_Star_in_Orbit.jpg

That might make a nice launcher for DSEV...

Edited by Angel-125
Link to comment
Share on other sites

know I could make that with B9 but I don't think any of the stock Mk3 parts are large/wide enough to provide the thick lifting bady.  You could maybe get close to the top down shape though...especially if you were to throw on B9 Procedural Wings...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...