[ASC-III] Air Superiority Challenge - King of the Hill (BDArmory 4v4 AI Duels: WW1 Theme) - Now Concluded!

[Draconiator]

I think I'm going to rebuild my ASC III entry...I went "Dawn of Aviation"-like without thinking about it, lol

 

And thus, I give you the Kerbwith Super Llama:

Edited May 28, 2016 by Draconiator

[NotAnAimbot]

7 hours ago, Draconiator said:

Here come the last few battles of ASC II!!

Quite funny. The F-2X has missing ailerons on one side due to me forgetting symmetry toggle, but still manages to kick ass.

[Dman979]

@DoctorDavinci-

But isn't choosing a appropriate weapons system an integral part of plane design?

The way I see it, we can challenge 2 things- designer's ability to build a craft for a specific weapons system, or the ability to use all the parts of systems engineering to create a good design.

As much a it as painful to fight against, I think that the Vulture/VulcaRaptors are a good example of the second. I've never been in favor of more constraints, because I think that too many can lead to cookie-cutter planes.

@inigma- for what it's worth, my vote is for the AA guns.

 

[Draconiator]

Hmmmmm yep I think these are ready.  they justr needed a minor change; I relocated the guns from the cowl to the wings...these're ready.

 

 

[jrodriguez]

Is there any ASC-III planes ready? I'd like to do some tests

[Bananders]

On 25/5/2016 at 1:20 AM, inigma said:

I want this to be WWI style dogfighting. I'm thinking 50 parts is also a bit much (I can make a good fighter under 30) but in a pinch it does ok.

yeah, you can with ease make a 30-parts plane, but i fear that we're all going to have similar planes. i like the idea of 50 parts, it's not like it's going to hurt anybody.

[CoywolfGaming]

I am just wondering, but does anyone know if the HARM missiles are allowed?

[jrodriguez]

3 minutes ago, CoywolfGaming said:

I am just wondering, but does anyone know if the HARM missiles are allowed?

For ASC-3? No way. It is going to be WWI style.

[CoywolfGaming]

Sorry i must have been reading the wrong section. I was thinking about the first section, so when it comes around again i can sumit my fighter.

Edited May 28, 2016 by CoywolfGaming
Clarification

[gag09]

Introducing the Korsair its the lovechild of a B-24 a F4U corsair and a Fokker DR1.

[GDJ]

45 minutes ago, gag09 said:

Introducing the Korsair its the lovechild of a B-24 a F4U corsair and a Fokker DR1.

LOVE IT!!

8 hours ago, jrodriguez said:

Is there any ASC-III planes ready? I'd like to do some tests

Well, if you have the latest Firespitter installed, I have a Red Baron Fokker DR1 ready to rock. It's fairly period accurate in terms of speed and maneuverability.

[Draconiator]

hmmm, turns out mine isn't ready after all, found a flaw in the taildragging aspect, and had to put a small wheel on. it's okay now though thank goodness.

[JollyGreenGI]

So uh... no one has uploaded any of their designs for ASC-III yet. I had to get a bit, creative, in testing.

 

[g00bd0g]

31 minutes ago, JollyGreenGI said:

So uh... no one has uploaded any of their designs for ASC-III yet. I had to get a bit, creative, in testing.

That thing is AWESOME. I was gonna do a triplane also, but now I may have to do a quadplane, or even hexplane

[JollyGreenGI]

18 minutes ago, g00bd0g said:

That thing is AWESOME. I was gonna do a triplane also, but now I may have to do a quadplane, or even hexplane

Hahaha, wing stacking truly is the way to go  

[gag09]

I can't wait. @JollyGreenGI

Edited May 28, 2016 by gag09

[JollyGreenGI]

3 minutes ago, gag09 said:

I can't wait. @JollyGreenGI

VulcaRaptor: The early days.

[inigma]

21 hours ago, Dman979 said:

@DoctorDavinci-

But isn't choosing a appropriate weapons system an integral part of plane design?

The way I see it, we can challenge 2 things- designer's ability to build a craft for a specific weapons system, or the ability to use all the parts of systems engineering to create a good design.

As much a it as painful to fight against, I think that the Vulture/VulcaRaptors are a good example of the second. I've never been in favor of more constraints, because I think that too many can lead to cookie-cutter planes.

@inigma- for what it's worth, my vote is for the AA guns.

 

So if we include Aviator Arsenal to the mod list, would you recommend any restrictions on weapons?

[inigma]

Sad news.  Looks like BDArmory might no longer be in development.

 

[The Optimist]

I'll enter my ultramaneuverable vernor-powered 90%-reaction-wheel wingless rocket jet

[JollyGreenGI]

1 minute ago, The Optimist said:

I'll enter my ultramaneuverable vernor-powered 90%-reaction-wheel wingless rocket jet

Current competition is closed, the next one is WWI-era planes.

[gag09]

Well someone might pick it up and continue development.

[The Optimist]

5 minutes ago, JollyGreenGI said:

Current competition is closed, the next one is WWI-era planes.

KAX and aviator arsenal?

[JollyGreenGI]

Just now, The Optimist said:

KAX and aviator arsenal?

Nothing's official yet, but that's likely. Currently it's KAX and BDArmory's .50 cal Brownings.

[NotAnAimbot]

2 hours ago, inigma said:

So if we include Aviator Arsenal to the mod list, would you recommend any restrictions on weapons?

Loadout can be of any type, as long as you can find an example of a plane fitting it in the 1903 (Kitty Hawk) to 1918 (German capitulation) period, having similar engine power and weight as yours.