monophonic Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 2:28 AM, cubinator said: Based on analysis of the above photo and data from @Just Jim I believe the Zuma spacecraft was launched with an inclination of about 40 degrees. The second stage may have fired again at some point, so it may be in a different, higher orbit by now. However, since Stage 1 performed a RTLS rather than landing on the barge, Zuma probably isn't incredibly far from where I projected it to be. Unless the spacecraft itself did a major burn, which can't be ruled out entirely. Expand There was some talk about the first launch window possibly aiming really close to the orbit of a previously launched government satellite. Any idea if there were such "coincidences" this time around yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarStreak2109 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/7/2018 at 3:25 PM, Starman4308 said: Technical point of order: that's 3 RS-68 engines, not 3 RS-25s. An RS-25 is an SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine), AKA "so expensive nobody but Congress would envision using them on an expendable lift vehicle". [Snip] Expand My bad, mixed those up, meant of course the RS68... On 1/7/2018 at 6:03 PM, KSK said: Also, my understanding from other, wiser heads on this thread is that the FH payloads are already volume limited rather than mass-limited. [Snip] Expand That's what I was wondering as well... Maybe FH is opening up more opportunities for interplanetary missions (more dV)??!?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSEP Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB666 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 12:06 PM, NSEP said: Expand The video has alot of ifs and maybe's in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 SN is funded for COTS. I fully expect it to fly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubinator Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Looks like SES-16 and Paz are both slated for January 30. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 It'll be exciting to see which day the TEL with FH rolls out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 12:27 PM, PB666 said: The video has alot of ifs and maybe's in it. Expand And ~20 occurences of "space-axe" per first two minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 2:00 PM, kerbiloid said: And ~20 occurences of "space-axe" per first two minutes. Expand This comment got me to actually listen for a couple seconds, lol. I read what you said, and was assuming that someone was oddly pronouncing something regarding legislation (some "space act"), it never even occurred to me that it might be an odd pronunciation of SpaceX. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibb31 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/6/2018 at 7:49 PM, mikegarrison said: So that basically ends their funding, or what? Expand No, they are done with the flight testing milestone, so they can retire the flight test vehicle. Now, they can move on to building the Commercial Cargo vehicle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatastrophicFailure Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 8:30 AM, monophonic said: There was some talk about the first launch window possibly aiming really close to the orbit of a previously launched government satellite. Any idea if there were such "coincidences" this time around yet? Expand According to the article over on SpaceFlightNow.com, this time it was nowhere near that other thing. And the NRO has flatly disowned it at this point, which is unusual if it’s really theirs. On 1/8/2018 at 5:09 PM, tater said: Expand Could... could that mean a static fire today?? Would they livestream that, given the magnitude of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 There are private streams that appear for static tests. I think they roll out, then fire the next day, usually. They'd have to have closed the range, too, loads of roads would have to be closed when they fuel that up. It;s gonna stop everything within a few miles of 39A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatastrophicFailure Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 IIRC, the last rollout was just for fit checks. Maybe they’re going to do fueling tests now, even that would be impressive to see! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 They said static fire this week once Zuma left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB666 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 1:44 PM, tater said: SN is funded for COTS. I fully expect it to fly. Expand Yes, but after that, hanging from a bag in the closet with little white aromatic balls at the bottom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatastrophicFailure Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 ...sounds like that Tesla’s going to space, one way or another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shpaget Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 5:15 PM, CatastrophicFailure said: NRO has flatly disowned it at this point, which is unusual if it’s really theirs. Expand Which doesn't narrow it down much, since there are 15 other intelligence agencies in the US gov, and countless other that could very well be the owner. Somebody should mass spam every acronym agency and ask them if it's theirs XD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CastleKSide Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Is FH human-rated? I remember hearing it was able to launch D2 way back, but that was before a lot of the delays/redesigns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatastrophicFailure Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 6:45 PM, CastleKSide said: Is FH human-rated? I remember hearing it was able to launch D2 way back, but that was before a lot of the delays/redesigns Expand It’s not even machine-rated at this point , that’s what all these tests are for. But yes, the flight around the moon in a D2 is still on the agenda, so it’s still slated for man rating, probably along with the F9B5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibb31 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 5:51 PM, PB666 said: Yes, but after that, hanging from a bag in the closet with little white aromatic balls at the bottom. Expand Just like Cygnus, Dragon and CST-100 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB666 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 6:45 PM, CastleKSide said: Is FH human-rated? I remember hearing it was able to launch D2 way back, but that was before a lot of the delays/redesigns Expand lol, human rated? Are you volunteering? Thats kind of a hard way of getting a ride in a Tesla. Of course its' not human rated. There is no rated crew vehicle and the launch pad does not have crew access or crew safety stuff. I don't think there is a human rated vehicle that can be launched from the US, at least the whole package. Unless the Russians decide to launch a Soyuz from a boat in US waters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSEP Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 So Zuma is satellite destroyer? Thats the only thing i can think of beshides a resupply vessel of a small unmanned space station, and to be fair, it is sort of odd to have a top secret space station with no people to do stuff inside, so i doubt it is. On 1/8/2018 at 6:45 PM, CastleKSide said: Is FH human-rated? I remember hearing it was able to launch D2 way back, but that was before a lot of the delays/redesigns Expand Not yet but it is probably going to be in the future if they really want to send rich people around the Moon. Anyways, how does the D2 protect itself from radiation or is it going to jump over the Van Allen belts like Apollo did? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 On 1/8/2018 at 7:40 PM, PB666 said: lol, human rated? Are you volunteering? Thats kind of a hard way of getting a ride in a Tesla. Of course its' not human rated. There is no rated crew vehicle and the launch pad does not have crew access or crew safety stuff. I don't think there is a human rated vehicle that can be launched from the US, at least the whole package. Unless the Russians decide to launch a Soyuz from a boat in US waters. Expand Atlas is already man-rated. F9 Block 5 will be the man-rated F9, which is why they need to launch them soon. They have to launch 5 of them before people. Odd, since SLS will fly with people on the very first "all up" flight (EM-2). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.