Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, CatastrophicFailure said:

I was noticing that. Must make them easier to scrape off for the next customer. :D

I thought they were trying to save fairings for research purposes, not for reuse. At least not until they figure out how to consistrently catch them with a net.

Edited by sh1pman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sh1pman said:

I thought they were trying to save fairings for research purposes, not for reuse. At least not until they figure out how to consistrently catch them with a net.

Knowing how SpaceX simulates landings even when the stages are meant to be expended, they are probably doing both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Fraston said:

I thought the fairings are as useful as space junk when they are ejected...

So is a booster stage without fuel and landing legs. AFAIK farinigs' low density and large area makes them slow down faster so they don't get as hot as the first stage even though they have a similar velocity.

You can try doing this in KSP. Take a light thing (like an empty fuel tank) and attach a lot of airbrakes to it and reenter. Then take the same tank but filled with fuel and without airbrakes. Drop them from the same height with the same speed. The empty tank with lower density should slow down faster and experience less heat.

Edited by Wjolcz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sevenperforce said:

Who made this?!

First obvious one is the airlock you would want to go from crew space to cargo bay, external hatch is optional but nice if double as an docking port for crew transport. 
Would reduce the diameter of the central corridor, probably move the life support and critical system upward for easier access, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...