Minmus Taster Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Troubleshooting an issue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultimate Steve Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Update: It is saying that a hold will happen at T-40s if they haven't figured out the problem by then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Hold will be a T-40 seconds if the issue isn't resolved Just now, Ultimate Steve said: Update: It is saying that a hold will happen at T-40s if they haven't figured out the problem by then. Anything you can do I can do better : ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuke Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago had time to take a shower, i dont think i missed anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AckSed Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Ooo, peek inside Starlink factory on SX stream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago 35% chance of violating weather constraint Issue has been likely resolved T-5 minutes T-2 minutes, may hold at T-40 seconds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Saying they might hold up to a few minutes at t-40 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Hold confirmed Booster issue is resolved, now ship is being troubleshooted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSaint Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago This is why I'm not a commentator for SpaceX. I would be sitting there whistling "Girl from Ipanema". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Not looking great : / Countdown has resumed Hold : P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSaint Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago "Psyche!" Maybe I'd make the cut after all... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Scrub Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AckSed Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Dammit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuke Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago nope, the good news is i can sleep now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Scrub Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Possibly computer related I’m gathering Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrandedonEarth Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago I bet a wet dress rehearsal would have caught these issues… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, PakledHostage said: Not a fair comparison. Tens of thousands of planes land DAILY. Yes there will always be a tail, but these two tails differ by orders of magnitude. Ok, level the field. When the number of times any plane had landed was less than 1000 what was the failure on landing rate? Gimme a break Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 22 minutes ago, StrandedonEarth said: I bet a wet dress rehearsal would have caught these issues… This was a wet dress rehearsal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minmus Taster Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 12 minutes ago, JoeSchmuckatelli said: This was a wet dress rehearsal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago Gigabay to FL: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deddly Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 7 hours ago, darthgently said: When the number of times any plane had landed was less than 1000 what was the failure on landing rate? According to Wikipedia: Quote In 1928 and 1929, the overall accident rate was about 1 in every million miles (1.6 million kilometers) flown.[5] In today's industry, that accident rate would translate to about 7,000 fatal accidents each year. It doesn't list the ratio of crashes per flight, but we have a number for miles/kilometres per accident. If we can find the average distance of a flight in those early years, we could make a fairish comparison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.