Jump to content

Air Superiority Fighter Competition Continued

exbyde

By exbyde
in KSP1 Challenges & Mission ideas

 Share

Recommended Posts

exbyde

exbyde

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Box of Stardust said:

Ah, okay. I wasn't sure if this was, in fact, the correct interpretation of what was stated in the rules about updating fighters.

 

On 12/29/2017 at 9:43 AM, exbyde said:

8. Once you have submitted an aircraft, you may modify the file in KerbalX until the first test is run. No further mods can be run at that time. You are welcome to remove aircraft before testing (if you build something better and don't want to waste my time, thank you). Once an aircraft has made roster, it cannot be removed from the roster by administrative action and will continue to test, for fairness to other competitors.

Iff there is any variance/wiggle room in these rules, let me know. I try to make them as concise and to the point as possible to prevent conflict. As long as you modify the file within Kerbalx (upload a modified/updated file to the same page) before i download for testing, the latest mod will be tested. You should let me know if you create a new kerbalx page for an updated version of the craft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
exbyde

exbyde

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Box of Stardust said:

Well, I guess that's as clear as it can get. Ignore me then.

Sorry. Not trying to be rude, there have been instances of people doing things outside of these rules as a form of protest before their implementation.

Edited by exbyde
Link to comment
Share on other sites
exbyde

exbyde

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, l0kki said:

@exbyde when is my failure gonna get tested ääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääää

Yours was to be second but i'm putting your aircraft at the back of the queue for repeated rule violations (forum rules on swearing, thread rules on asking test dates)

new/old rule: Forum Rule 2.2g applies here (see the guidelines) in all languages. This includes the name of your aircraft.

Edited by exbyde
Link to comment
Share on other sites
exbyde

exbyde

Posted
  • Author
Posted

LAAAADIES AND GENTLEMEN! ITS TIME FOR SOME AIR SUPERIORITY FIGHTER COMBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT!!!

Lets start things off tonight with the Return of the King, The Crucifier, @goduranus' Crusader! And in the other corner, @dundun92's DU-1b!!!

 

 

In the end, this blasphemous battle ends with the Crusader being crucified by the Du-1b. But don't go anywhere, folks, because this cross between religion and aviation will be greeting our next contestant, THE COOKIE! and of course gets an honorable mention as "Pontius Pilot"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, l0kki said:

@exbyde when is my failure gonna get tested ääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääääää

 

1 hour ago, exbyde said:

Yours was to be second but i'm putting your aircraft at the back of the queue for repeated rule violations (forum rules on swearing, thread rules on asking test dates)

new/old rule: Forum Rule 2.2g applies here (see the guidelines) in all languages. This includes the name of your aircraft.

See what happenes when you are impatient @l0kki?

9 minutes ago, exbyde said:

THE COOKIE!

Oh boy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GillyMonster

GillyMonster

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, exbyde said:

Alright, next up we have @Eidahlil's Cookie...which I can only describe as an exceedingly violent ceiling fan.

While it may not have placed, in part to a friendly fire incident, it does get an honorable mention "Instructions unclear".

The Cookie was so much more epic than I thought.  That was awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Box of Stardust

Box of Stardust

Posted
Posted

I describe it as 'a really angry cloud'.

I can still remember my shock at the Cookie when I first tested against it. 

The drogue chute deployment was the most 'WHAT' moment ever. It all made sense when it started fighting. 

Kinda sad it didn't place, would've liked to see it sit in #3 for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
exbyde

exbyde

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Box of Stardust said:

I describe it as 'a really angry cloud'.

I can still remember my shock at the Cookie when I first tested against it. 

The drogue chute deployment was the most 'WHAT' moment ever. It all made sense when it started fighting. 

Kinda sad it didn't place, would've liked to see it sit in #3 for a while.

Probably something worth Eidahlil's time to tune slightly. its a nice change in pace from the usual. Waiting on him to submit the flying shark on his profile next.

Alright, next up, @dundun92 has graced us with a new revision of his current Du-3, the 3x. Per the norm, if the Du-3x can rise the ranks to the same level as the Du-3, it will replace it and continue testing.

Aaand judging by this encounter with @goduranus crusader, that is likely to happen.

***!8v8 has been TRIGGERED!*** Du-3 vs Du-3x

Edited by exbyde
Link to comment
Share on other sites
exbyde

exbyde

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Box of Stardust said:

Donut battle?

better. 8v8 and 7v7 battles.

So, this happened:

First Du-3 vs Du-3x battle ended in a stalemate. The Du-3x was damaged but flyable, and the Du-3 was out of ammo...what to do, what to do....Technically this satisfies rule 2b, all aircraft technically were disabled. The Du-3x with its gimp wing couldn't get on the du-3's if it wanted to, and the Du-3x was out of ammo...so... @dundun92

8v8 Battle of the Dunn!

Bonus, 7v7 Cookie ( @Eidahlil) vs Du-3x

Needless to say, the Du-3x is not proceeding or replacing the Du-3, so the roster remains the same. The cookie on the other hand may warrant further testing once i re-unoptimize my settings for better graphics.

9 minutes ago, HeroBrian_333 said:

*looks at almost perfected Harbinger Prototype*

*looks at Du-3 models*

*realizes they are almost identical*

*cries*

Submit it anyways

Edited by exbyde
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Box of Stardust

Box of Stardust

Posted
Posted

Surviving against Cookies is really a matter of surviving the initial merge, because it's when they're at their strongest. With the BD AI, since they always start rushing at one another, enemy fighters are always going to be forced to make the assault against a very, very angry thunderstorm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
exbyde

exbyde

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Alright, and for our last fights of the night, we have @Dundun65C 's DDD taking on @dundun92's Du-1b and Du-3

Against the likes of the Du-1b with its inferior engines and delta setup, the DDD shines and makes quick work of the enemy drones

Against the Du-3, however, the DDD gets butchered very easily, landing the DDD in the #4 spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...