Jump to content

NASA's Dragonfly mission to Titan


Recommended Posts

If I understand correctly, driving a rover on Mars is basically like: "OK, we've spent the past week finishing the terrain survey from the rover's current position, and the third party control agrees it's safe to continue onwards. Today's business for the entire team is making sure the rover traverses the next fifteen centimeters of landscape as calmly and controlled as possible. Maybe we can go ten more centimeters next week if everything goes well."

Okay, maybe not that slow, but still, the rovers aren't built for a pace faster than that of a walking plush toy whose batteries are about to run out. How would they handle helicopter operations on a body so much further away than Mars?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Codraroll said:

If I understand correctly, driving a rover on Mars is basically like: "OK, we've spent the past week finishing the terrain survey from the rover's current position, and the third party control agrees it's safe to continue onwards. Today's business for the entire team is making sure the rover traverses the next fifteen centimeters of landscape as calmly and controlled as possible. Maybe we can go ten more centimeters next week if everything goes well."

Okay, maybe not that slow, but still, the rovers aren't built for a pace faster than that of a walking plush toy whose batteries are about to run out. How would they handle helicopter operations on a body so much further away than Mars?

My guess is they want to figure all this out with Mars 2020 and it's cubecopter. That thing will have to be autonomous even on Mars because the delay there is significant too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Codraroll said:

If I understand correctly, driving a rover on Mars is basically like: "OK, we've spent the past week finishing the terrain survey from the rover's current position, and the third party control agrees it's safe to continue onwards. Today's business for the entire team is making sure the rover traverses the next fifteen centimeters of landscape as calmly and controlled as possible. Maybe we can go ten more centimeters next week if everything goes well."

Okay, maybe not that slow, but still, the rovers aren't built for a pace faster than that of a walking plush toy whose batteries are about to run out. How would they handle helicopter operations on a body so much further away than Mars?

It's much easier to find a good landing site, than plot out a route to drive in a boulder strewn landscape, as you don't need anywhere near the amount of good terrain. Also, aerial photograph really helps these things! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Codraroll said:

If I understand correctly, driving a rover on Mars is basically like: "OK, we've spent the past week finishing the terrain survey from the rover's current position, and the third party control agrees it's safe to continue onwards. Today's business for the entire team is making sure the rover traverses the next fifteen centimeters of landscape as calmly and controlled as possible. Maybe we can go ten more centimeters next week if everything goes well."

Okay, maybe not that slow, but still, the rovers aren't built for a pace faster than that of a walking plush toy whose batteries are about to run out. How would they handle helicopter operations on a body so much further away than Mars?

Flight is easier as you only need an safe landing area with no large rocks or slopes who can tilt you. 
This is even more important on titan as you will have no direct control, you just program an jump and execute. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MinimumSky5 said:

It's much easier to find a good landing site, than plot out a route to drive in a boulder strewn landscape, as you don't need anywhere near the amount of good terrain. Also, aerial photograph really helps these things! 

It may be, but helicopter must choose landing site fully autonomously. There will be no orbiting probes to survey good landing sites (or is it included in mission) and no time to wait instructions from Earth. I am quite sure, that RTG does not produce even near enough energy for continuous flying. They must load batteries slowly and then they can fly a short trip.

That will be very interesting project. Real science and not manned circus tricks which are now so fashionable. I really hope that it will success in my lifetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NASA has used Cassini data to select a landing site and timing for calm weather.
 

Quote

 It will first land at the equatorial “Shangri-La” dune fields, which are terrestrially similar to the linear dunes in Namibia in southern Africa and offer a diverse sampling location. Dragonfly will explore this region in short flights, building up to a series of longer “leapfrog” flights of up to 5 miles (8 kilometers), stopping along the way to take samples from compelling areas with diverse geography. It will finally reach the Selk impact crater, where there is evidence of past liquid water, organics – the complex molecules that contain carbon, combined with hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen – and energy, which together make up the recipe for life. The lander will eventually fly more than 108 miles (175 kilometers) – nearly double the distance traveled to date by all the Mars rovers combined.
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasas-dragonfly-will-fly-around-titan-looking-for-origins-signs-of-life/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, magnemoe said:

Flight is easier as you only need an safe landing area with no large rocks or slopes who can tilt you. 
This is even more important on titan as you will have no direct control, you just program an jump and execute. 

Your mileage may vary. I bought "simple" and "slow" RC-aircraft to my daughter and I have to say that it is crazy hard compared to RC car, which is probably much harder to drive that very slow all wheel driving rover. I hope that there are dead calm weathers at Titan during the mission.

I have also had a coaxial helicopter and based on my experience I am happy that my job is not to program automatic flight algorithm for use in conditions turning flipped helicopter (and changing of rotor blades) costs billions and take decades.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hannu2 said:

Your mileage may vary. I bought "simple" and "slow" RC-aircraft to my daughter and I have to say that it is crazy hard compared to RC car, which is probably much harder to drive that very slow all wheel driving rover. I hope that there are dead calm weathers at Titan during the mission.

I have also had a coaxial helicopter and based on my experience I am happy that my job is not to program automatic flight algorithm for use in conditions turning flipped helicopter (and changing of rotor blades) costs billions and take decades.

 

For humans yes, for us navigating on ground is easier, for computers its the other way around. 
Far less stuff to worry about: wind turbulence and not landing to hard. On issue is that stuff happens much faster who is not much of an problem for an computer. 

Also for an rover its problems increase as its get smaller as its easier for it to get stuck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Earth 1 kW/kg is good for a quadcopter.  On titan maybe 6-8 kg per kw?

Batteries are good for about 0.2 kWh/kg.

Plutonium 238 is good for 0.5 kW/kg thermal... probably about 0.05 kW/kg electrical for the entire system.  So 1 kg of RTG can charge 6 kg of batteries per day.  And that is enough for a 1kW unit to fly for over an hour (72 minutes) per day.

Polonium RTG's could run continuously, but they would have to be made in the Jovian magnetic field and replaced every year.

There is no chance a thing like this could carry its own solar panels on Titan and have a decent charging rate.

It should have legs rather than skids.  Insects have no trouble landing on tilted or uneven surfaces.  Skids are only better if you want to slide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, farmerben said:

It should have legs rather than skids.  Insects have no trouble landing on tilted or uneven surfaces.  Skids are only better if you want to slide.

Skids imply a box structure, which is inherently stronger than individual legs for the same mass. Perhaps that's a factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huzzah! I've been rooting for this to be selected ever since I heard about the proposal, back when it was just one of 12 proposed missions. Titan is definitely worthy of a detailed investigation. It's especially good that this was picked considering that the alternative (a proposal called CAESAR) was lame and unoriginal in the extreme: sample return from where else but our old friend 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Yeah, sample return from a comet's nucleus would be nice in a general sense, but when you compare that with the chance to send a freakin' quadcopter to Titan, well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a promising destination to be sending missions to imo, not because it’s an interesting place but because it says to me that things are getting real. Titan is probably one of the most valuable resources in the solar system $_$!

Just as promising as NASA wanting to get back to the moon (Luna) to start checking out some of these southern pole craters. It might be interesting science but I’m sure it also has something to do with getting to the best resource locations before China lol... 

Maybe with space being on the verge of opening up to commercial interests, we are seeing the beginnings of the next goldrush.^_^!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Dale Christopher said:

It’s a promising destination to be sending missions to imo, not because it’s an interesting place but because it says to me that things are getting real. Titan is probably one of the most valuable resources in the solar system $_$!

Just as promising as NASA wanting to get back to the moon (Luna) to start checking out some of these southern pole craters. It might be interesting science but I’m sure it also has something to do with getting to the best resource locations before China lol... 

Maybe with space being on the verge of opening up to commercial interests, we are seeing the beginnings of the next goldrush.^_^!

Do you want a target for the goldrush? Check out this puppy :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16_Psyche

This single asteroid contains 1% of the mass of the whole Asteroid Belt!

If it is indeed exposed metallic core of a shattered protoplanet, there might be untold riches in valuable metals contained inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

15 hours ago, mikegarrison said:

Skids imply a box structure, which is inherently stronger than individual legs for the same mass. Perhaps that's a factor.

Skids also let you touch down with a bit of lateral velocity (just a bit, mind you) which might be helpful when landing in windy conditions. That being said, I suspect that there simply isn't enough energy flux on Titan to create meaningful winds.

On 6/28/2019 at 2:15 AM, kerbiloid said:

Let's hope their rotors can work at -180°C, while landing legs won't melt the surface.

Thermal management will be heavily controlled, with only the parts that actually require it being heated. The RTG provides a convenient source of heat, so I suspect something like a 'thermos' configuration where all of the electronics and batteries are stored in a heavily insulated box with heat pipes from the RTG to keep warm. The electric motors will probably use electric heaters while the batteries are charging, and to supplement them while in flight.  The rotors themselves will probably be as cold as the air, plus conductive heating from the motors (this will probably be the largest source of convective cooling because of the mass flow across the blades). The lower structure will probably be nearly as cold as the surface, because if they aren't that means you're wasting heat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mitchz95 said:

How much faster could Dragonfly get to Titan if it launched on a Starship and refueled in orbit? Eight years is a long time to wait. :P

Elon Musk tweeted a while ago (don’t have a link...I don’t really want to wade into the enormous mess of Twitter :P) that Starships could get heavy payloads really far if unnecessary hardware was removed, like the legs and heatshield, essentially creating an expendable stage. If a stripped-down Starship can get big payloads a long way, imagine how fast it can get the relatively light Dragonfly payload to Titan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
  • 6 months later...

Sorry for the necromancing but Dragonfly's review and launch have been postponed and liftoff is now targeted in 2028;

https://spacenews.com/nasa-postpones-dragonfly-review-launch-date/

I'll admit I'm starting to become concerned for this mission, at least in it's current form, these cuts to the budget are quite extreme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish people could make direct donations to specific government programs.  But, alas, this would be unconstitutional as it bypasses Congress' budgetary control.  One can donate to government, but Congress gets to decide where your money goes.  Yeah....nope

Edited by darthgently
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...