taniwha Posted October 15, 2016 Author Share Posted October 15, 2016 drtedastro: you will have little luck. NREs are not caused by config files, but by bad code. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taniwha Posted October 15, 2016 Author Share Posted October 15, 2016 Ok, I've released 5.8.1 fixing the NRE (in theory, since I don't have any such configs, but it was the only possible source of an exception, so I'm pretty confident) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drtedastro Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 (edited) downloaded and testing now. many thanks You nailed it !!! Loaded without any problems at all. Great work an thanks again. Cheers.. Edited October 15, 2016 by drtedastro updated info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taniwha Posted October 15, 2016 Author Share Posted October 15, 2016 1 hour ago, drtedastro said: Loaded without any problems at all. Ah, thanks for the report. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OddFunction Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 6 hours ago, taniwha said: Ah, thanks for the report. 5.8 - Couldn't load in 5.8.1 - Works great so far Will update with any bugs. Thank you for your effort! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OddFunction Posted October 16, 2016 Share Posted October 16, 2016 Is it normal for some stock tanks to have no 'remove all tanks' button? I can edit other tanks, but not the stock one (except jet fuseladge). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taniwha Posted October 16, 2016 Author Share Posted October 16, 2016 5 hours ago, OddFunction said: I can edit other tanks, but not the stock one (except jet fuseladge). You will have to be more specific. I did my testing with the FL-T400. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ss8913 Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 @taniwha - are you not supporting CKAN or are they just having problems? Noted that this and EPL are showing 1.2 on the forums, but not on CKAN. Is this a "wait a while for it to show up" or is this a "I don't put my mods on CKAN anymore and you should download them by hand" ? I'm ok with either, I just need to know so I know what to do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taniwha Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) I have never put my mods on CKAN, someone else did, so I guess it's just wait for it to show up if you don't feel like doing it by hand. [edit] That said, if CKAN is relying on .version files, that might explain EL. I've just uploaded EL.version, so... Edited October 18, 2016 by taniwha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OddFunction Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 (edited) On 10/18/2016 at 1:58 AM, taniwha said: I have never put my mods on CKAN, someone else did, so I guess it's just wait for it to show up if you don't feel like doing it by hand. [edit] That said, if CKAN is relying on .version files, that might explain EL. I've just uploaded EL.version, so... That doesn't upset you at all? On 10/16/2016 at 9:28 AM, OddFunction said: Is it normal for some stock tanks to have no 'remove all tanks' button? I can edit other tanks, but not the stock one (except jet fuseladge). I researched more into this. It's the "Porkjet overhaul pack" parts that do not have editable tanks. This is more noticeable to me, because I use a MM config to hide the stock equivalents of Porkjets Overhaul Pack. That means that all my 'stock' tanks that show up in the editor are actually Porkjets version, which I'm assuming, is missing yet another MM config to make these parts editable? Hope that came out coherently. Edited October 29, 2016 by OddFunction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taniwha Posted October 30, 2016 Author Share Posted October 30, 2016 Ah, yes, I guess I need to install his overhaul (just never got around to it) and generate some configs for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taniwha Posted October 30, 2016 Author Share Posted October 30, 2016 4 hours ago, OddFunction said: That doesn't upset you at all? Not at all. That's how Free Software works. Most of my mods are GPL or LGPL, and those that aren't are because I inherited them with a different license. Even people coming to me with problems caused by CKAN doesn't upset me so long as they accept that I am unable to help them when the problem is out of my hands (there are times when I can give some advice). It would actually be rather hypocritical of me to get upset as I use Debian, which is a large part of the basis of CKAN's model (along with CPAN, but perl gives me hives worse than Windows does). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OddFunction Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 55 minutes ago, taniwha said: Not at all. That's how Free Software works. Most of my mods are GPL or LGPL, and those that aren't are because I inherited them with a different license. Even people coming to me with problems caused by CKAN doesn't upset me so long as they accept that I am unable to help them when the problem is out of my hands (there are times when I can give some advice). It would actually be rather hypocritical of me to get upset as I use Debian, which is a large part of the basis of CKAN's model (along with CPAN, but perl gives me hives worse than Windows does). The bolded would be the biggest thing I wondered about. But it seems as though you're a pretty chill individual. That's refreshing! 1 hour ago, taniwha said: Ah, yes, I guess I need to install his overhaul (just never got around to it) and generate some configs for them. Sounds wonderful. No hurry at all though, of course, as we have plenty of workarounds with the already available tanks. Jet Fuel tanks I've found to be particularly useful for just about everything. In any case thanks for being so responsive. The community sure does appreciate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COL.R.Neville Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 anyone know why ksp is flagging mft as incompatible? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phineas Freak Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 @COL.R.Neville because it is also "revision - locked". Changing the revision number and doing a recomplile is required. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taniwha Posted November 5, 2016 Author Share Posted November 5, 2016 I've released version 5.8.2 of Modular Fuel Tanks. It has been updated for KSP 1.2.1 and includes configs for porkjet's parts overhall "mod". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iSilver Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Thank you for this brilliant mod, I'm using this mod along with Tweakscale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyko Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 (edited) Love this mod! Thanks It's working with Procedural Parts no problem. Feature Request - In the UI, could you include an "add a tank" option that actually adds both an LF and OX tank in the correct ratios? Edited November 26, 2016 by tjt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COL.R.Neville Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 20 hours ago, tjt said: Love this mod! Thanks It's working with Procedural Parts no problem. Feature Request - In the UI, could you include an "add a tank" option that actually adds both an LF and OX tank in the correct ratios? its already there. well sorta. just hit remove all tanks from the tank and then connect an lfo engine and a new button for the 45/55 lfo ratio will appear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taniwha Posted November 27, 2016 Author Share Posted November 27, 2016 I think he wants to configure a smaller 45/55 ratio set of tanks than the full capacity. If so, the current way to do that would be to put in the other resources first then use the 45/55 LFO button. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danfarnsy Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 (edited) 5 hours ago, taniwha said: I think he wants to configure a smaller 45/55 ratio set of tanks than the full capacity. If so, the current way to do that would be to put in the other resources first then use the 45/55 LFO button. I sometimes add a filler, like xenon, use the 45/55 LFO button, then remove the xenon. It works, but is clunky. It could be useful to have an LFO tank option. Edited November 27, 2016 by danfarnsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taniwha Posted November 27, 2016 Author Share Posted November 27, 2016 No argument on the usefulness of such a button. I need to get around to it, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyko Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 12 hours ago, taniwha said: No argument on the usefulness of such a button. I need to get around to it, though. wonderful! I was thinking more along the lines of what @danfarnsy said - add a small monopropellant capacity and then fill the rest of the tank with LFO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COL.R.Neville Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 isnt there a tank definition that goes somewhere so he can just add danfancypants tank type? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linuxgurugamer Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 Is this 1.2.2 compatible? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.