POLL: What would you like Added/improved?

[Talavar]

I was wondering what the general consensus was among the player base of KSP of what they would like to see next if they only had one choice of the following.

New planets/star systems

Improved water landings (ships easily break apart currently)

More Kerbal jobs (such as pilot, etc)

More space station parts with purpose

Better/more autopilot controls in Vanilla for pilots

More science parts (in general)

Rebalancing of administration programs

Mining facilities

[Franklin]

FAR or NEAR

[Franklin]

but yeah water's also an ugly blue sheet of concrete right now.

and long-term orbitals have little purpose. stations/satellites need a reason to exist beyond gas stations and contract camping.

[Alshain]

I just want bugs fixed. I've played for all of 3 hours in 0.90 and so much for beta, this is business as usual. This is the buggiest version since I bought the game.

[soulsource]

What I'd like to see: Bug fixing and balancing.

[Yemo]

Balancing, especially with regards to contracts/economy/difficulty settings. I tested hard difficulty and ended up converting science into funds. Biomes/old school science was nearly irrelevant, a few simple low gravity minmus surveys and I didnt know were to put all those science points.

[Daze]

-new aero

-procedurale fairings

-mapsat stock

-working space station

[m4v]

More content in the current planets, new planets aren't going to change that there's not much to sightsee or do.

[LordFerret]

Expanded biomes, like on Kerbin itself; And docking cameras... with self-illuminated docking ports... with targets.

[Pecan]

deltaV display. Of the above, mining.

[Bill Phil]

Procedural fairings don't make sense at all. It isn't very "lego" like and as such isn't very kerbal. Fairings like KW Rocketry are actually a gameplay mechanic as well. It limits the SIZE of the PAYLOAD.

[Rolanvorxariat]

I dont know how many times i've said this, but Gas Planet 2. though i do want bug fixes, more station/base/science parts to give them a purpose, and a better tech tree.and a new contract system. but ignore all these, just GP2.

[Superfluous J]

Of those proposed, I chose mining facilities. They're high on my list.

But top of my personal list now is a reworked aerodynamic model. In addition to that I'd like joint parts so you can fold your ships up while launching. The ability to clip stuff into your rocket makes procedural fairings less necessary but without some sort of arm or hinge or something, you're still going to have so many times when you need to launch something small but there's no way to make it fit in basic fairings.

And dV displays. Always and forever.

[RobotsAndSpaceships]

Oh please, less deadly water, for now mods can provide resources and mining, and theres no reason not to use them, but I hate seeing the spaceplanes that don't make it off the runway that I try to ditch get ripped into a thousand pieces.

[Voculus]

64-bit support the instant Unity 5 is available.

[RobotsAndSpaceships]

64-bit support the instant Unity 5 is available.

Ooh, that too.

[Talavar]

Oh please, less deadly water, for now mods can provide resources and mining, and theres no reason not to use them, but I hate seeing the spaceplanes that don't make it off the runway that I try to ditch get ripped into a thousand pieces.

I was pretty certain this one would get a lot of votes when I made this poll... Actually, I voted improved water landings myself.. lol

[timsfitz]

For me, stock resource mining only barely beats out new planets and moons. I've been everywhere so many times it's hard to get enthusiastic about even going to other planets anymore. The added biomes will help a little, but other planets and even more advanced propulsion systems and other star systems would make the game perfect for me.

[RocketPilot573]

I would usually say improved aerodynamics all the way, however apparently that's .91...

[MalfunctionM1Ke]

I would like to have a Kerbal-Main-Story that still gives me freedom to do what I want instead of those crazy and random Fineprint contracts.

[Talavar]

deltaV display. Of the above, mining.

DV display WOULD be a nice addition!

[Robotengineer]

In addition to the things that have been confirmed/suspected, I would like to see Dmagic orbital science stock'd or at least realistic science.

[HafCoJoe]

I'd like more station parts or science parts. Could be quite useful for building.

[Wanderfound]

None of the options provided.

Instrumentation. We need to be able to see what we're doing.

Something equivalent to Kerbal Flight Data. Ideally, we'd get a stockified Raster Prop Monitor​ as well.

Edited December 23, 2014 by Wanderfound

[billbobjebkirk]

I would like to see more planets, more in-depth planetary science, and more exciting terrain on other planets. for example look at these images(http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/images.html) from the Spirit and Opportunity rovers. That's the kind of stuff I'd like to see.

For science, I'd like to see stuff that encourages sample analysis and return, and would encourage building rovers or hoppers to look at multiple sites.

EDIT: of course, these are just things I'd like to have. My real request would be to finish up things like IVAs, art assets, and planets

Edited December 23, 2014 by billbobjebkirk