[1.1.x] KSPX - Kerbal Stock Part eXpansion mod reposted v0.2.10.1 | 20/4/16

[stupid_chris]

I mean.. can I make some smaller jets and you add it to the pack?

No. This is not my parts, I only have redistribution rights.

[8749236]

No. This is not my parts, I only have redistribution rights.

I see, thank you.

Is it legal to use stock model for my tiny jet engines if I want to post my parts? Or I have to make my own model?

[stupid_chris]

I see, thank you.

Is it legal to use stock model for my tiny jet engines if I want to post my parts? Or I have to make my own model?

It's kind of a grey area. You're allowed to create new textures you would slap on them, or to merge the models with others through MM files, but the game's license is All Rights Reserved, so basically you're not allowed to take assets from the game, modify them, and then redistribute them.

[8749236]

It's kind of a grey area. You're allowed to create new textures you would slap on them, or to merge the models with others through MM files, but the game's license is All Rights Reserved, so basically you're not allowed to take assets from the game, modify them, and then redistribute them.

Can I just use them to make a welded part?

[stupid_chris]

Yes. As long as you're not moidying the assets themselves. You can't modify the files themselves, that's about it.

[undercoveryankee]

Can I just use them to make a welded part?

Using a MODEL {} node in your part's config to reference a stock model and rescale, weld, or retexture it is fine. Copying Squad's .mu file or stock textures into your package that you're distributing is where it becomes a problem.

[NathanKell]

undercoveryankee: Actually, we *do* have permission to do that with Squad assets in GameData. But these aren't Squad assets, so the license (in the OP) is different.

[8749236]

Thanks to all of you guys =D

All I have to do now is to figure out how to post a mod... properly!..

[LawnDartLeo]

Anything the community can do to help facilitate a 0.90 update? I use this and I loose some textures on other parts. Not sure what that is all about. Happy to edit files, test, whatever... or just shut up and wait. I miss my KSPX parts.

[Whirligig Girl]

Most of this stuff is kinda redundant or added by other mods. The only real advantage I can think of is the ION-2. Maybe the thin 2.5m monoprop tank.

[stupid_chris]

Anything the community can do to help facilitate a 0.90 update? I use this and I loose some textures on other parts. Not sure what that is all about. Happy to edit files, test, whatever... or just shut up and wait. I miss my KSPX parts.

Everything *works*. Really I have the update halfway done and there's barely any change at all except for slight rebalancing.

[passinglurker]

Everything *works*. Really I have the update halfway done and there's barely any change at all except for slight rebalancing.

and fixing the 1.25meter ion's tech tree node?

[stupid_chris]

and fixing the 1.25meter ion's tech tree node?

Yes, *barely* any change except rebalance.

[Alewx]

and fixing the 1.25meter ion's tech tree node?

That would be extremely awesome.

[LawnDartLeo]

Everything *works*. Really I have the update halfway done and there's barely any change at all except for slight rebalancing.

I'll test again... Convinced its KSPX that causes texture loss on the KSOS tank and boosters.

[stupid_chris]

I'll test again... Convinced its KSPX that causes texture loss on the KSOS tank and boosters.

You've got some really really weird convictions. KSPX is just parts.

Anyway, there you go, v0.2.8

Changelog:

v0.2.8

[FIX] Fixed the tech nodes of the 1.25m ion engine and xenon tank
[FEATURE] Changed the category of each part to meet the new categories of 0.90
[FEATURE] Modified the old cupola to match the stats of the new one
[BALANCE] Rebalanced all the reaction wheels part with stock progression
[FEATURE] The stock Inline Reaction Wheel is resized to 1.25m again through ModuleManager to leave the spot to the KSPX one
[BALANCE] MM modifications to all stock Reaction Wheels to even out a spot for each with stock balance
[FEATURE] Changed config/folder names to be clearer

Have fun y'all.

NOTE:

Make sure you completely delete any previous KSPX installation before updating, names have changed and it's gonna break stuff if you don't delete.

Edited February 13, 2015 by stupid_chris

[robson1000]

Error in MM patch

@PART[advSasModule]:FOR[KSPX]
{
    @MODULE[ModuleReactionWheel[COLOR=#ff0000]¸[/COLOR] <-- HERE
    {
        @PitchTorque = 10
        @YawTorque = 10
        @RollTorque = 10

        @RESOURCE[ElectricCharge]
        {
            @rate = 0.25
        }
    }

    MODULE
    {
        name = ModuleSAS
    }
}

[stupid_chris]

Error in MM patch

@PART[advSasModule]:FOR[KSPX]
{
    @MODULE[ModuleReactionWheel[COLOR=#ff0000]¸[/COLOR] <-- HERE
    {
        @PitchTorque = 10
        @YawTorque = 10
        @RollTorque = 10

        @RESOURCE[ElectricCharge]
        {
            @rate = 0.25
        }
    }

    MODULE
    {
        name = ModuleSAS
    }
}

Thanks

Changelog:

v0.2.8.1

[FIX] Fixed the typo in the ModuleManager patch for the Inline Advanced Stabilizer.

Should fix that issue.

[lajoswinkler]

stupid_chris, your LV-NB engine is going to Sarnus.

[FreeThinker]

Nice models but the gallery could use some short disciptions

[lajoswinkler]

Is there a way to modify the large NERVA engine to use LF only?

[Randazzo]

Is there a way to modify the large NERVA engine to use LF only?

In theory you could simply remove the

PROPELLANT

{

name = Oxidizer

ratio = 1.1

}

bit from the part CFG file.

I have not tried to do this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work. I'd backup the CFG file before editing, unless you've already tried this.

[lajoswinkler]

Indeed, this does help, thanks.

This is the result.

I've just removed the LV-NB's oxidizer need.

As you can see, it is crazy overpowered so it needs to be tweaked to behave like two stock engines again.

Edited April 28, 2015 by lajoswinkler

[FireFaced]

Is this 1.0 compatible? My guess is it doesn't but I still wanted to ask.

[stupid_chris]

There's likely a few things to patch, it's next on my todo list given RealChute is now stable.