ThaZeus Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 -1 (-) @Evanitis you got to love Garfield minus Garfield! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evanitis Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 (edited) 0 (+) It's too boring to only post numbers, and GmG spam is good enough, so I don't have to think what else to post besides the numbers. Edited January 17, 2016 by Evanitis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matuchkin Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 -1 [-] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evanitis Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 0 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceplaneAddict Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 -1 [-] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evanitis Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 0 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceplaneAddict Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 -1 [-] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaZeus Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 -2 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dfthu Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 -1 (+1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaZeus Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 -2 (-) I always have to turn off nature documentaries when they show these scenes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceplaneAddict Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 -3 [-] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaZeus Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 (edited) -4 (-) XKCD! Another bad problem is if you're flying toward space and the parts start to fall off your space car in the wrong order. If that happens, it means you won't go to space today, or maybe ever. Edited January 18, 2016 by ThaZeus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matuchkin Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 You should by Randall Munroe's new book, Thing Explainer. Basically that, but with more diagrams and explanations. -5 [-] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaZeus Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 -6 (-) already have. To be fair, my job at NASA was working on robots and didn't actually involve any orbital mechanics. The small positive slope over that period is because it turns out that if you hang around at NASA, you get in a lot of conversations about space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norpo Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 -7 [-] Reportedly, double-walled inflatable balls like this exist somewhere. Now to find that place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dfthu Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 -6 (+1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 I request a revert.... to the last round: On 1/17/2016 at 4:06 PM, Matuchkin said: Let's fight this to the end, brotha. 75 [-] On 1/17/2016 at 4:07 PM, SpaceplaneAddict said: -74. [-] Forever and always. On 1/17/2016 at 4:16 PM, Dfthu said: 75 (+1) Back to 75. I'm going to wait for GM confirmation, because this is such a far back revert. @RainDreamer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainDreamer Posted January 18, 2016 Author Share Posted January 18, 2016 Currently I am discussing a bit with the other GMs about the case. It has some future implications and may warrant some change of the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainDreamer Posted January 18, 2016 Author Share Posted January 18, 2016 (edited) 9 hours ago, Mad Rocket Scientist said: I request a revert.... to the last round: Back to 75. I'm going to wait for GM confirmation, because this is such a far back revert. @RainDreamer We find that this case doesn't warrant for a revert, as it is not a major error that require our intervention. The positive wins stays. The game may proceed as normal, and small change was made to rule 6, in that small errors are fine for a win if no one catches it, and it doesn't have to be errors about numbers. Edited January 18, 2016 by RainDreamer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubinator Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 Looks like we're continuing on! -5 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dfthu Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 Ok! -4 (+1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evanitis Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 -3 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dfthu Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 -2 (+1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monstah Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 -3 (minus) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adsii1970 Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 -4 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts