Wildcat111 Posted September 6, 2016 Share Posted September 6, 2016 -81 (-) @Mycroft @JoseEduardo @Atlas2342 @UnionPacific1983WP @PB666 @The Raging Sandwich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnionPacific1983WP Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -82 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Raging Sandwich Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -81 (+) Also @Wildcat111, why do you keep mentioning people? Just wondering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat111 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -83 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseEduardo Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -84 (-) I'm pretty sure that -80 thing was already solved... oh well, let's get this back to -100 for the third time then, shall we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vysionone Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -83 (+) After this round, I quit and am not going back. Unless I feel like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseEduardo Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -84 (-) we shall get this back to -100 a third time! (like a volleyball match) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat111 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -85 (-) 3 minutes ago, JoseEduardo said: we shall get this back to -100 a third time! (like a volleyball match) YES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseEduardo Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -86 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat111 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -87 (-) WE SHALL SUCCEED THIS TIME! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseEduardo Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -88 (-) indeed! TO GLORY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat111 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 -89 (-) FOR NEGATIVES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 (edited) Again, please do not continue to play after the GMs say that the round is in review. Only the GMs may revert after that point. Edited September 7, 2016 by Dman979 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat111 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 1 minute ago, Dman979 said: Again, please do not continue to play after the GMs say that the round is in review. Only the GMs may revert after that point. Why did you post 2 times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 Just now, Wildcat111 said: Why did you post 2 times I'm sorry? What do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB666 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 7 minutes ago, Wildcat111 said: Why did you post 2 times ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat111 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, Dman979 said: I'm sorry? What do you mean? You posted the same post 2 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 Just now, Wildcat111 said: You posted the same post 2 times. Where? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat111 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 7 minutes ago, Dman979 said: Where? When you said: Again, please do not continue to play after the GMs say that the round is in review. Only the GMs may revert after that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 Just now, Wildcat111 said: When you said: Again, please do not continue to play after the GMs say that the round is in review. Only the GMs may revert after that point. What's the other one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat111 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 7 minutes ago, Dman979 said: Where? When you said: Again, please do not continue to play after the GMs say that the round is in review. Only the GMs may revert after that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 I'm sorry, I'm really confused here by what you're saying. Are you asking why I said that the round is in review? That's because it is in review and not in play, despite what PB666 brought up. We're still deciding and going through the posts right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat111 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 15 minutes ago, Dman979 said: I'm sorry, I'm really confused here by what you're saying. Are you asking why I said that the round is in review? That's because it is in review and not in play, despite what PB666 brought up. We're still deciding and going through the posts right now. Nevermind, it must something wrong in my computer. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 @PB666, does that mean we might have to do this a third time? Aw gee. Getting a little tired of this. Hope that the mods decide otherwise. If this round ever finishes, afterwards I'll be scaling back my participation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB666 Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 On 9/6/2016 at 10:16 PM, Mycroft said: @PB666, does that mean we might have to do this a third time? Aw gee. Getting a little tired of this. Hope that the mods decide otherwise. If this round ever finishes, afterwards I'll be scaling back my participation. They have to make a decision whether duplicates of the same number have to be qualified in the next posting. It seems by rain-dreamers interpretation in the last correction they do. Their interpretation is not mine, mine was that if you edit a number an null it, as I did, then it was no longer a number and you could post another number. Concerning the previous revert. According to that part of the interpretation: To edit a number and otherwise nullify it meant it was no longer a number, just like text or anything else, therefore you wouldn't be following a number if you added a new post, which I did, but unfortunately the forum server updates consecutive posts by appending them. So the current interpretation is that if you post a number and its an error, you cannot delete, you cannot alter it and it cannot be followed unless you detail why it was an error and which post should be followed. If two post occurred in the same minute, then the last is valid and no error occurred, but if not, then an error occurred and the next posting should have the correct post identified. Theoretically a duplication should not be a problem, since it is not ambiguous which number is being followed, either could work, but that is not explicitly stated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts