Jump to content

Rohaq

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    131

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Rohaq

  1. Rohaq
    How will this affect people who may have already installed the mod in its previous state? Does CKAN note that the metadata has changed, and the mod should be redownloaded and reinstalled?
  2. Rohaq
    Both of these pull from Spacedock, I'm guessing something might be up there?
  3. Rohaq
    The NetKAN file for this mod is configured to pull from Spacedock. No errors on testing the zip directly from there. Looks like it's already been reported in the CKAN thread, so I guess we'll have to wait.
  4. Rohaq
    @Icecovery Hmm, something's a bit odd getting this off CKAN: CKAN.InvalidModuleFileKraken: ComfortableLanding V1.6: C:\Users\<my username>\AppData\Local\Temp\tmp72B1.tmp has length 10959456, should be 10959281 at CKAN.NetModuleCache.Store(CkanModule module, String path, String description, Boolean move) at CKAN.NetAsyncModulesDownloader.ModuleDownloadsComplete(NetModuleCache cache, Uri[] urls, String[] filenames, Exception[] errors) I also noticed that the last commit on the git repo has the README.md updated, but no other files committed/updated?
  5. Rohaq
    Yeah, the .netkan file uses SpaceDock as a reference to pull this information down. It's possible it could be patched there, but the preference is generally to use references to a primary source that the author updates directly, to avoid them having to remember to manually update the netkan alongside it.
  6. Rohaq
    Ah nice, maybe I'll have a play with this; though I'd be a little pained to patch a stock part with additional attachment nodes; what happens if someone uses it, builds a craft attaching parts to the nodes, then removes the patch and loads their save?
  7. Rohaq
    So I was looking to fit a stacked Size 0 science part, and ended up needing to use an Size 1 cargo bay just to stack a single module nicely with the other Size 1 parts on my ship, wasting a ton of space in the cargo bay. What I thought would be interesting to see would be a cargo bay with Size 1 attachments either end for stacking, a "fat" centre to allow for space, and four stacked attachment points inside, allowing multiple Size 0 parts to be attached neatly in the final design. Here's a mockup using tweakscale to slightly increase the size of the cargo bay, using some procedural structural parts for smooth size changes, and a plate adapter for attachments. I'm pretty certain it's doable, but I'm no modeller/modder. Can anyone else weigh in? Or can possibly suggest an existing part mod that does something similar?
  8. Rohaq
    Gotcha, just checking it wasn't a known conflict
  9. Rohaq
    I do, is that likely to be the cause, or is it a prerequisite? I'll see if I can muster together some logs.
  10. Rohaq
    Two issues in 1.4.3.1: 1. Procedural Fairing upgrades show up in the part list, despite not being usable. 2. All but the smallest stock Airstream Protective Shell parts have disappeared, and resizing that one (via Tweakscale I assume) leads to the base becoming stupidly oversized. I'm guessing these two might be related? Maybe it's patching the wrong fairing part, hiding the Airstreams, rather than the procedural fairing upgrade parts?
  11. Rohaq
    First of all, I love Octosat, it makes for some beautiful satellites! I'm having an odd issue with the gargantuan dish though; when activated, the opening/closing animation just keeps repeating. It still seems to be working, at least. I've got a bunch of other mods installed, and I may be able to test this with them removed later, but was just interested to know if anyone had seen the same problem. Video:
  12. Rohaq
    Reported this in the Mk2Expansion thread, since they should probably fix their version numbering to avoid future headaches
  13. Rohaq
    Just a small thing; your version numbering is a bit off Version numbers aren't treated like floats; 2:1.8.1 shouldn't be a newer version than 2:1.8.02 to 2:1.8.06, since naturally sorting those minor versions results in ".06" being treated as the same as ".6", while ".1" isn't treated like ".10". If you meant to release this as ".10", it should have been "2:1.8.10" as the version string, so programs like CKAN can figure out the correct order of release. This also means you can use 3 digit minor version numbers, should you ever need to. It thankfully doesn't cause issues at the moment, since the Compatible KSP Version is different, but if you make a release across the same KSP versions in the future, it might cause issues with people installing older versions of the mod, and reporting already fixed problems in the thread
  14. Rohaq
    Just a minor niggle; your version numbering is a bit off. Version numbers between periods are considered numbers in their own right when it comes to software versioning; the entire version string isn't treated like a floating decimal number, for example: 0.5 is the latest version of your mod, but you've got an older versions of v0.14, 0.13, and 0.12 - Because 12, 13, and 14 are all higher than 5, they're considered "newer" versions by applications like CKAN. If these were versions 0.1.2, 0.1.3, and 0.1.4, it wouldn't be a problem, or alternatively if the latest version was 0.50, it would detected it as a newer version. As it is, this isn't the case
  15. Rohaq
    Dang, it could be Kopernicus, I've been disabling a bunch of other visual mods, including Scatterer, EVE, and associated packs for it, but I've only been seeing a few more FPS in performance. I'll keep an eye on Kopernicus' updates, and maybe see if there's some configuration changes I can make there.
  16. Rohaq
    I'm currently getting some crap performance in KSP, and I'm trying to track down the causes across my visual mods. Does anyone know what kind of impact on performance each option in the Scatterer config has?
  17. Rohaq
    Sorry, I only just got around to doing this https://github.com/KSP-RO/USSovietSolarPanelsPack/pull/1
  18. Rohaq
    I realise that this is the unmodded install forum, but are you certain you don't have any mods installed at all? I had the same issue when I had a mod that required Modular Flight Integrator, that I'd forgotten to install:
  19. Rohaq
    Very cool mod, thanks! Do you have any information of the .cfg file parameters? Most of them make sense, but I'm wondering specifically what "memoryGizmo" does
  20. Rohaq
    They've already "fixed" it in the latest release - They did it by disabling their solar panel implementation in 1.4.3, at least until they can figure out a proper fix for it.
  21. Rohaq
    https://github.com/KSP-CKAN/CKAN/commit/449711484d595d9c06d607b3437350dce3d22b0f Looking forward to this release, considering now MechJeb Dev and Scatterer are affected EDIT: Can I suggest the next release name of Goddard?
  22. Rohaq
    I'm guessing it has something to do with this? Though I'm not sure how this would be resolved, seeing as I don't have the DLC.
  23. Rohaq
    There's a good guide for doing this yourself: https://github.com/KSP-CKAN/CKAN/wiki/Adding-a-mod-to-the-CKAN Following that guide, adding your mod to Spacedock is probably the easiest method, since it can submit the mod to CKAN when you submit it - plus it has the bonus of your mod being updated on CKAN when you make changes to it via Spacedock. Plus it's a good platform for folks to find your mod who aren't using CKAN.
  24. Rohaq
    Or at least help me find the main contributor to it. Thanks! EDIT: It didn't completely solve it, but it definitely helped, thanks @Jimbodiah!
  25. Rohaq
    Doing this now, and good Christ this is going to take forever. Not helped by stuttering when I'm around my station - probably because of so many parts Also, as a bonus, apparently one of my docking ports is surface attached to a procedural tank, and since Konstruction ports need nodes to work, I'm a tad screwed there. At least it's not attached to anything though; I guess this is my docking port for the station now
×
×
  • Create New...