Jump to content

Alewx

Members
  • Posts

    1,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Alewx

  1. Wow, extreme seems not to fit for this beast. What is your nonwelded partcount?
  2. Careful, admins do not like it if the spoken language is not english in official english sub forums. But I find it cool to see that we have such a wide range in collaboration for mods.
  3. Well it is just a suggestion, and currently it is quite easy to make, without breaking any of the existing stuff, it just checks if there was no Generator attached if itself is already containing a reactor. More like an enhancement for future items and or welded parts. It is not that I wanted to reduce everything down to one single part. And you have the last word on it, but for me it was just something that was necessary at that moment with 8 antimatter reactors and 16 generators welded into one part.
  4. @Daishi Your textures are breathtaking, a retextureing of the stockparts from you, would knock out everyone. Where did you learn that or are you gifted with it?
  5. Sounds possible, but I would have to look at it, it was just something I noticed this weekend and had to do somthing:D The input would be like the fuel mode change of the reactors....... I will take a look.
  6. I have a question for the new docking procedures that are done with 5.0, the multiport docking. Did you guys develop some code that made it more reliable, or will it still be "bug-using", with the ports beeing just more accurat in the new parts?
  7. Flashing alarmlights sounds awesome , that would make IVA real fun.
  8. I really like the idea of having the parts with seperated functions, but that works for me only as long as the partcount is low enough. For me it is not just a case of function to have them in seperate parts but also asthetics, having one model for reactor and one for generator. Also I think reduction of such a thing would reduce interstellar in it's complexity.
  9. A Jet engine that is running out of air, would be my best guess as an example.
  10. Ok for All the Partwelding Fans out there (like me), I made a pull request for ingerated reactor-generator parts, that work on a single part, while still having all the tweaks and information of both modules. I hope someone finds this useul, otherwise it is just something for me.
  11. The Downloads are 2.3.3 and not 2.3.4, just wanted to mention that.
  12. Thanks, it is a company called GEMA. I just hate them, they lie so much and ignore other video portals completly.
  13. Arh right, sorry I forgot that in my morning sickness I have faith in you, you managed to get things to work that were more complicated, than combining these modules
  14. The video is not available, just me or in generell?
  15. So far It Looks nice, but might be a bit extreme in polycount even in a reduced shape. I think the leg sould be more like the ones from Asteroid Recylcling Technology But the idea of an animated landing leg that spreads the toes to increase contact surface with the planet is nice.
  16. Awesome, integrated into the partcatalog, that would restult in the ultimate sorting tool for the Editor
  17. Is Interstellar able to handle singlepart reactor-generator combinations? I have to reduce partcount and weld together as many parts as possible, and that included Reactor and Generator of the same size. I edited the modules in the part.cfg to have matching radius and correct values for usage and resource amounts, but as soon as I proceed to launch, I get the message that no reactor would be available.
  18. Great package, and I'm really getting used to the 5m parts, I just miss a 5m flat adapter, but awesome work. The sound is amazing.
  19. I heard the word Station Sounds intressting, I'm still not using them enough.
  20. What mods else do you use? Although I can not report any compatibility issues between IR and other mods myself.
  21. Damn you guys are too fast for me Yeah that is exactly what i was thinking of. That ring with the option scale and to add attachmentpoints like in procedural fairrings, and it is perfect. BTW are attachments points more rigid than surfaceattachments?
×
×
  • Create New...