klgraham1013

How about the creativity and sense of wonder the game can provide? - - - Updated - - - Absolutely this.

Why is this always the counter to clouds and such when it could obviously be a graphic option.

I agree about the vegetation, but having something amazing to look at on arival really increases the reward. Seeing a Jool rise on Laythe was amazing for me. The first time I saw a (modded) sandstorm on Duna. These sorts of visual enhancements can really add to the reward of traveling to distant planets.

I have faith that RoverDude will have resources done. That man is a modding beast.

Even on Earth you have to search for interesting land formations. I live in Iowa. It's a long way before there's anything interesting. Anyway, it's not the distance that's the problem, but the lack of anything at all. Eve and Laythe should be more interesting than they are. Duna should have more remnants of a past atmosphere. Instead we're left with "anomalies" that make no sense except for "lol, here's a monolith".

I agree with this. - - - Updated - - - No point in new planets when the current ones provide little but a surface to land on.

I wonder how long it's been since they determined the recommended spec. It may need a second look.

Really hope this gets picked up again.

Everyone knows clouds are a myth.

Can't quite hold on to ladder Colliding into launch pad at 70,000 meters Sabotaging decouplers Kappa

Just throw clouds in the graphics settings. - - - Updated - - - Love it.

I need this yesterday.

I could definitely see some contract shenanigans considering no one could have imagined the success KSP would have.

Even if they have set their own deadline and want to stick to it, is there really a reason they have to stick to 1.0?

Yet Maxmap contradicted this. I think I've got myself a new signature.

Amazing how a team so small can contradict each other on such an important detail.

So, let's take a look back. Here are some choice quotes from the Beta Than Ever: The Future of KSP blog entry. These are quotes I find interesting. Take from them what you will.

I understand and support this idea.

This sentiment has been repeated over and over, and is worth repeating, yet again, because of it's validity.

So docking ports would angle snap by default with no input from the user? I'm actually cool with that, too. Lining up specific space station parts can get tedious.

Is anyone besides Squad clamoring for KSP 1.0?

It's amazing how much better Kerbin looks with this one addition.

That would imply they're being forced into pushing forward to 1.0, instead of a decision based on the state of the game. Seeing as Squad says it's the latter, I would think they could very much change the fact that 1.0 is coming.

It's my first language and I completely agree.

Quoted for accuracy. I thought about praising Max for posting this on the official forums. Then, I realized this is the official forums where such behavior should be expected. At least it shows they listened to the criticism. I'll give them props for that.