Jump to content

RoverDude

Parts Hero
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,074

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RoverDude

  1. RoverDude
    1.8.x versions of all USI stuff as well as Firespitter are up.
  2. RoverDude
    FYI, 1.8.x compat versions are all up
  3. RoverDude
    v7.14 is up.
  4. RoverDude
    FYI I just finished updating Firespitter. Code is checked in but need to make the official release.
  5. RoverDude
    No point in switching given I maintain firespitter ;). But as noted before, I am halfway around the world.
  6. RoverDude
    Nothing works.
  7. RoverDude
    Will update once I am back in country in a week.
  8. RoverDude
    Good deal. FYI, I'll be out of country for the next week and a half with limited forum access
  9. RoverDude
    Supplies are more of a USILS concern vs MKS. For the rest, as long as you're ok running two resource chains, though it may get odd if a mod tries to patch for both. So mix at your own risk Tbh I think the effort of refueling makes short transport routes is self balancing, so I am ok with it. My opinion may change once I do some missions from Eve ;). In which case I agree with @DoktorKrogg's assessment and options.
  10. RoverDude
    *Looks at forum thread title....* *Looks at version file...* *Checks to see if 1.8 is out already....*
  11. RoverDude
    Those masses are probably absolutely correct for balance reasons There's actually a balance sheet that handles how much mass a part should have (along with mass reduction for MKs) based on functionality. So you do get some pretty hefty numbers, and that is completely by design.
  12. RoverDude
    Sorry trying to understand what it is you are asking to be improved?
  13. RoverDude
    There's an airlock included for this very reason
  14. RoverDude
    @Wyzard - You can get a lot of what you just asked for with antennas We decided to always have antennas behave as a buff vs a penalty. It should pop up as you prepare to transmit.
  15. RoverDude
    Asteroids work the same way as planetary resources, so you should be fine.
  16. RoverDude
    QoL was not the lever, interactivity was. Given that in stock, time is not a lever due to timewarp. In any case, this horse has been beaten to death. And rest assured, I will add no part that removes stock constraints. Feel free to Module Manage to your heart's content.
  17. RoverDude
    Encouraging interactivity =/= micromanagement. I respect that you disagree with how the stock system is balanced, but I have no interest in putting in a part that breaks stock balance.
  18. RoverDude
    You just answered your question
  19. RoverDude
    And that is exactly one of the balance levers. It's why they have a hold capacity in the first place.
  20. RoverDude
    It's also unbalancing. Saying this as the fellow who wrote the original MPL code for stock
  21. RoverDude
    Tbh not opposed at all to an mpl in the usual MKS formats, probably Duna and tundra 250
  22. RoverDude
    I am literally using the latest stand alone release in 1.7.3 and it is not breaking the game. More specificity please?
  23. RoverDude
    Whole idea is to give those interested a chance to kick the tires before release
  24. RoverDude
    That's for everything. I'd really need more context though. I.e. how many Kerbals? Pic of the craft in question, etc. It's super unusual for folks to run out of power with usils
  25. RoverDude
    Sounds like you need more batteries then.
×
×
  • Create New...