Tellion

The OX-STAT solar panels still seem to have a misaligned sun catcher, apart from that the recent additions look fantastic

Some custom planets I made the last two days to get some basic knowledge of Kopernicus. They are rather generic space engine clones and the forum is littered with those anyway, so they will not be released - the screenshots are the flattering ones too. Using EVE layers to fake a nice atmosphere from space and ground usually comes with some nasty side effects while transitioning between the two that I have not been able to get rid of. Scatterer will make this approach obsolete anyway... I just posted because I was delighted that this mod saved me doing all the math myself, and doing it over and over again everytime I wanted to create something similar

This mod is a real pleasure to work with, thank you very much

Not that I know of. OPM is using it too, nowadays.

No, it isn't. Kopernicus allows for manual patching of SOIs since a few versions, it is done by adding a sphereOfInfluence Parameter in the Properties node.

Using either the latest RF version on CKAN (10.4.9) with it's dependencies or the latest RF version from the OP in this thread, entering Eve's (and I think Duna's) atmosphere causes the following to be spammed in the debug log. Ambient density does not obey the gas law for vessel Mark1-2Pod (Untitled Space Craft) I did not notice any other issues tied to this, atmospheres were generally behaving fine and the issue does not occur on Kerbin. Tested on a clean install with only Hyperedit present apart from RF. KSP is 1.0.4, 64bit, the OS is Ubuntu. Player.log and Screenshot here.

Not sure if this has been brought up yet, but would you consider having CKAN create symlinks between the various download folders? It would save a lot of bandwidth and put an end to having to create/delete them manually every time an install is added or removed.

If you are interested going down the path of realistic ISRU, you might be interested in this project by regex. Apart from that, best of luck!

Has anyone else trouble with Tekto's atmosphere providing no drag when FAR is installed? Edit: Upon further inspection the issue seems to extend to all OPM planets with atmospheres.

Just something whacky I noticed while trying to understand Kopernicus - it is likely just this timewarp issue that occurs from time to time for no apparent reason, I did not even manage to reproduce it. I have seen something similar at least with OPM, so you are completely innocent

KillAshely, what are you using for generating your pressure curves? Anything informative you could point me to in that regard? Trying to grasp Kopernicus' Atmosphere section proves to be quite the daunting task ._.

Classic KSP

I was about to answer no, but I just took a quick look at EVE's textures and it seems that Astronomer used the same names for his (much larger) additions, so it might actually work out. In any case, those configs are not very special - if you notice clipping anywhere, editing layer height with the eve gui (alt + n) and copying the working values in the right .cfg under /BoulderCo will fix things in no time.

Not that I know of, but give it a try nonetheless. The visual packs usually work to a large degree without proper modifications. You can use the EVE gui (Alt/Rightshift +N) to adjust the height of cloud layers if you observe clipping anywhere.

What is the issue you hit?

EPL is the plugin those parts work with I reckon, so no, unless he would rewrite it the dependency will not get removed. As to the "heaviness", you can easily delete everything you do not want from EPL.

I miss the times in which my bugs were actually traceable to just one mod

I made this and it seems to be working fine, but it is very customized, meaning rescales are not uniform across all bodies. Smaller ones (Gilly, Bop, Hale, Ovok, Tal) kept their radius and only got orbits changed, Minmus, and if I remember correctly most of Urlum's moons are at 3.2x radius. I also made many changes to masses, trying to base the densities of many bodies on their rl counterparts. If you do not mind any of those changes, feel free to give it a try. This is great advice and everyone should employ this methodology to sorting out mod issues before ever bugging modders, but most of the times it is not quick to do, not at all

He might be talking about the planet, I believe. In any case, one can just google what the acronym stands for: Environmental visual enhancements.

I have kOS CPUs on all my unmanned probes but usually the game recieves an update before they arrive at places where signal delay becomes a real issue. Some day I will learn it though

Very, very interesting. Subscribed!

Are you sure about that? I have the impression that RCS was sometimes used for thrust by the flight computer as long as the main engine was deactivated. If I am not mistaken, that would make it possible to configure via RT. But in any case, Remote Tech alone has severe limitations, the primary example being landings. I would not want to attempt getting a probe to Tylo's surface with RT only, no matter the ullage issue. It is either Mechjeb, kOS or RT without signal delay for those situations.

I would add that RCS is not subject to ullage either - using it is nicer for your partcount than sticking 10+ sepatrons on your crafts.

Yes, it has. Read the last few pages for some more detailed info on it

Try playing around with the heating values in the part.cfg, check for missing values regarding heating by comparing to large stock engines, then tweak them to find a decent balance. Or try playing with the thermal section in the debug menu, that should lead to something workable as well. Those are some rather unelegant workarounds, but they should do the job temporarily.