Jump to content

theJesuit

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,203

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by theJesuit

  1. theJesuit
    Along the left with these should be a kerbalism tab. Can you screenshot the inside of your gamedata folder please? If you're unsure, send me a Dropbox link or similar of the screenshot of your gamedata folder.
  2. theJesuit
    Bring it up on the discord. The guys who coded it haven't been in in a while but that is a good place to ask. Peace.
  3. theJesuit
    Welcome to the Forums! Can you see a Kerbalism parts tab in the VAB? Peace.
  4. theJesuit
    I reckon you're good to go. Pressure is a standard set by the leakage of the ISS so that shouldn't be a problem. MTBF? That maybe in the settings. I think it was based on the mass of the part? Maybe heavy more likely to break? Check the kerbalism read the docs by the current devs. Peace.
  5. theJesuit
    @The-Doctor did you get this to work with ExtraPlanetary Launchpads recently? Peace.
  6. theJesuit
    Reduced LF to the ratios you've suggested.
  7. theJesuit
    Yup adding O is one of the first mods I did. That and adding O to the small fuselage. Peace.
  8. theJesuit
    You'll also need to adjust for humans if that is what you are going for. Multiply amounts per second by 4 in that case. Peace.
  9. theJesuit
    It depends. Does Kerbin's day and year length change? If not I wouldn't change a thing. A good shielded craft can easily do ten current kerbin years, along with all the amenities. So 'realistic' then. If the day length changes you'll need to adjust the default profile and the consumption rates as they are designed for a 6 hour day. Peace.
  10. theJesuit
    Also the unkerballed moniker isn't that catchy. Neither is my own usual fallback of "uncrewed before crewed.' How about 'probes before bros' or KAP 'Kerbals after probes'. POS 'Probe only start' UnCrewed Start UCS. Non-kerbal Probing. Advance Before Committing Crew. ABCC. I like this the best. If you aren't keen on it I may even work into Simplex. Peace.
  11. theJesuit
    Are you looking for more stockish or would something like Simplex Techtree with contract specific mods? I would be very open to some contracts being written to go with the tech tree or some suggestions to force flight before spaceflight (which appears to be what you are suggesting)? That's not my passion but happy to integrate someone elses work. Just a thought... I personally used to always collected science from the KSC biomes for several career playthoughs until I realised I was getting bored and discovered KEI. I mean personal tastes and all that. But I always thought that wheels are designed for off world stuff like low atmosphere stuff like the apollo moon buggy. Peace.
  12. theJesuit
    @taniwha i went for a more vanilla launch trial with fancy new EL launchpad2 no worries (except when I tried something with launch clamps . Perhaps then the issue is with Keridian Dynamics? Except that it would just that once when the build happened okay with the KD side launcher (as in the file) with a 6.3.3 build, save reload game with 6.3.2 and then finalise. Oh well, I'll keep fiddling. Also can you pleae let me know what the base Lance clamp things are in your video? Is that a KIS/KAS thing? Peace.
  13. theJesuit
    <learns how to make parts in blender> <creates obsidian knife> <installs KIS> <heads to the Mün with Jeb> <follows instructions> Nothing. Maybe my blender-fu is still lacking. I find people who use it are like wizards. Peace.
  14. theJesuit
    Thanks and thanks! You are very correct. What version are you using? This should have been moved to advanced Aerodynamics in 6.2.1.20181223. This version is also compatable with KSP 1.5.x as well. The engines were intially balanced due to ability rather than size. I guess the MH engine nerf might have changed this reasoning. I don't play with mod (including MH) engines so I probably didn't notice. I'll take a look but if you want to suggest where they would go that would be great. I'd like to keep ability intact though rather than size. It just so happened that the MH stuff fitted nicely elsewhere in that particular tier. Thanks for the feedback. Peace.
  15. theJesuit
    Hi Sauge, Are you running KSP 1.6? This is happening to me on 1.6. I'm not saying that to complain - I just realised the OP is still 1.5.1! But just wondering. Peace. EDIT, same thing happens 1.5.1. I'm trying a different version of EPL. EDIT2 - Yea, definitely a 6.3.3 issue @taniwha The same build works with 6.3.2, but freezes up and crashes ksp in 6.3.3. Did the resource thing you thought changed between 6.3.2? Also, what are the stands (launchclamps?) that are holding up the base in in your video above? EDIT3 - just ran again with my AngleCan mods (testing a Reources release) not included and it did it again on 6.3.2 (KSP 1.5.1). I'll keep testing a run a Issue on Github. Yes I first experienced this (admitidly haven't built anything in a very long time) when building with two resources, but this is a vanilla issue as well - Keridian Dynamics tank and side launch. It did work once, but not again. with 6.3.3. or 6.3.2. I've PMed you the code.
  16. theJesuit
    Do you github? Are you able to raise an issue/ bug please?
  17. theJesuit
    Totally unaware for me. Looks like i know what I'll be doing this evebing ti sort it out. Great find! Peace.
  18. theJesuit
    Trajectories or the latest versions of Kerbal Engineer Redux. Welcome to the Forums too! Peace.
  19. theJesuit
    I don't have the unofficial release and apart from the warning message it seems to work fine. Peace.
  20. theJesuit
    IVAs in SSPXr can be a drain on the resources for some computers (haven't tried in KSP 1.6 yet though). Regardless of stockalike, they do look great. Also, Nertia knew that and adjusted stock parts to suit! A stock rotating habitat (deployable of course) could be on similar lines to the porkjet one which is in the which is now in the Tokamak pack maintained by Linuxgurugamer. It only needs a rotating IVA. But IVA's i think are useless if they don't have external windows. So a rigid one (still deployable) with windows. The trick would be to NOT make it like movie ones, but hold six crew, enough for a full staffed landing crew with backup at another planet. Peace.
  21. theJesuit
    The other reason this would work well is that modders could could add modules to the ISRU. Say when ISRU is introduced you can only make LFO. The next tech level adds the ability to make indivual LF and O, the next tech level adds in Monoprop too. I'm thinking still aimed at modders, and not just these resources. This is just an example. Thanks! Peace.
  22. theJesuit
    @The-Doctor, documentation for you. (sorry for the ping N70) Also the active shield config for its shielding is found in Kerbalism/System/Radiation.cfg at the end of that file. Edit in your fav text editor to overpower it to your hearts content. Peace.
  23. theJesuit
    No, and I and i don't tend to get that far in saves to utilise them. That are modules to add to parts. You also need big numbers of resources. Also radiation is now cumulative. So for interstellar, deep freeze is still probably required as you don't want to keep habitats pressurised losing all that Nitrogen. But Deep Freeze doesn't reset kerbals stress and radiation either. Peace.
  24. theJesuit
    It works with CommNet. The big difference is that the connection always takes EC so that trains smiting doesn't require *more* EC. Ie in stock you take along enough battery to do your one off transmissons. In kerbalism now you have to generate enough to effectivly be always transmitting. If you don't, your connection is lost when EC is drained but then the batteries recharge, but then connection is made the batteries drain again. So take enough generation. Peace.
  25. theJesuit
    Humph. Changing the KerbalEVA so minpressure for safe remove being 0 doesn't allow for safe removal in the vacuum. But at 69,999m on kerbin it does. There goes my cfg manipulation. Any ideas anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...