Jump to content

theJesuit

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,203

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by theJesuit

  1. theJesuit
    Do you mean like a message to say which camera based on a tag of some description? Or a static tag/watermark? This would be a really useful addition I agree. A HUD message that pops upon switching camera views. Nothing if the tag field is left blank (default) or e.g.[user defined tag camera rear facing]. Peace.
  2. theJesuit
    @rspeed is the lv45 actually vectoring /gimballing? Or is it and it doesn't animate or am I just missing it? EDIT sorry I'm an idiot. Peace
  3. theJesuit
    LKO is up to 250km as defined by Science. HKO is up to geostationary?Cis-münar space beyond this?
  4. theJesuit
    My two cents and use the 1.4.2 features to group similiar models. B9 part switcher allows increase in mass, which stock switcher lacks but I do like the idea of maintaining onwards compatibility if B9 takes a long time to update in the future.
  5. theJesuit
    Yes and if you set up other profiles, alt 8 or 9 will switch between them I think. Obviously for mac and Linux users the alt is whatever the modifier key is. Glad to have helped. Peace.
  6. theJesuit
    Yup. Then run the game. Use alt 2 and alt 3 to start and stop the effect. Copy the config file and make a new profile (think kerbalism profiles) and play with the settings. The setup install instructions using Unity are for playing with config settings on the fly as it were. Peace.
  7. theJesuit
    Two posts above yours.
  8. theJesuit
    Potentially, bit unlikely with satellite contracts. More likely a stock variable regarding contracts. Kerbalism adds 'kerbal days in orbit' sort of thing. AFAIK. Peace.
  9. theJesuit
    The nitrogen issue you discuss is probably still there. One way to stop the tank spam would be to repurpose the largest monoprop tank and fill it with nitrogen. For storm shelters, @geb is right. It still works this way i believe. Turning off the habitat is the only way. I think ShotgunNinja couldn't work out a great way to force players to use a shelter - kerbalism treats kerbals as roaming free across a vessel like engineers manipulating ISRU rates in stock. In saying that, a storm shelter could perhaps be coded like the stock science lab. Only provides shelter when kerbals are living inside it? The weight of shielding would be applied when the module is 'setup' in kerbalism but would operate differently to stock shielding by only working when used by kerbals with penalties of suspending the rest of the vessel's volume counter for stress. Pinging @N70. Perhaps that coding model could be applied to a good, working recieved radiation health clinic or even a pyscho-analysis studio for reducing accumulated stress? Peace. EDIT I'm unsure as to the high warp stability these days.
  10. theJesuit
    It is SoonTM
  11. theJesuit
    Working for me?
  12. theJesuit
    Try heading to spacedock.info and locate it there. Peace.
  13. theJesuit
    Awesome! Looking forward to it. As a heads up I too have a new Profile to upload called Simplex. It will be a step up from classic to default with a slightly more stock-a-like feel with Air/BadAir and Consumables for Food/water. Radiation, stress pressure, leakage etc are all still in, but without all the different real world elements like H and N. I'm planning to post by the weekend. Question How does removing signal affect the slow transmission of science data- or is this more like stock now?
  14. theJesuit
    I personally don't play with kerbalism signal or science but have my own cfg to utilise the science value changes but without the slow drip feed back. I also don't understand why this is an issue for players who didn't like it and could simply switch it off. Has disabling it given a different result? Honest question here. Please don't bite.
  15. theJesuit
    If you are considering adding in further options to add to HUDs, I'd really like to have the resources available as a KER HUD, nothing fancy, perhaps total values only. Listing the resources in analways up in HUD with KER styling would be marvelous! Please consider this but if it is beyond the scope of KER say NAH and I'll happily move on. Peace.
  16. theJesuit
    Yea, sorry - I thought @navot was wondering about using the .cfg code that so far has only been found used in Squad's DLC parts, and was responding to that question. I think we are singing from the same sheet. Thanks for working with navot to keep this awesome mod relevant! Peace.
  17. theJesuit
    I would have thought it was fine if the code works without the dlc? Modders can use it in their own parts which would be downloadable with or without the dlc. You aren't necessarily distributing assets right? Add a line - 'designed to work with dlc but may work without.'
  18. theJesuit
    There is a fork update of KER that works. Perhaps try that rather than noting that old versions don't especially 1.2.2! But on a milder note... the issue of have the chips on is the reason I play 'partless'. I try very hard to keep the game as stock part stockalike as possible. One possibility is to remove everything from the mods except the part cfg mu and dds (png) files and the the game will run stock but keep the vessels in game. Peace.
  19. theJesuit
    Sounds like a massive project! Here is two percentage points of a single Funds. Change the standard docking port to the Clamp-O-Tron Jr Yea, I'm not a fan of the Clamp-O-Tron Jr being a crew passable docking port. It doesn't make much sense - the sizing might be right for a kerbal without helmet, but in the movie Apollo 13, there was quite a lot more room. Ith ink for consitancy though stick with the 1.25 model, but you could shrink the passable model within it slightly to allow for parachutes to be stacked. Also, I'm not sure how kerbals are supose to pass through the new SM-6A Service Module, with the docking clamp on top. I don't think Squad really though that through, but rather went with something that looked cool. Native Plugin for Inflatable Flotation Collar / Landing Airbag Does Comfortable Landing cover this already for you? Might save on work! Thanks for the hard work you do. Peace.
  20. theJesuit
    I think signalling has been disabled completely?
  21. theJesuit
    @N70 There have been many queries over the years as to how this issue that Nathangun resolved for m4ti140. I'm thinking two fold here. The first is that we could do with that kind of 'training' in the OP. The second is an option to have these turned off by default or have global config notification editing like for probes, relays, crewed vessels etc. In my own games I tend to spam satellite contracts around Kerbin, Mün and Minmus but I edit these at contract completion as a matter of course. I'd prefer to have them all off by default and switch them on manually for vessels I have along term care for: i.e. crewed vessels! Would this need an issue raised in the gitlab or such? Peace.
  22. theJesuit
    @NISSKEPCSIM, the Porkalike Gemini-style "Mk1-A" Command Pod. Is awesome! Thanks - looking forward to an IVA... do you have priority for your IVA release schedule? Or is it SometimeTM? Can I please make a request - would you do what you did for the MK1 Command Pod for the Mk1 LanderCan... perhaps using Ven's model. Having a two seater in that form would be great MacLuky created a three seater, but a MK-1 as a two seater with dual windows would be awesome - and an IVA as well Peace.
  23. theJesuit
    Awesomesauce. One assumes that in the new build (that is welded onto the building craft) it could include a new micro-pad and therfore build further extensions? That is all. Peace.
  24. theJesuit
    "Moar TrussesTM" for the win. Peace.
  25. theJesuit
    I liked this originally then realised that it must have been horrendously frustrating! Godspeed for your next adventure! Peace.
×
×
  • Create New...