Jump to content

theJesuit

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,198

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by theJesuit

  1. theJesuit
    The signalling has been removed or hard disabled. SIMPLEX is compatability with the current version 1.5.x? And probably the previous versions too. I'm not sure about the latest Jenkins builds as @N70 heads into 1.6.0 as the profile setup maybe a little different. But once released I'll ensure an updated ones through quickly. Peace.
  2. theJesuit
    I like it @MedwedianPresident. I'd keep it to in game logic as much as possible. Instead of an asteroid, why not a staging incident. With Jeb stuck with the lander as before. You could add a drop booster igniting flying around and coliding with the vessel. Peace.
  3. theJesuit
    This is a great idea! Thanks for providing it. Peace.
  4. theJesuit
    Welcome (partially) back! Peace.
  5. theJesuit
    Another update - I don't have much time to work on this, around twenty minutes a day currently. On the positive side of things i worked out my issue with the science box model. Basically I wasn't removing the old model or mesh or whatever. That's sorted and I standardised the size for it against the FL-T400. A nice aluminium style texture. Now that I've done this, I finish the part off an post the update today or tomorrow. Peace.
  6. theJesuit
    Or go through and painstakingly delete the parts models and textures you don't want... With a warning that this can lead to unintended consequences if you don't know which texture file relates to the part. Peace. Janitor's closet may help through as the post above mine. Peace.
  7. theJesuit
    Updated to 1.1 for the following mods kOS (adds kOS to everything with a command module (probes and pods)) https://spacedock.info/mod/60 FASA-RCS https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/172800-13-fasa-rcs-stock-like-mini-mod/ Tokamak https://spacedock.info/mod/1444 Research Bodies https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/139473-141-researchbodies-v197-17th-mar-2018/ EVA Fuel Transfer https://spacedock.info/mod/134 Kerbalism https://spacedock.info/mod/1774 HullCamVDS (not actually present but all parts are in a great location already! https://spacedock.info/mod/885
  8. theJesuit
    Hi everyone. An update is coming but I've hit a snag. I've created a new texture for the Simplex Ore tanks that is more in line with what I want and can implement it using an MM cfg texture changer. What's delaying me a ltitle was that I wanted to do the same for MetalPart and ModulePart containers but with a more rectangular shape using the scale and rescale options. I spent the weekend trying to do it with the ScienceBox model but could not get it to replace the texuture! Over the next few days I'll try with the ProbeCube model and see how far I get. At worst I'll utilise a part from another mod There will also be some code cleanup. So... Release 0.9 once containers are sorted with code cleanup and separating out. Also MetalOre will change to NaturalOre so that there isn't a conflict if someone has CRP installed. I also have agreement to add in KD furnaces. 0.10 with the Simple Construction mod files and Ground Construction mod files added. These mods won't be required for the Kerbalism profile, but if they are installed and not kerbalism then it will adjust them in the same way. .11 Keriden Dynamics mod profile Then a release? Peace.
  9. theJesuit
    Hi all. An update with some mod support will occur this evening. The engine reconfigure will be separated into a separated cfg so that it can be more easily removed if people want. Also, I've been wondering whether to implement some small twig branches which would be for part upgrades. These would cost a small amount of science but would add back some of the reconfigure amount, lessen dry mass of tanks, add functionality to probes etc. Solar cells, batteries. This wouldn't be implemented for a while though. And it would be a choice to either save your Science Points for the next tier or spend a little to make a certain tech a little better. The current logic to play through would not be altered. Let me know what you think! Also, I'm keen to know how people are finding the balance and which mods you want me to push support for. Peace.
  10. theJesuit
    I am working on it. As was the case with the HPTechTree, mods are unlikely to support it off the bat. Mods that use the stock tech tree will of course just add in on the node they are coded for, but I've made some logic assumptions, (such as size of tanks at different levels, a=so the balance may be a little off. A suggestion in teh past was to try and make it compatible with CTT, but my ownlogic assumptions didn't allow for it As major mods, currently I plan to add Near future, Keriden Dynamics; SSPX, Tokamak; KER kOS, and a number of small parts and enhancements such as Vens additional bits and pieces, KKPBS which I used to use a lot, but less so more recently Dock Rotate. Peace.
  11. theJesuit
    Awesome! Thank you!
  12. theJesuit
    I think self sufficient bases will be easier with Simplex... if only because you only need to worry about breakages and the buildup of radiation and stress amd mining only one resource. AFAIK the longest you can get with stress and radiation is around 21 years with max living space and max shielding? Also... I wonder if there is a way to implement a using of a resource to fix breakages. Ideas?
  13. theJesuit
    Thanks @Bonus Eventus Seems I'll have to do some playing with making my own textures. Peace.
  14. theJesuit
    Coding. That's just the way the balance was established. What do you see needs adjusting? Peace.
  15. theJesuit
    Hi all, I would like to add a stripe of colour to a stock part (an ore tank, the bracing around the middle chaned colour. And then distribute it as a mod. Firstly, if I copy and rename the stock.dds simply add the colour stripe using paint.net, then upload it as part of a mod for use in the Variant switcher, acknowledgement to Squad, is this legally allowed? Secondly, is it possible to just overlay the strip over the top using the Variant switcher and avoid the issue? Thanks for your help!
  16. theJesuit
    Could it be set up to track the same way that solar panels work using kopernicus to operate off their local star?
  17. theJesuit
    Great to know thanks! I'll look at again tonight and clean it up. I'll update both this separate tech tree and the Kerbalism profile. Peace.
  18. theJesuit
    The AngleCan QUARTIX TechTree 3.10 is now available. A TechTree designed for a limited number of mods! DOWNLOAD QUARTIX TechTree from SpaceDock Details and Mods support for QUARTIX The AngleCan TETRIX TechTree 2.26 is now available. Featuring support for, Near Future and Far Future mods, Restock, KSPIE, Kerbalism, and many many more! DOWNLOAD TETRIX TechTree from SpaceDock Details and Mods support for TETRIX The AngleCan SIMPLEX TechTree 1.36 is now available. Suitable for lightly modded saves. All nodes utilised with Kerbalism and ReStockPlus! DOWNLOAD SIMPLEX TechTree from SpaceDock Details and Mods support for SIMPLEX Requires Module Manager (not included). Licence is as for HPTech Tree = CC-BY-NC-SA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Known possible issues: Do not use with other TechTrees. CTT, ETT, HPTechTree, etc. It will cause all sorts of problems. Also, only have SIMPLEX OR TETRIX OR QUARTIX installed. Finally, the SIMPLEX or TETRIX or QUARTIX must be installed inside the AngleCanMods folder. Peace.
  19. theJesuit
    No worries, it had crossed my mind, it is just a matter of coming up with awesome and obvious names for the stuff. The only thing about the SSRSS was that I wanted a stock-alike feel, but was so used to how engines operated in vacuum in stock so I wanted to keep that. Eventually I'd like to add compatibility of the simplex resources to SSRSS, and hope that Galileo will continue his awesome work on it. Peace.
  20. theJesuit
    Thanks @Jimbodiah and I need to add a credit to you for the idea of limited propulsion from your SSRSS patch. Sorry it wasn't there in this release! I get the point about MetalOre - I'll do it differently. I might use HardOre or something and switch HydrateOre to SquishyOre or something so that there is little confusion. I guess I don't like having it all or nothing with or without CRP. I wanted an extension of stock but not too intense. Especially when adding mods that use part switching. So I've wanted a kind of a middle way. IFILS is great for showing what you have and how much but i like the idea of air scrubbing and atmosphere leakage. I want to different resources for different things too. That kind of simplistically but with a tweak for interestingness is where Im going with the EPL recipies as well. I may not use the Rocket Surgeon in the end. It over complicates things. Over night I've been thinking that I'll release the tech tree separately. The Kerbalism and EPL in the next release can both be there and not used if the mods aren't present but if some want just the tech tree it is less likely to need updating - unless adding mod support. Thanks again for the feedback! Peace.
  21. theJesuit
    Hi all! I've just released the third beta of my Simplex profile on Spacedock. Let me know what you think! https://spacedock.info/mod/1344 forum link https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/159470-wip-anglecan-simplex-08/ Peace.
  22. theJesuit
    Updated to the third Beta version 0.8. Peace.
  23. theJesuit
    RL issues - work and home maintenance sorry. Current hold up being some containers for MetalParts and ModuleParts. Happy with everything else, so this evening I'll upload the Kerbalism Profile and Tech Tree. Peace.
  24. theJesuit
    I too have a stupid question - an increasing number of the mods you maintain require Click through Blocker and Toolbar Controller - if Blizzy Toolbar is required to be installed, then some of the mods you maintain now require three others? Don't get me wrong, I'll install them as I really appreciate the work and skill you bring in, I just wondering about increasing diversification. Also, I tried Blizzy once (years ago) and didn't like it. I guess I'll be giving it a go again! Peace.
  25. theJesuit
    Has anyone attempted using the 1.4 stock art variant within a kerbalism setup configure - to change tanks colours etc if you are configuring to a new resource. If so... does it work?
×
×
  • Create New...