The AI-driven technological revolution makes human work excessive, eliminates the salaries, and puts everyone on basic income.
Postiundustrialistic Hill.
What a strange recipe.
A reverted "Admiral's Tea" ?
Navy can into Admiral's Tea.
***
https://www-doctorguber-ru.translate.goog/forum/forum4/topic59/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=nui
https://www-doctorguber-ru.translate.goog/book/samogonovarenie/tehnologiya-proizvodstva/article-blending/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=nui
https://alcofan-com.translate.goog/kak-razvesti-spirt-vodoj-v-domashnix-usloviyax.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=nui
It's docked and nailed.
***
So, if there is a dangerous side, permanently facing the incoming delta-Tselinides, isn't it wise to delivere a bullet-protective screen, to put the station in meteor shadow?
Yes, but does it keep its orientation along the orbit.
I.e. are there permanently "windward" and "downwind" sides, relative to the new LEO meteor stream (delta-Tselinides)?
https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/tselina-d.htm
So, are there modules more dangerous than others?
They are multicurvature spheres, while this table should be a monocurvature one.
Maybe, we could approximate this with a kind of parabola by casting the table top from liquid glass and rotating it while it's freezing.
Then using this as a casting form to cast the surface itself.
Just the rotation speed should be calculated.
If the sat was in a co-planar orbit, the relative speed would be lower than when its debris are on a cross-orbit.
Does the ISS keep some permanent orientation, or its rotation is chaotical?
But didn't we miss another significant factor?
We took as presumption that the table is flat.
But the Earth is not flat (citation needed). It's more or less spherical.
So, the table surface must be a segment of sphere, to match the Earth gravity field curvature.