Jump to content

Mad Rocket Scientist

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,920

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mad Rocket Scientist

  1. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Banned for having no signature.
  2. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Use launch clamps. Install Kerbal Engineer Redux, and make sure your rocket's thrust to weight ratio (TWR) is between 1.3 and 1.7. When you want to land somewhere, check the wiki for if it has an atmosphere or not, so you know what methods to use to land there. Heatshields have more ablator than is necessary for a LKO reentry. Kerbin atmo ends at 70,000m, make sure your periapsis is above that. Have fun!
  3. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Amazing! I don't think I'm going to try it, since even looking at these pictures makes my computer tremble.
  4. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Looks nice! However, it probably doesn't need four landing gears in the back. Nice video, too.
  5. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Do what a kerbal would do, and replace it with a staple!
  6. Mad Rocket Scientist
    -3 [-]
  7. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Is this all a set up for a terrible rocketdyne pun? Have a replike.
  8. Mad Rocket Scientist
    I think you just post on this thread, and then ZooNamedGames will contact you.
  9. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Mediafire links were recently removed, see this post for details: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/130041-mediafire-links-removed/
  10. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Does that work? It does! That's great, thanks!
  11. Mad Rocket Scientist
    I'm not official in terms of role management, but from what I understand, we need anyone who can help! Here's a list I compiled, it shouldn't be too out of date:
  12. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Okay, so have you seen this video, by @Cupcake...? That mothership at the very start uses a Mk3 engine adapter, a bit like yours! Have you considered adding a Mk1 crew module like in the video here? It looks great, though!
  13. Mad Rocket Scientist
    I'm planning on only putting one kerbal in each of those two-pod pods, would that be a problem?
  14. Mad Rocket Scientist
    The Tylo lander is done!
  15. Mad Rocket Scientist
    At least they didn't get the Earth-observation (Climate change) satellite budget cut, like NASA.
  16. Mad Rocket Scientist
    -2 [-]
  17. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Okay, I'm going to replace the Mk1 tanks with Mk3 tanks. This thing's useful, although I've forgotten how to use it since the last time I used it: https://alexmoon.github.io/ksp/
  18. Mad Rocket Scientist
    Ah, thanks!
  19. Mad Rocket Scientist
    I was thinking of releasing it after I've built the whole series from 40t-100t.
  20. Mad Rocket Scientist
    B-pod, eh? Well, you could always remove those cargo bays and use Mk3 crew modules inline. Other wise, 3x symmetry on mk2 crew modules makes an approximately 2.5m form-factor 12 kerbal pod.
  21. Mad Rocket Scientist
    That's a clever alternate way of making a linked image, I'll add that. As RIC pointed out, that doesn't remove the grey lines.
  22. Mad Rocket Scientist
    What devnote was that from? I must have missed it.
  23. Mad Rocket Scientist
    I think I might give this a try, since I just got my RO/RSS 100 ton to LEO lifter out the door. Here's my tentative design for a mothership: To be called "What instructions?" The landers will dock below the science lab. Will 4296m/s delta-v without landers do it?
  24. Mad Rocket Scientist
    It looks to me like they're both; that is, an RW clipped into a battery.
  25. Mad Rocket Scientist
    100 tons to LEO, right here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pr6AYHH33FG0kHEa34BNi56hii6CVd4bTTYyNMLwkXU/edit?usp=sharing
×
×
  • Create New...