Jump to content

drhay53

Members
  • Posts

    444
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by drhay53

  1. There must be something weird in my admin building then, or a mod is removing strategies. I used Career Manager to upgrade all buildings, and in previous saves I always used strategia, but I was going for a different setup this time. Will have to look into it.
  2. I checked before I posted and all I saw was that you can sell rep for funds. I didn’t see anything to exchange science for rep.
  3. Is there a mod that allows you to convert science to reputation at the click of a button (not play your way, where you get rep for every point of science collected)? I surprisingly can't seem to find one, and I've never had a career setup where I wanted to do it before.
  4. Some days I truly thank god that I am not a mod author. This week is one of those days.
  5. I watched Scott Manley's video about the DLC (haven't started playing 1.4 yet myself, so some of these changes I could already see), and I have to say: 1) The new parts really look very nice. It is definitely good to have a lot of the new parts and functionality available without mods. 2) The new particle effects look really spectacular, as do the new aero effects 3) While I have literally zero interest in creating missions, and I wish there was a way for missions to be linked to a career, I can appreciate that creative players will be able to do some really awesome things there. I'm a little concerned that the long-term viability of the primary feature of the DLC is heavily dependent on the community adopting the feature and using it to create new content.... but, I think it will work out just fine, at least at first. I hope future updates don't break any missions though, as one day the community will of course slow down, and at that point, I hope all of the great mission content remains viable.
  6. If you're mad about people who have volunteered literally thousands of hours of their free time, without compensation, not updating things fast enough (or at all, even) then quite frankly you need to rethink your attitude about life.
  7. Just want to say that for me, KSP is mods. Without mods, I would not have bought the game or be playing it still today. It took me a very long time to try SSTU, because I was worried that it wasn't complete enough or that it would change too rapidly for me. Now I don't think I can play without it either. With KSP I feel like I'm always waiting for a few more things to come together before the game is truly "stable" for me. Every save I run into something that turns me off; the first time I learned how bad framerates can get, for instance, or game-breaking bugs in mods with authors who have taken a break or who are otherwise unwilling to hunt down specific bugs. I'm always waiting for KSP to be "exactly what I want it to be". I won't hold it against anyone if they get burnt out on modding; it's such a thankless job. It's so much work that takes away from gaming time, family time, relaxation time, etc. I've donated more money to mod authors than I've spent on KSP. Anyway all this rambling is just me saying thank you to all mod authors who've given me literally thousands of hours of time-wasting, work-avoiding, sleep-reducing fun. If you decide to leave, I'll just say thank you for all you've sacrificed for my fun, and I will never hold it against you.
  8. review bombing is stupid
  9. On one hand, I get why people are upset, but on the other hand, I wonder if people realize how many of these "contracts" they've explicitly or implicitly "signed", and what of their rights these "contracts" have explicitly said they've waived.
  10. Just a note, you also have to upgrade mission control to level 2 to unlock maneuver node creation
  11. As others have said, it's best to just have SAS off entirely. On fuel transfer, you're redistributing the mass, so it's really kind of the same as docking in some sense. These are all symptoms of the same problem, which is that the attitude control systems are causing wobbling (my guess is that it's likely because it takes some time for the torque to actually transfer through the craft). When you're about to dock, you want to have all sources of potential attitude control off as well.
  12. I guess I have two thoughta really. 1) the mod kerbal joint reinforcement should help with the wobbly death spiral 2) likewise, minimize the use of reaction wheels on the station. In my experience attitude stabilization is a common source of the wobbly death spiral kraken.
  13. I didn't have Chatterer installed, so that's probably not it (and it would be weird if that were it), but there's a decent chance I had AVP and scatterer installed, via CKAN.
  14. My vote on the tanks is for #2), but I do like that the MUS come as #1), because it's nice to have a small amount of monoprop in there for time where I'm forgetful
  15. One note, it does make a difference in a different way, in the sense that if you launch prograde (with the direction of the planet's rotation), it requires less delta-v to get to orbit, since you gain the benefit of the velocity at the surface of the rotating planet. Because with ascent guidance, you could launch retrograde (absolute value of inclination greater than 90).
  16. I have a couple of mods that add ISRU equivalent parts, but I think they use stock ISRU modules. So I guess I need something that finds everything with the stock ISRU module on it, clones the LFO converter and changes it to Hydrolox, and clones the MonoProp converter and changes to Hypergolic.
  17. I have a theory about this which is that your CSM is orbiting the moon retrograde. If, in map view, you zoom out such that Kerbin is behind the moon, you want your insertion into Munar SOI to come from the left. This will make sure your orbit is rotating in the same direction as Mun's rotation, because that's the direction that Mechjeb will launch with ascent guidance. I have recently used ascent guidance from the Mun and Minmus for a landing in every individual biome, with a launch to rendezvous, so that's over 20 launches, and Mechjeb never launched retrograde. My guess is that your CSM is orbiting in the wrong direction.
  18. Does anyone have a custom MM patch that adds Hydrolox and Hypergolic to ISRU converters? I can manage to modify individual parts, I'm sure, but I'm not quite good enough to just modify every converter. I don't really care about balance, I just want to be able to do it; usually I just copy electric charge and resource rates for LFO -> Hydrolox, and MonoProp -> Hypergolic.
  19. I've never used these, can someone explain why I would want them? (Other than that the models look awesome)
  20. I've played around with the 2 major base-building mods that add significant gameplay elements, i.e. MKS and Pathfinder, but in the end, I think KPBS with TAC-LS and EL is really going to be the right level of complexity for me to actually play a career save to my designated "end." On that note I'm going to start a career save with KPBS and FUR for the first time, despite having admired them for a long time but always felt like I "needed" to have a Pathfinder or MKS style mod. Having actually installed them for the first time, I just wanted to commend you on the really nice and clean parts and textures, excellent part descriptions, and the relative simplicity of the parts catalog. You've covered pretty much everything that I'll need without too much parts bloat, which I greatly appreciate. Looking forward to this save a lot.
  21. Would help with the website if I could, but I'm a python programmer and a scientist, which is to say, I'm self taught and don't write very professional code Had no idea SpaceDock was run by such a small crew. Will donate when I can get to the website again.
  22. I never found a solution and eventually started a new save with a totally different set of mods.
  23. @Angel-125 I have encountered a couple of issues which have previously been reported, and I will try to describe them here. The first issue was reported about a year ago and I don't see that there was any resolution. I have a Casa inflatable that was originally configured as a Pigpen, which was reconfigured to a Geology Lab. It's "Manage Operations" button does not work; it causes a new "Start Converter" button (currently I think it has 10 from me playing around) to appear in the right click menu, and throws an NRE. Here is the NRE that I believe is thrown, as well as a link to an output_log: There is also a lot of spam at the end of the log for this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5d624j2gk6h0tx9/output_log (3).txt?dl=0 For this issue, I cannot track down the full set of steps to reproduce what happened. When tested with my clean install shown below, the Casa is behaving normally, but perhaps the NRE will give you the answer. The second issue was reported in January and is that there is no deflate button on any of the inflatable modules. I set up a clean install with only Buffalo, Pathfinder, and the associated requirements. Here are screenshots of the install, the right click menus, and a link to an output_log from that game. https://imgur.com/a/9Mu3q The MLM holds equipment. https://www.dropbox.com/s/kxlqmaq2mylwvt3/output_log (4).txt?dl=0
  24. Ok, I found a bug in your Orion patch for SSTU. In lines 268 and 271, you have a comma where you should have a period for a decimal place. Fixing that fixes the exploding bottom fairing.
  25. @Jimbodiah originally posted over in the SSTU thread: Ran into a strange issue with an exploding part tonight. The SC-C-SM-250 blows up on me when the bottom fairing is toggled on. It blows up as soon as it loads to the launchpad. Here's an imgur album: https://imgur.com/a/Dq1pp Here's the craft file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3anp9h6lh1qb1fg/MunBaseCrew3.craft?dl=0 and an output_log: https://www.dropbox.com/s/j6ubxyrmcb2ubgh/output_log (2).txt?dl=0
×
×
  • Create New...