Jump to content

Galileo

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,298

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Galileo

  1. Galileo
    The settings I use for scatterer are exactly as I they come with SVE. I don't see a huge difference between 256 and 128. So I just use 128 for performance sake. I have a GTX 980 oc, i5 4690k 4GHz, 32 gb ram and a few TB of SSD's. I see a constant 60 fps in atmo and vacuum. It might dip into mid 50's every now and then. And I run roughly 90 mods when I play. When I run just SVE and SVT I get about 85- 90 fps pretty constant. It only drops down to 60 when I add the 4-5 large part mods that I use. All on 1080p res. Do you you use a lot of part mods? I whittle mine down to only the things I want. For example, I use procedural parts, so I delete all other fuel tanks and I get rid of little things like ladders, except the ones I like or find useful.
  2. Galileo
    Also, try installing the mod manually not through CKAN
  3. Galileo
    Or you can download the mod, Mechjeb and Engineer for all. Just need the latest module manager http://kerbal.curseforge.com/ksp-mods/221500-mechjeb-and-engineer-for-all
  4. Galileo
    How and where did you install it?
  5. Galileo
    Well ksprc is a tricky install along side SVE. It's possible though. I made SVT to work with SVE to alleviate headaches for people that had trouble with ksprc and sve. But yeah 64k should be fine with SVE.
  6. Galileo
    What OS are you on?
  7. Galileo
    Yeah for sure don't run through steam :=
  8. Galileo
    Ok, how are you installing it? Did you install both files? Any CPU configs AND AnyCPU EVE?
  9. Galileo
    Probably. I'd say for sure before Christmas 2019. Until then, use it because it works perfectly. There's an old saying. If it ain't broke don't fix it. There has been no reason for an update.
  10. Galileo
    sooooo..... at the main menu....... toggle ocean shaders off then restart your game. I'm a coding genius and this proves it
  11. Galileo
    If you could accomplish that, you would be my hero
  12. Galileo
    It should be separate. I didn't put it on ckan and I don't use it so I don't know what the set up is on ckan exactly. Afaik it's separate
  13. Galileo
    Thanks!
  14. Galileo
    You can use it. Won't hurt anything Yep just delete it
  15. Galileo
    I just reread your comment and there were some big changes this update. Only Minmus Bop and Gilly had height maps before. In this update I included new normal maps and height maps for almost every celestial body. Most were pretty exaggerated to give the surface a really dynamic, rough feel to it
  16. Galileo
  17. Galileo
    And it's the best visual enhancement mod out there tooting my own horn a little
  18. Galileo
    Ok good to know I'll probably re-release this sans heightmap then
  19. Galileo
    Yeah I would Uninstall it and make sure I can load saves without it first then try reinstalling it
  20. Galileo
    Have you tried reinstalling?
  21. Galileo
    I'm almost 100% sure it's not this mod causing it. Check to see that you have saves in the save directory. Not in game but in the actual folder
  22. Galileo
    If you can create a flat, rectangle texture map, then use the 3d plugin to view it on a sphere, and it looks good, you can always open your history window in PS and just delete the state that says "New Shape from Layer" and it will revert back to a flat, rectangle. Then you can make edits and repeat if you need to. That's how I do it. If you need more help just pm Now that I have finished updating my mods for a while, I have some free time, so any help you need let me know
  23. Galileo
    That is caused by the shadows the clouds cast in E.V.E. The only way to get rid of that is to turn shadows off in the E.V.E. GUI by setting _shadowfactor = 0 The only other way to fix that is to remove or remodel the light texture on that tower thing and I don't know how to do that. The same effect happens with landing gear. I don't find it a big deal. I spend most of my time in space anyway.
  24. Galileo
    LOWER RESOLUTION AVAILBLE NOW I don't know how the performance is as I run 60fps+ with the higher res so I'll need feedback. If it's not any better, then I apologize.
  25. Galileo
    So I work fast and have already converted all textures to 512x512. I did a little testing and it doesn't look half bad. I'm not too sure about the performance as I have a really good rig and have never seen anything south of 60fps, soooooo ill leave that to be determined by those who try it out. The only thing I changed was the ground textures resolutions. The scaled space planet textures are still 4k because at 2k they look worse than stock. I'm about to upload to spacedock so stand by for a link. Hopefully the performance is better for those who need it.
×
×
  • Create New...