-
Posts
7,298 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by Galileo
-
JNSQ v0.8.5 Gallery Check it out
-
1.8 Terrain. How do I get it?
Galileo replied to The Dressian Exploder's topic in KSP1 Gameplay Questions and Tutorials
Scale your UI back up to 100% to fix the altimeter. This has become a very well known bug and is all over the forums. Squad is aware and it will be fixed. As for the terrain, you have to select the settings in the graphic tab on the main menu to turn them on. They are not on by default. -
[KSP 1.6.1] Stock Visual Enhancements [v1.4.1] [20 March 2019]
Galileo replied to Galileo's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
This mod works as long as Environmental Visual Enhancements is updated, which it is, so yes this will work in 1.8. I cannot recall if I removed the version file, but in the case that I did not, ignore the version warnings and load the game as normal. -
[1.7.3] G'ths Visuals for General Gameplay - JNSQ and Stock
Galileo replied to G'th's topic in KSP Fan Works
Thanks for the hard work! I am going to open a channel in the Discord for you if you are interested. -
1.8 no altitude reading
Galileo replied to AJJB's topic in KSP1 Technical Support (PC, unmodded installs)
Change your UI back to 100% scale. -
Can we make real space shuttles with Moar Boosters?
Galileo replied to TheJoolian's topic in KSP1 Discussion
why not duplicate the part with MM and rename it so it doesn't conflict with your other replicas? -
You have version 18.0? Is it everything we imagined it would become back in 2011? Are landing gear finally fixed? What year is it wherever you are? Are people on Mars yet?
-
[1.8.1] Kerbal Konstructs - 1.8.1.15 - 15.Dec.2019
Galileo replied to Ger_space's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
One page back. -
While the scatterer dev isn't always on the forums, he is quite often in a few modders discords. He is around. Real life sometimes takes up mod time. He has not dropped support and would be the first to let anyone know if he did (obviously). He has an irregular update schedule, but always comes through. Saying he is probably gone for good is just wishful thinking on your end, I suppose. One does not have to be on the forums every day, week, or month to be considered active. While everyone wants scatterer to be updated, we have patiently waited for updates in the past and we will continue to this time around as well. He has been working on that mod in his free time since 2014-2015. So let's say about 5 years. He hasn't visited the forums in 3 weeks and that means he is just gone now? C'mon.
-
[1.8.1-1] [PLEASE FORK ME] Kopernicus & KittopiaTech
Galileo replied to Thomas P.'s topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Every time some one asks, it gets pushed back a week. -
Some people just want to feel like an important figure in the community and will just look at what they technically can and can't do, decency be damned. Opportunists, at least until it becomes overwhelming with bug reports and issues, then they disappear. At least, that's what I've seen over the years. And I'm not saying they aren't always with ill intent. Most really do want to help and that's respectable.
-
What it sounds like you are suggesting is that users are entitled to immediate updates to mods that are given for free by people that do this in their free time. And if they take longer than a few days to update, someone should pick it up and run with it? Is that right? I agree, abandoned mods should be continued and thank goodness for @linuxgurugamer for not allowing that to happen, but if what I assume you are suggesting is correct, that's a bit ridiculous.
-
I was talking in regards to Kopernicus
-
Don't worry about donating. I dont know why I even have donation links up. I do this for fun not money. Donations don't motivate me but the thought is appreciated! So thanks!
-
Oh sorry I meant to quote lisias!!
-
I think you are arguing something very different than the issue at hand. And I agree with you. Yes, please learn from others work. I am not saying that you can't do that. And in the case that a mod becomes inactive for a very long time, then there will be an opportunity to continue it. But this is not what the issue at hand is.
-
Every mod here is in active development. If your read that and think a threat, that's way out of context... That's easy to do with text. Our minds expect a certain type of response, and yours expected a hostile response. So that's how you read it. That's great, but what does that mean to you? Does it entitle people to the fastest updates, regardless of the source? That's what I think when I read that.
-
A released update is not the same as in development.
-
He changed nothing! It was a recompile! That could break things for users. Careers people may have had for months. And before you go on about making backups, understand that not everyone thinks ahead like that.
-
Not everyone thinks like you and would instead go "crying" for help from the original dev, possibly resulting in the dev taking his ball and going home, forever. Sound good? It has happened before and will happen again. Mark my words.
-
Every single mod that was "updated" by RBT was in active development over the last 30 days. Impatience at its finest. Create a pull request and move on and be patient. If you update it for yourself, so be it. Releasing it to everyone, historically on these forums, has not been good for the end user, and especially not good to the original devs.