Jump to content

XOC2008

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    693

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by XOC2008

  1. XOC2008
    Need that Wasp and Kuznetsov... but Kerbinside is looking so much nicer.
  2. XOC2008
    Since no one addressed this, I will. There are no VLS tubes in BDAc so mentioning that in this thread doesn't help you. I will however say that I am 99% certain this is a result of using missiles with a small offboresight number. Under 135/150 degrees offboresight will result in the AI ignoring the target despite having a radar lock because the MISSILE won't have a lock till the plane is nearly overhead, and by then it will be moving too fast to get a lock and fire. Find a missile with a larger offboresight number and test.
  3. XOC2008
    Yes.
  4. XOC2008
    Pretty simple really. Flood the ballast till the deck is below the surface, engage the engine and dive.
  5. XOC2008
    Your max off-boresight on an aim-120 is 50. Which is why I said the off boresight number could be an issue. If the missile you are using has a number below 90 degrees for offboresight it's probably not going to be used effectively, if at all, by the AI because it's limited to a small cone. Change the number to 135 or 150 and retry. (Adding to that, make sure you delete partdatabase.cfg, the MM cache files, and remove/replace the missiles on your craft before testing.)
  6. XOC2008
    You'd be surprised how easy solutions are often missed. And I've been a tester for BDAc for a while. I just cannot replicate this issue. All my missiles meant for VLS function fire from VLS under AI control.
  7. XOC2008
    I'm sure the boresight range is probably the key here. The AA11b in SM Missiles and Launchers has a max off boresight of 150 and will launch from VLS at aircraft using AI, without any issue at all. You could probably increae the off boresight value to 180, but 135-150 should offer a good cone of defense around a ship. If the off-boresight is that high and the AI isn't utilizing it, check your settings for the missile itself. If it's not set to air/missile targets, that could also be the problem.
  8. XOC2008
    SM Marine has submarine parts. Not WWII era, but submarine parts nonetheless.
  9. XOC2008
    You may be using an older version. In which case, go to the patches and find the terminal guidance mm patch. Delete it. This should fix the problem.
  10. XOC2008
    SPANNER. And that would be SM Marine, not SM Armory. Neither of which are BDAc.
  11. XOC2008
    If you're talking about the SLBM launcher, that's really meant for the large ballistic missiles and I'm sure with smaller missiles it sets off the collision check. There are no dedicated VLS launchers in SM Armory however that I am aware of.
  12. XOC2008
    I'm talking ABOUT ship vs air where VLS works fine.
  13. XOC2008
    Much like any possible bug, more information is needed. Perhaps video or screenshots, and a copy of the KSP.log for those that know how to translate them. I can tell you for a fact that I can fire missiles from VLS tubes just fine using guard mode.
  14. XOC2008
    But you can already specify competition distance.
  15. XOC2008
    I have no intention of installing FAR, so hopefully someone can solve this issue. As for the offset, basically yes. I’d like to have less square-tipped control surfaces.
  16. XOC2008
    I'd like to request a tip-offset added to the all moving control surface. BTW does this fix the mirroring issue on the regular control surfaces preventing their use as flaps?
  17. XOC2008
    Ah yes. Anti-Mater.. the evil version of Mater from Cars. It all makes sense.
  18. XOC2008
    That reminds me I need to rebuild my Bronco.
  19. XOC2008
    Messed up? I guarantee it's because you did not install the localization.
  20. XOC2008
    Versus has a BDAc dependency if you want to use the AI parts and the built in gun in the Eagle: @TheKurgan @SpannerMonkey(smce)
  21. XOC2008
    Regarding scale: Most of the SM hulls and turrets are at or are near scale, so you could base a fair amount of your scaling off of those.
  22. XOC2008
    Updated mod to 1.4.x compatibility and a minor update to the droptank cfgs.
  23. XOC2008
    We had some discussion about this today. It's not really PRE that does it. It's KSP/Unity and the loading order of objects. PRE only exacerbates the issue by increasing the loaded vessel distance. I have the glitchy flashing with and without PRE so it really makes no difference. It'll be fixed when KSP is fixed, instead of getting the bandaids thrown on as temporary solutions.
  24. XOC2008
    https://github.com/SpannerMonkey/SMI_MissilesLaunchers/releases/tag/v0.1.1.0-beta
  25. XOC2008
    To add to what Doc is saying, I think you should work slowly. Refine the ships one at a time rather than just dropping a bunch all at once.
×
×
  • Create New...