Jump to content

Jognt

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,076

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Jognt

  1. Jognt
    Just now I realized I commented about problems I encountered but did not come back to properly thank you for fixes @Gotmachine So thank you. Edit: Sadly I cannot help or say anything regarding problems encountered by others here as I haven’t played since 1.7.
  2. Jognt
    There's a lot of ways to get stuff done so my main question would be "What are you trying to achieve when you say you wish to 'disable' them?" (literally no thrusters? thrusters that are toggled off by default? Just the effects but no thrust?) With regards to :HAS[@MODULE[ModuleCommand],@MODULE[ModuleRCSFX]] -> the comma means AND. A pipe means OR. Note that OR does not work within a HAS statement.
  3. Jognt
    Not sure if I’m glad to know I’m not the only one! But yeah, accurate.
  4. Jognt
    Uhm. Check your ModuleManager.configcache file. Do a search for the experiments in question and check the xmit value. It should be 1 when using the applicable mod. If it’s not, then your player.log and/or ModuleManager log (if it’s still a thing in the logs folder) can tell you what specific CFG applied the change to the specific part. (They’re all listed like “applying patch XYZ to part.cfg”-ish)
  5. Jognt
    Apology for the reference but it’s not meant to be funny. I actually turn some of them off because they really sound like a Hitler speech..
  6. Jognt
    Literally every body is reimagined, atmosphere heights were tweaked, lots more. I’d lean towards calling JNSQ a total overhaul instead of just a rescale.
  7. Jognt
    Use CKAN to manage your mod install. Either that or tell us what actually happens/goes wrong.
  8. Jognt
    Don’t worry. Nobody is attacking you or your exquisite mod.
  9. Jognt
    In world filled with Kerbals that believe MinMus tastes like pistachio I wouldn’t stray too far into the ‘real life’ angle. Duplicating reality is a great way to make stuff no fun to do.
  10. Jognt
    Just to check: You have completed a SCANsat Biome scan of the body in question?
  11. Jognt
    yes, it does.
  12. Jognt
    Honestly? I can't remember the exact details, but back when Breaking Ground was released I must have added it for a reason! Past-me probably found that the Breaking Ground surface feature experiments (which this applies to) have a usecase where modifying them is undesirable. Note that you may as well just grab the Full Reward and/or Full Transmit mods as those do exactly this and will be updated along the way. Edit: I take that back. The ROC experiments that I just checked already have basevalue == sciencecap. So there shouldn't be scary stuff (or even changes at all) by ex or including them. I must have excluded them on a "Don't tweak what I don't yet fully understand" basis or to keep unneeded modifications to a minimum. My apologies.
  13. Jognt
    Works fine here with these two patches: // Set the amount of science you get for an experiment to its max value. Now you don't have to perform the same experiment in the same situation several times to get that last bit of science. @EXPERIMENT_DEFINITION:HAS[~id[deployed*],~id[ROC*]]:FOR[MyStuff] { @baseValue = #$scienceCap$ } // Small config to set the xmitDataScalar value for numerical science @PART[*]:HAS[@MODULE:HAS[~experimentID[ROC*],~experimentID[surfaceSample],#rerunnable[?rue],#xmitDataScalar[<1]]]:FOR[MyStuff] { @MODULE:HAS[~experimentID[ROC*],~experimentID[surfaceSample],#rerunnable[True],#xmitDataScalar[<1]] { @xmitDataScalar = 1 } } Not to mention that x Science only activates experiments, as far as I know it does not interfere with the amount gathered and/or sent. Ps. you will have other issues down the line if you don't add ROC experiments to your exclusion, just saying. Also working fine here KSP 1.9.1 + x Science 5.26
  14. Jognt
    Should be fixed in the next update: Im guessing the comments about it being normal behavior are referring to the fact that everyone experiences it at the moment.
  15. Jognt
    Good to know, thanks. I don’t see X Science adding compatibility for anything any time soon though. Considering the fact that DM’s Generic module works but his non-generic does not and that it has repeatedly been stated that compatibility Isn’t planned. It may be possible to slot in DM’s generic module into US2 experiments clientside similar to my DMOS patch. Once I have the time to play or tinker, I’ll have a look.
  16. Jognt
    Fair enough. It’s no more than a personal suspicion after all *activates anti-derail-system* Let’s get back to the topic at hand shall we?
  17. Jognt
    Nah. Just my suspicion with the rate of updates and the (what feels like) reduced changes per .x update. Felt to me like increasing the version number was more important than the patch itself. Otherwise 1.9 could’ve just been another 1.8.x patch.
  18. Jognt
    On the plus side, I’m guessing the KSP1 team wants to release ksp1 2.0 at the same time as Ksp2, so with that being delayed I’d guess we’ll be on 1.9 for a while
  19. Jognt
    Stay safe! And thank you
  20. Jognt
    Xmit impacts how much of the gathered science you can transmit. It doesn’t change the max amount of Science you can gather per go. Are you sure you’re not confusing xmitdatascalar and science value?
  21. Jognt
    @PART:HAS[@MODULE[DMModuleScienceAnimate]]:FOR[PersonalStuff]:NEEDS[DMModuleScienceAnimateGeneric] { @MODULE[DMModuleScienceAnimate] { @name = DMModuleScienceAnimateGeneric } } I haven't played since 1.7.1 so your mileage may vary in terms of functionality, but I have no reason to believe it should no longer work. Note that this won't help US2 at the moment since it doesn't use DMagic's DMModuleScienceAnimate. (But creative minds might be able to make it work with USScienceExperiment?)
  22. Jognt
    Might be an idea to switch to DMagic's DMModuleScienceAnimateGeneric? Personally I'm using a CFG that replaces DMModuleScienceAnimate in Orbital Science parts with the Generic variant since the generic variant works with X Science whereas the non-generic does not. Of course I have no idea on whether or not DMagic's module has the required functionality to slot into US2 parts, but that guy is a wizard, so maybe?
  23. Jognt
    I think the visual plume and the actual thrust/heat effect are separate (game mechanics-wise) Some more info About when you’re seeing this problem would probably be useful.
  24. Jognt
    Just to elaborate on MM syntax: “@spreadAngle” will alter it if it is present in the CFG. If not present, it does nothing. “spreadAngle” will blindly add it to the bottom of the part or module in question, even if it was already there. “%spreadAngle” will alter it if present, and add it if it is not. Happy tweaking!
  25. Jognt
    Assuming ‘description’ is a key with a string value in it I highly doubt MM is going to find any keys or MODULES in there. I’d stick with the split patch thing unless there’s a specific reason you’re trying to merge them?
×
×
  • Create New...