-
Posts
690 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by RaiderMan
-
[1.8.x - 1.12.x] US Probes Pack - Old and New - 8-26-21
RaiderMan replied to raidernick's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
will this pack be updated for 1.3.1? -
..this is what we call an 'oops' moment.
-
cause why the hell not? XD
-
..this is going to be so much fun to play with.
-
where are the thruster ports located? do the thrusters have full reactive capability, eg roll, pitch, yaw, translation control, thrust/reverse?
-
integrated rcs, probe core and battery, I take it that means she's got monoprop for that rcs?
-
any plans on updating for ksp 1.3.1?
-
[Old Thread] KRE - Kerbal Reusability Expansion
RaiderMan replied to EmbersArc's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
fair warning, even with identical sets of mods, not everyone's experience is the same, so, while kerbal+modset alpha(example only) might work for one person, it may not work for another. -
[1.12.x] Near Future Technologies (September 6)
RaiderMan replied to Nertea's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
will this release be compatible with 1.3.0 for those of us waiting on other mods to get their 1.3.1 compatible updates? -
[1.12.x] Near Future Technologies (September 6)
RaiderMan replied to Nertea's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
doesnt seem like everyone's experiences are identical, then again, no two kerbal installations are alike, even with identical mod sets installed and all.. -
[1.12.x] Near Future Technologies (September 6)
RaiderMan replied to Nertea's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
1.3.1 crashes with ANY mods installed, its equal opportunity crash city. -
[1.3+] Stockalike Station Parts Expansion [retired]
RaiderMan replied to Nertea's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
and ksp just updated, and with that, pretty much every NFT mod is flagging an 'unsupported version, please use ksp 1.3.0' -
[1.3+] Stockalike Station Parts Expansion [retired]
RaiderMan replied to Nertea's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
nicely done good sir. -
S-IVC tank ended up being enough for a higher than expected orbit, thank you overpowered sarnus-he2j-550-s engines...went with a twin mount care of the s-ivc mounting plate, that and the twin mount looked cooler and gave me that roll control the two rocket scientists above me were going on about the stock s-j2 was underpowered on the twin mount, so it became a case of overpowered or underpowered. I took the former option. I omitted the LAS as thats weight I didnt deem worth while in bringing up.
-
I went with the S-IVC tank on the second stage as I want a little more fuel, I dont have to use it all and have installed the remote so I can deorbit the second stage safely on its own. edit: figured out why she wanted to nose over towards inland..I only had one communications dish on the mol in the lem bay. you'd be surprised at what can throw off a launch stack's weight balance..