Jump to content

Bej Kerman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,002

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Bej Kerman

  1. Bej Kerman
    There's a big difference between HAVING ANY and having THE BEST. You're arguing with your straw man. It's not a straw man. If anything, Master39's sarcastic suggestion makes more sense than "KSP 2 will not be complete without fluff like snow and rain effects" because farming would constitute as actual gameplay. It would sill detract from the core pillars of KSP 2, but at least there would be added gameplay as opposed to just fluff.
  2. Bej Kerman
    Are you going to create that mod? There's no point in asking these kinds of questions up to a year before release.
  3. Bej Kerman
    Made up problems. The devs have promised a very ambitious project and hype can easily become unhealthy. Besides, the consensus is that random fluff like grass blowing with the wind and rain on windows is all surface-level junk that does not contribute to the game in any meaningful way.
  4. Bej Kerman
    That doesn't explain why you're trying to raise KSP 2's expectations to comical levels. KSP 2 will not look like MFS2020, but that does not mean it should be written off as a bad game.
  5. Bej Kerman
    No, just no. It should be clear now KSP 2 isn't going to have intricate weather graphics and MMO elements - building expectations for this is, again, setting yourself up (and anyone taking these posts too seriously) for disappointment, and bound to lead to people getting angry to the devs over things they aren't making KSP 2 for. That would be unfair. You aren't free to expect anything because that is bound to make people treat the devs unfairly.
  6. Bej Kerman
    The comparison is silly. There are no planets with atmosphere without weather. It's simple, it's not "toxic". For me not having weather is like not having a day/night cycle. I think the general message being conveyed is quite clear. The game you are wanting is not what KSP 2 is trying to be, and making constant comparisons to other games that have more time to focus on the things you have spent your time on the forums wishing for is gonna lead to disappointment. If you want my advice, you should just stop lamenting about what KSP 2 will not have and start talking about what KSP 2 already has. No more "KSP 2 needs weather because other games with much bigger teams have it", no more "How does Starfield compare?", try instead saying "The new parts for KSP 2 have been modelled very well and I look forward to using them myself", or maybe asking "What will the colony parts be used for and how does the player interact with them?". Just anything that actually focuses on what KSP 2 can have or will have, instead of setting yourself up to create backlash when KSP 2 doesn't launch with such luxuries as weather, intricate vessel interior exploration and power washing suits.
  7. Bej Kerman
    That is just outright false.
  8. Bej Kerman
    One of the reasons I like that KSP 2 is trying to "slay the Kraken", as opposed to being passive about it. Seeing other people summon the Kraken is fun... until it happens to you while you're actually trying to play the game properly.
  9. Bej Kerman
    Games like Elite Dangerous, No Man's Sky, etc. already fill this role.
  10. Bej Kerman
    Maybe I should rephrase my point - posts that serve only to raise unrealistic expectations for KSP 2 can be harmful, and they do not add much to the discussion. If you want to discuss about how amazing MFS2020's graphics and sound design is, then the best place for that is the Microsoft Flight Simulator forums. Same for other games with little bearing on what KSP 2 focuses on: simulation of rockets and how interplanetary colonies interact.
  11. Bej Kerman
    If you don't consider the game as a whole when making those comparisons you only end up setting yourself up for disappointment. No matter how good of a game it will be, the flight model in Starfield won't be as good as any of the simulators or other piloting dedicated games out there, and there's no problem with that. When you pick up FS2020, a game that used its entire budget on making the planet and atmosphere look as realistic as possible (a budget backed by one of the biggest tech companies, Microsoft), and set that as what you expect or want from KSP2 you're setting yourself up for disappointment. [snip] these kinds of posts [snip] It's like rallying people to raise their expectations for KSP 2 to unrealistic levels. Even if that's not the intent, it's still the result of making all these pointless comparisons. If people could actually talk about KSP 2 instead of anything but KSP 2, that would be nice.
  12. Bej Kerman
    A KSP 2 wiki exists on Fandom, but it is barebones (and probably crawling with misinformation and outdated info).
  13. Bej Kerman
    No-one will come up with a better analogy than this, even if the human race outlives the Sun.
  14. Bej Kerman
    It should say a lot that SpaceEngine team, developing a program now capable of visualizing the Kerr-Newman metric, considers the volumetric rendering systems needed to create proper gas giants a whole other beast. Weather visuals as elaborate as OP is wanting might as well be just as out of reach as CFD weather simulations. They are setting themselves up for disappointment.
  15. Bej Kerman
    The people who don't shouldn't be too affected by new aerodynamic models, then.
  16. Bej Kerman
    Remember, this is the very start of the game. Kerbin having any tilt and Mun having any inclination would just hinder any new players trying to wrap their head around Hohmann transfers.
  17. Bej Kerman
    Extra emphasis on this. If you're disappointed that KSP 2 isn't looking to have weather, then KSP probably isn't the game for you nor is it the game you want - you should be looking at games like No Man's Sky and Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 (or Microsoft Flight Simulator X if your system can't handle the former). Those games have weather, vegetation, etc. Stuff that KSP 2 isn't looking to have, because it doesn't need them.
  18. Bej Kerman
    It's just tilt, a planet flipped 90 degrees would only waste a few hundred meters a second on a ship trying to enter a coplanar orbit, at most. There's almost no added challenge compared to the stock system. If you can go beyond Minmus, you will definitely be able to handle a few degrees of tilt.
  19. Bej Kerman
    Even though this is a line of features completely irrelevant to what KSP 2 is really about?
  20. Bej Kerman
    Intellicom was not talking about atmospheres Intellicom was talking about planets that heat your ship just by being there. You need an atmosphere for that.
  21. Bej Kerman
    What I meant is that due to the speed of sound you would hear the explosion a couple seconds after it actually happened. I wasn't arguing with that, just making the point that it's weird that very loud noises in KSP 1 fade very quickly over distances they should definitely be heard from.
  22. Bej Kerman
    Explosions shouldn't become almost silent a kilometer out.
  23. Bej Kerman
    Idk if this is true, but maybe the pod represents ksp2 Maybe the pod's (already short) dwindling supply of fuel represents the decaying attention spans of KSP 2's fans.
  24. Bej Kerman
    It's a space game and the ideal space game will have put more effort into effects pertaining to space than weather.
  25. Bej Kerman
    Just be patient and it'll come quicker.
×
×
  • Create New...