Jump to content

x170doom

Members
  • Posts

    97
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

26 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. that could work, I believe the benjee 10 pins are handled by b9ps, however they are fixed on the model, so it may be possible to use the info in the part cfg, as for the port that matches, is that the latches themselves or the floating node that's on your model, since I think I might be able to brute force a matching node with node helper
  2. @Rudolf MeierI'm currently working on some new patches for habtech2 and payloadretention systems (as well as some of your other mods) and could do with your insight, namely is it possible to have payload retention systems work without the model for the trunion pins on the station modules, the reason I ask is because the current dev build of habtech 2 has trunion pins as toggleables on the station modules, thanks in advance!
  3. sort of had a similar issue, only it does partially work for me, just errors out on IVAS with MAS. on your install try switching between the standard IVA, DE iva without mas and DE+MAS and see what happens
  4. is there any hope for support for blackrack's Deffered mod? unfortunately neptune camera seems to be the only mod listed as flat incompatible atm,
  5. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xTPRbgVAtjzcbwgaVa6XmM_JcYXTuQxP/view?usp=sharing log here, had a quick scan through, no warnings or errors related to the engine though
  6. so interesting detail found while testing, the issue seems to be with how the switch for the 8089c is implemented, as when placing the engine there is visible Z fighting on all configs, plus you can see that the 8089c is allways present over the other modules, additionaly the C model doesn't appear in the b9ps menu. will be posting logfile soon (just closing ksp now)
  7. caught a minor snag on current dev branch, just want to see if anyone else has it or if it's a possible conflict. for some reason the agena 8081 engine has the SOT bell present in every config, seems like its model stays present at all times and other configs have the correct model loaded in underneath it. anyone else seen this?
  8. @AlphaMensae not sure if you are aware of this ( ik you are active in bdb's forum occasionally but I don't think this has been brought up there) but the atlas launch stand doesn't line up correctly with the atlas revamp that they currently have on the dev branch. can we assume that there is going to be an update to the atlas stand so that the pipes and such line up after the revamp?
  9. @EStreetRockets the latest changes on the GitHub master seem to cause a B9PS uncaught exception if FAR isn't installed, here's the error from the log (would include screenshot from error in loading screen, but pressing anything other than "quit" soft locks my PC) Relevant part of KSP.log:
  10. question: how do you avoid the arm uncontrollably shaking + how do you make sure the parts you deliver line up correctly (I tried doing this myself and ended up with a rather... wonky station)
  11. @AlphaMensae I just noticed the remnant core option seems to be missing from the hammerhead crane. was this intentional? 'cause it was a cool feature
  12. got these changes made, starting ksp now, will post if it fixes the issue edit: all seems to be working now. IVAs are switching correctly
  13. heres the log file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1n0jmIxQhWN4K408_5c-zyw4LKejWy5hn/view?usp=sharing I can't seem to find the modulemanager.configcache file. only a .physics and .techtree file
×
×
  • Create New...