Krzeszny

I wanted to mention that ST15 sounds like a famous Kazi, but I couldn't decide between Kadolf Kerrman and Kitler Kerrman.

Is anyone else annoyed by that particular recording from chatter>russian>capsule>ST15_02.ogg ? It's so distinctive and hence repetitive that I had to delete it. In fact, I'm starting to be annoyed by most ST15 recordings.

Update2: still causing a crash. They're the pressurized tanks in the shape of mystery goo containers. As soon as you click one, the game freezes and crashes shortly.

Can CKAN check whether the DLC is installed?

There could be a soundless version or just a config for those who like stock sounds.

The mod is cool but the description doesn't mention the sound changes and not everyone wants sound changes bundled with a particle effect mod.

The OP version or the experimental version? EDIT: CKAN version works fine in 1.9

I keep misreading it as Smart Pants

Were you able to fix the issue or did you uninstall the mod? Is it bugged?

@Nertea what do you mean by saying in the OP that CKAN is not supported? Is this information outdated? Mark IV is available in CKAN.

Hello there. I tried using this mod but all it did was change the symmetry button icons. The symmetry modes were the same as stock, and the mod's settings weren't doing anything. The hotkeys weren't working either. I had the mod and its dependencies installed through CKAN. By the way, the OP is out-of-date - it says in bold that the mod will only work with 1.4.1, unless Second BTW, I hope you're aware of the fact that CKAN shows most of your 1.9.x-compatible mods as 1.8, likely because of old metadata. Should I report those mods to CKAN, or something?

Alright, I agree with the rest of what you said, however, the mod hasn't been updated for a year and the author hasn't been online for over a month. The information that it "works with KSP 1.7.2 and later" is out of date.

I see thanking in advance as an equivalent to demanding or pressuring (just like 2.2), or in other words, taking away your right to say no. If you google "thanks in advance", it's a common topic on the internet that it's considered rude by some, which is why many websites list alternatives. You're not so much appreciating any answers, but expecting, and thus requesting those answers. You're right, I didn't mean to pressure you or even request an update in this case. If I did, I'm sorry. I know I might have requested updates in other topics... In this case, my unspoken question about 1.9.1 was "is it compatible with 1.9.1". CKAN shows it's 1.8.1-compatible. I did see 1.9.x in the title, but I'm using CKAN. I've found multiple mods that were made for 1.8, even 1.8.9 but are broken in 1.9. So, do you have an idea why CKAN marks it as 1.8.1?

This mod https://github.com/meirumeiru/InfernalRobotics/releases hasn't been updated for close to a year. According to multiple users, it doesn't work anymore in 1.9 but according to one user, it worked in 1.8.x - see the latest posts. Seems like it's compatible with "1.4.0 and up"... to 1.8. Perhaps even 1.8.9, but evidence suggests it doesn't support 1.9. I meant these contract packs: Kerbal Acadamy, Tourism Plus, Field Research. But the evidence that they're broken is not enough, so they all need further testing. Furthermore, this mod is not version-specific, so you can change it to "any".

TBH, I don't understand what exactly should be reported to Kopernicus authors (yes, that means you can do it). But if changing the (famous) line 285 fixes this mod, a patch would be enough. But then there's still the bug juvilado reported.

Thanking in advance isn't polite. I might do it but I started playing KSP last week so I'm not very experienced.

@linuxgurugamer Do you know about the bugs mentioned above, including the missing "KopernicusSolarPanels"? I don't mean to pressure you.

Speaking of maintenance... you already know the question. 1.9.1?

Is this 1.9.1-compatible? The Cryo Tanks mod needs it.

-

@HebaruSan Speaking of compatibility, I've found more wrong metadata. The mod Infernal Robotics Next is marked as "any" but the author says it was last compiled for 1.7 and is said to work with 1.8.x but not 1.9.1 according to 2 users. Also, nightingale's contract packs have issues in latest KSP even though they're marked as "any", and nightingale is inactive so it can't be changed by them.

Nevermind

No, RoverDude says it's compatible only with 1.8 and that CKAN is right about that. "1st" last post says it's incompatible with 1.9. Anyway, all we can do now is wait for CKAN's author to update LET's data... or to explain why that dependency shows up.

CKAN lists Firespitter Core as a dependency for Lithobrake Exploration Technologies, while it's not a dependency - it couldn't be found in the configs and there is no information about the dependency in LET's thread. Also, the mod Fuel Tanks Plus is marked as 1.9.1 compatible in CKAN but it's not. Many users complain about its radial tanks causing major problems and the mod is officially marked as 1.4.1-compatible, not 1.9.1. I wanted to report metadata problems on GitHub by clicking on "report an issue with mod metadata" but the link leads to the same page as CKAN-related bug reports and there's nowhere I can report metadata problems there.

In this case, who should I contact to remove that dependency in CKAN? The Firespitter Plugin isn't even compatible with latest KSP, so I can't install this mod.